Pamphlet for a New Energy Policy


 

5) The paradigm of the relative ether

   We can call the current, prevailing paradigm the paradigm of relativism, which is based on Einstein’s early statements when he declared the assumption of the existence of the ether to be “unnecessary.” The relativity of morality and matter is not wrong in itself - on the contrary , but the “-ism” of it is wrong if we use it to claim that nothing absolute exists anymore. That was never Einstein’s intention, and he was also annoyed by this interpretation. Of course, just as you in religion have the Holy Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit as a  given absolute, one also has  time, space, and matter as an absolute triad, without which one cannot live or reason, not even in heaven. The fact that time must be viewed as relative, i.e., must be considered relative to a frame of reference - such as the position relative to a center of gravity -, does not alter this in any way. Time remains, unchanged, the absolute principle of life in the created universe.

   The relative and the absolute form a fundamental duality that cannot simply be split in two by declaring one half to be non-existent. Relativism is therefore wrong, and absolutism is just as much so. Einstein himself preferred to speak of a theory of invariants; as for him, it was about the absoluteness of the speed of light. To him, it meant a mathematical exercise; the axiom of a constant speed of light constitutes the basis of his calculations. The question, regarding the inevitable duality of relative versus absolute truths, is rather: 'How do we escape the onesidedness that seeks to strangle fundamental dualities?' Denying the old ether as an absolute entity in favor of a relative, modern ether in the form of the fourth dimension of spacetime relative to the three known dimensions, is a mistake.

   The relativity of the ether in the manifested world (curved spacetime) does not preclude the absolute reality of the primordial state that underlies that relativity. The absolute nature of the ether existed before it broke its symmetry and led to manifestation. It is still measurable as the cosmic background radiation present in the resulting universe as an expression of an eternal, spacetime expansion that transcends everything else. In other words, the absolute always exists alongside the relative. In religious terms: God exists alongside that which He brought forth, for parts always belong to a whole. All that exists is part of its Great Collection. Alongside the relative nature of creation, there is also the absolute of what is physically called the singularity, from which everything originated and to which everything returns. You cannot simply cancel one out against the other. If we want to move forward with our fourth-generation free energy technology, we must address the ignorance surrounding the dualities concerning the concept of energy. So first and foremost, the question is: what exactly is energy?


5.1 The Definition of Energy

    If we don’t know what energy is based on the equations E=mv² (Leibniz) or E=mc² (Einstein), then we have a crisis, just as you have an identity crisis if you don’t know what your identity is, or an economic crisis if you no longer know what money actually is (namely, a dependent variable that we manipulate; it is a means and not an end). As is known in physics, energy can be recognized in the capacity for work, which can be expressed as the velocity of mass (in the sense of its angular momentum) up to the one of the speed of light. But does that description actually define what energy is? If the queen is described as a lady with a crown in a golden carriage, is that the definition of a queen? We know that in the 20th century Mrs. van Buren, Beatrix of Orange, was the queen of The Netherlands  even when she was not sitting in her golden carriage or wore a crown. Linguistically, this boils down to the question: what is the difference between a definition and a description? Does physics consciously distinguish between a definition of something and a description of something? If not, is that lack of distinction then perhaps the reason we have an energy crisis,  the crisis which, as for this, prompted us to write this piece on the energy issue and the order of time? The dictionary states:

Definition: "A concise description of the characteristics of a concept, so that it cannot be confused with another."

Specification: "Further description or explanation."

Description: "A complete list of the details and characteristics of something or someone."

A description may be complete, but it may not be exclusive, as a definition requires. For example, a description of what energy is can be confused with a description of what a force is. After all, force is only energy when you apply that force. If physics doesn’t take this distinction too strictly, Einstein tells us with his formula: the force of light consists of the fact that  its particle, the photon, travels at the speed of light while it (in itself constituting a wave) moving up and down (or else transversely moving around) travels at that the speed of light (and thus constitutes the square of C). That does sound understandable, and it’s interesting too, isn’t it? We have now given Einstein’s description the character of an explanation by assuming that energy and force are concepts that are easily confused. The dictionary again:

Energy in relation to people: the force with which one does something or strives for something.

Electrical energy: work performed by an electrical energy source; the power of electricity.

Kinetic energy: energy associated with the motion of an object.

Potential energy: energy possessed by an object as a result of its position (e.g., gravitational energy), shape (e.g., a stretched spring), or state (e.g., a battery containing electrical energy).

These definitions show us that when energy is confused with the force used to perform an action, it refers to the person. In other contexts, the term energy refers to the work performed with it or it refers to itself. Definitions that refer to themselves do not make things much clearer. From this perspective, what, for example, is the energy of light? Is that energy electrical, kinetic, or potential? Can we deduce that it is kinetic from the speed of a photon in a vacuum, based on the fact that removing air leaves no medium that can still offer resistance? Is such an assumption even true, given that we know about so-called gravitational lenses that photons behave differently in gravitational fields? The vacuum is supposedly nothing, but it does affect light. In fact, we this way don’t really know what the energy of light is. We work with assumptions based on descriptions and constants that, together with corresponding theories, must then prove that they reasonably cover, measure, or predict reality.

   A description, however, may lack the explanatory power that a definition requires. We may know the energy - mathematically, physically, etc. - but understanding what we’re talking about isn’t necessarily a given. From a linguistic perspective, as we saw above, a description does not necessarily constitute an explanation; a definition, however, must do so if we truly wish to describe what we see in an exclusive and explanatory manner. Explanations exist to help us understand things; descriptions do not. In other words Einstein, who was not an analytical philosopher but rather an experimental thinker, does not simply provide an explanation of what energy is with his description E=mc², but merely describes one of the possible natural relationships associated with the concept of energy, based on the unimpeded maximum speed - a constant speed - of light in space.

   So what is actually needed -  if we want to understand what we are talking about - is a fundamental, comprehensive description that can serve as an explanation, i.e. an explanation that leads to the understanding that puts an end to the energy crisis that is based on this ignorance about what energy is. You cannot properly control what you do not fully understand. After all, knowledge is power. What you know well and can control, cannot, therefore, lead to a crisis. In a crisis, you lose control: it is the control that turned out to be illusory! At the beginning of the 21st century, there is a battle raging over energy resources and the price of energy, which practically means e.g. that we were no longer allowed to watch, for example, the better plasma screens - as the Dutch government announced in mid-March 2009 - because they consume more energy than LED screens. We struggle with an energy crisis. So... With such crisis measures in place, shouldn’t we take this opportunity to investigate what the best explanatory and operational definition of the concept of energy is? An explanation, in other words, we can work with, put into practice, and that makes it clear that our struggle over resources, scarcity, and price was based on ignorance. If we set Einstein aside for a moment, could energy, for example, perhaps exist independently of mass and express itself in something other than the speed of measurable particles such as photons? Could it perhaps be the vibration of an unmanifested form of matter, or something proto-material - a form or source of energy that not yet being material exists prior to it, merely being virtual or potential? Linguistically, that is certainly permissible. The dictionary:

Virtual: existing as a possibility or potential, capable of becoming a reality or taking effect.

Take, for example, the proposition: a magnetic field structures the energy of the space that serves as the medium for magnetism. This is a proposition that inventors often invoke when developing their attempts at vacuum energy conversion. That field is not visibly material, but it is dependent on the matter, the force, and the quality of the magnet. A magnetic field is therefore secondary or subtle matter - tangible, but not visible. The energy of space itself, however, need not be subject to that dependence. According to the proposition, the magnet does not produce the energy; it merely structures that energy. Without the magnet, that energy is unstructured, i.e., it cannot exist in a materially related form as a chaotically moving graviton particle or as a separate, independent vibrating string, as quantum mechanics and string theory, respectively, propose.

  In this context, one also speaks not only of vacuum energy, as we saw in Chapter Two, but also of dark energy, zero-point energy, or the decoupling of the determinability of a particle’s momentum and position (Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle). In modern theoretical physics, space can be viewed as a separate, independent, massless form of energy. But Vedic literature, for example, stated as early as thousands of years before Christ: the ether, just like the soul, does not mix with anything (B.G. 13.33). So, really nothing new under the sun these ideas are not.

5.2 Forces of Nature 

  A static, conservative force such as magnetism or gravity cannot, in and of itself, perform work or supply energy. But logically speaking, can the combination of two such conservative forces also be conservative? The difference between these two fundamental forces of nature can be expressed in terms of time, because all differences we know can be described as differences in time. A difference between two forces, conservative or not, then implies - when related to matter - kinetic energy, or a measurable time difference. The sages (Heraclitus, Plato, and Aristotle) already said: everything moves, pantha rhei, nothing ever is, everything becomes, and nothing is permanent - in other words, the universe lives and moves.

   That is the absolute nature of time: there is always movement, an interplay of forces, a time difference when there is distance, a difference with matter that we call space. Viewed in this way, space is pure time-energy, the result of an interplay of the various forces of time - that is, the fundamental forces of nature, which, when considered in isolation, are conservative. And we must accept this understanding of the space-matter-time trinity as a correct definition of the entirety of the physical object of study, for this is how we perceive it. The magnetic Earth rotates and produces flashes of lightning in conjunction with its gravitational force. Viewed in this way, space is then pure time-energy, the result of an interplay of the various forces of time, i.e., the fundamental forces of nature that are conservative in themselves. And we must accept this understanding of the space-matter-time trinity as a correct definition of the entirety of the physical object of study because this is how we perceive it: the magnetic Earth rotates and produces lightning flashes in conjunction with its gravitational force. That is what we see: electrical energy from rotating magnetism; the Earth is a dynamo driven by time, and our minds move in accordance with the agreed-upon definitions. This is how Faraday arrived at his experimental findings, and today we have electric motors based on rotating magnets.

   And now we also know what energy is: a time difference formed by matter in the form of space. Space as time-energy is the result of the interaction between the different forms of time: expansion or forward time, contraction or backward time, and rotation. It is a balance of expansion and contraction, of the centrifugal and centripetal forces of the matter in moving planets and stars, which together we call the universe. The term free energy therefore refers, from a physical standpoint, to unbound energy - the energy of space, the energy of the so-called vacuum, or simply space-energy - an energy that, in principle and logically speaking, can be converted into kinetic, usable energy by playing off against one another the fundamental forces of nature and the various forms of time-energy associated with them. That is why this discourse is titled “The Energy Question and the Order of Time.”

5.3 The Physics of Confusion  

    Physics is neither philosophy nor linguistics, and that is why physicists, whose reasoning is often incomprehensible to the common man, not only easily confuse what is a description with what constitutes a definition, but they also confuse what is a principle with a law, and what is a constant with what is absolute. In the special theory of relativity, which emerged around 1900 from the inability to demonstrate the existence of the ether, Einstein establishes the maximum speed of light in the space between planets as absolute. However, it later turned out that this does not apply to “unencoded” light, which can therefore, just like gravitational waves, travel faster than light (see article). Since the Danish astronomer Ole Rømer made the first measurements in 1676 following the eclipses of Jupiter’s moons, we meanwhile are now faced with light that travels faster than light. Well, the maximum is therefore not a maximum and then we no longer understand what physics means by the term “constant.” To add to the confusion, Einstein himself revisited this in 1920 when he stated in the book "Relativity: the special and general theory": . . . "according to the general theory of relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which constitutes one of the two fundamental assumptions in the special theory of relativity [. . .] cannot claim any unlimited validity.  A curvature of rays of light can only take place when the velocity of propagation of light varies with position." But the fact that, through the back door of his curved space, he - as he states here - again suggested the existence of an ether that causes variations in the speed of light, did not prevent modern physics from dismissing such variations as nonsense.  The Wikipedia page on this subject states, inspite: "The speed of light is the upper limit for the speed at which information, matter, or energy can travel through space":  and in this we see how a maximum is elevated to an absolute, even if “light without information, energy, or matter” - what would that even be? - might still be faster than the limit set for those sources of manifestation. C (celeritas, speed) is God, and the rest is relative, subordinate - end of story - so believes the modern physicist; otherwise, he is a fallen soul. The matter had been absolutized, the dogmatic evil had been done, and the psychology of theoretical consonance - a certain false pride of knowledge, so to speak - could no longer be reversed (see, among others, C.M. Will, "Was Einstein Right?" - Basic Books, 1986).

     The principle of relativity, on which Einstein based his later general theory of relativity regarding gravity, is also known as the equivalence principle, from which his postulate E=mc² later emerged. That original principle of equivalence, which dates back to Galileo Galilei (1564–1642), is mistakenly defended by our dear Albert as an absolute truth, as a law of nature. The principle holds that the inertial mass of an object is treated as equivalent to its gravitational mass. The difference between those two forces - namely, that gravity acts centripetally, while inertial mass acts linearly as a so-called vector function, i.e., perpendicular to, equal to, or opposite to that direction - was already disregarded by Newton, and Einstein based his notion of the independence of gravity’s action on that conflation of forces, on that loss of distinction. He equated gravity with artificial gravity, or the inertial force that a space probe accelerating at G imparts to its passengers. In fact, from a psychological perspective, the general theory of relativity is thus a rationalization of the inability to experimentally demonstrate a difference between these two forces. The artificial gravity you generate yourself with an accelerating spacecraft cannot indeed produce such a difference; that is quite logical. But why should that inertial force always act as artificial gravity? That is, of course, nonsense - or, to put it more precisely in philosophical terms, it is a fallacy, or sophistry, to assume that.

   It is a form of reasoning we often encounter in modern physics: “Suppose we approach the speed of light in a spaceship; then we become infinitely heavy.” Nonsense thus, considered  this way (see, for example, Stephen Hawking’s somewhat schoolbook-like account of this in "A Brief History of Time"). Einstein’s theory of gravity, then, never actually produced an anti-gravity machine. The real question that needs to be asked is, of course: "when do those two different forces decouple, apart from their direction?" Because when projected in different directions, they can still be the same. That decoupling will surely be necessary if you want to do anything with gravity. So, is that actually possible? Observations documented in millions of files by the so-called secret services around the world (embarrassment services, really; see, for example, Project Bluebook) show that flying saucers (UFOs) are indeed capable of defying the laws of aerodynamics in what one may call spacetime dynamics or spaciodynamics. But those observations aren’t “scientifically” valid because they aren’t reproducible; they are, in fact, (exo)cultural or supernatural. We lacked the experimental evidence to verify them, which is why we arrived at the remarkable insights of the theory of special relativity - about which the average person rightly says, “I listen to it, but I don’t understand it anymore,” much like we heard all sorts of strange things about the special theory of relativity when Michelson and Morley were unable to demonstrate the existence of the ether through their experiments using possible variations in the speed of light as an indicator. That formed the basis for the so-called second scientific revolution, and Albert Michelson was awarded the Nobel Prize for it in 1907, of all things.

   If someone makes you feel ignorant, it may very well be the realization of that person’s ignorance, but if you don’t want to see them as ignorant - because you’re paying their tuition, for example - then you should question yourself. If light is a particle, a photon, and space-energy forms a virtual or potential proto-material particle, then you understand that the relationship between light and the ether may be a little more complicated than what measurements of the speed of light can capture.  At the very least, this can certainly be stated as philosophically logical and linguistically and semantically sound. The earlier special theory of relativity, just like the later general theory of relativity, can therefore be viewed psychologically as a rationalization of the inability to prove the existence of the ether. With the insights from that rationalization that time is no longer absolute and is subject to gravity.... is it true or not true? ....we might then ask ourselves whether we are still on the right track here. The problem with rationalizations, from a behavioral science perspective, is that they do not necessarily contain falsehoods, but that truth is simply superfluous; they form more of a neurotic compensation pattern or a defense strategy of the ego that stands between you and reality like a cloud of thoughts.
   
 
5.4 Proof of the Contrary

    With the general theory of relativity, the principle of mass equivalence became a fundamental assumption; in other words, the principle that held true in certain cases became a general law from which we neither want nor are allowed to deviate - or, to put it better, we have adopted a paradigmatic dogma that effectively states: “I control it, therefore it exists.” But if, in accordance with this dogma, someone can experimentally demonstrate a difference between inertial mass and gravitational mass - or convert space-energy using a self-sustaining ether machine or Vishnu-yantra - then this bastion of logical heresy will be brought to an end, and both theories of relativism will crumble. And then suddenly, with the scales falling from our eyes, all the associated calculations are revealed to be an illusion of regularity, a rationalization the complexity of which is meant to conceal the lack of practical logic.

   If we can circumvent that illusion, that heresy that exists contrary to the common sense inherent in the other social and human sciences - psychology foremost among them - we are freed from the idea of learned helplessness, from the depression that the equivalence principle, that postulate, cannot be broken, and we are done with the energy question, and thus with this study. All karma yoga comes to an end. Leonardo must be set free. In other words, if that works - and why should someone as a yogi not be able to redeem that karma, since it is, after all, the grace of the Deity of Yoga (Yogis'vara) that makes this relatively easy to achieve - then relativistic calculation methods are just as useless and deceptive as the ether seemed useless and self-deceptive, given the problem we had in proving that apparently protomaterial substance through a successful and reproducible conversion of those ethereal spatial vibrations into kinetic energy.

   Religion has provided proof that we receive energy from the ether, since time immemorial, by offering communion with the Lord of the ether - called the Father by Christians - to those walking toward the church. But physics has not yet been able to claim this achievement, neither experimentally nor socially, except in lectures by professors who offer only a temporary course. In any case, it must be said here that, until relativism is thus overthrown, the reasoning set forth here amounts to nothing more than the condemnation of a condemned thing - that is, condemnation squared - or, in other words, amounts to being even more tedious and frustrating than the original rationalization. We need experimental evidence. That much is clear. And what is the situation now? In free energy research, as discussed in the previous chapter, we have encountered evidence that indeed indicates a departure from the principle of equivalence. One finds there concrete evidence of the ether as a source of energy (for we - faithful to thermodynamics - continue to maintain that energy cannot appear out of nothing, but can be transformed from something).

To be clear: We refer to a principle (dictionary: a fundamental rule or guideline) as a line of reasoning that holds true in a certain number of cases, but not in all of them (“my principles are not yet yours”). A law of nature (dictionary: a universally valid regularity) holds true in all cases; it is universal.

Bruce de Palma, the former MIT lecturer, was ostracized by the scientific community in the 1960s, more or less declared mad, due to his “heretical” experimental result that undermined Einstein’s theory of relativity: a spinning steel ball travels farther or shorter than a non-spinning ball, depending on the direction of its spin. Paramahamsa Tewari (photo left), an engineer who did take him seriously, later came into conflict with the Indian establishment when he replicated DePalma’s N-machine and effectively improved it (COP 2.5) with an overunity space energy generator (a 'Reactionless AC Synchronous Generator' - RLG), which he patented as lead engineer at the Indian Institute of Nuclear Energy.

   Finsrud, too, demonstrates with his gravitomagnetic device - his “Perpetuum Mobile” kinetic artwork - that the inert mass of the ball, kept out of equilibrium for  150 hours or more by the pendulums, through magnetism, offers extra energy, or surplus inertial mass movement, relative to its own gravitational mass. Apparently, according to these two formally unreplicated pieces of evidence from Finsrud and DePalma, it is therefore possible to experimentally refute the equivalence principle using rotations that cannot occur spontaneously in nature, and we can thus effectively set aside the insufficient logic of the theory of relativity. But of course, modern physics, with its idolization of Einstein as the supreme intellect, does not want to be dismissed that way as a double rationalization of its own experimental inaptitude. “What I cannot prove does not exist, and therefore the ether does not exist, nor does a violation of the equivalence principle”, is no acceptable reasoning, we cannot guarantee mental health that way.

   That kind of denial is for a psychoanalyst more of a symptom belonging to a cultural neurosis involving Oedipal denial and repression in relation to Father Time, and such a state of mind - provided this evidence proves solid upon replication, at least -  clearly shows that one with Einstein was in fact is a scatterbrain and that Tesla was therefore right when he spoke of modern (theoretical) physics as mathematical mysticism without much practical insight. Later in his life, Einstein’s intellectual faculties also declined considerably. That could have been due to old age, but it is more likely that his theory, as the psychological denial of something, showed no progress. We thought we were seeing therewith the absolute speed of light, but we ourselves didn’t really see the light of the future with it other than in in flashing mushroom clouds. We have made practically no progress beyond GPS technology and those reprehensible nuclear power plants, which are essentially modern steam engines. Einstein was unable to untangle the knot he had created with his initial rejection of the ether and his principle of equivalence - which he elevated to the status of an axiom - and was unable to achieve integration or arrive at a unified theory. Physics is thus, as it appears today, a collection of disparate experimental insights that, theoretically - despite all the speculation and particle accelerator research - lack unity, and whose theory reeks of denial and repression.

   The generally authoritarian, negative character of the average newly trained (immature, recent graduate) physicist - who tends to react with skepticism and judgment toward exceptions to the aforementioned principle, much as the Inquisition of the Catholic Church reacted with murderous and criminal fervor to spiritual experiments by citizens (persecution of heretics - is also cause for concern. So there must be something fundamentally wrong with modern physics education. It seems like a religious sermon with dogmatic followers who aggressively and defensively try to defend their highly paid field of study and dismiss us “laypeople” as ignorant. Is physics perhaps the newest religion? Are we supposed to just believe all that incomprehensible “intelligent” tampering with mathematical logic? And is television perhaps the modern idol of detachment, worshiping the false unification of standard time - which is rationally based on the denial and removal from its natural context of the absolute value of an eternally changing time that does indeed possess a momentary absolute equality we call the NOW - even though that Now is scientifically (and not politically) assigned a different number everywhere in nature? Surely we shouldn’t all see it that way… Didn’t Einstein say that science and religion couldn’t exist without each other because he liked to see physics wield the sceptre dogmatically? And of course there are more enlightened physicists (Bohm, for example).

      Following Einstein’s “conversion” to a new understanding of the ether - when, in 1920, he expressed regret over his radical rejection of the ether - the modern theory of the ether emerged, which was based in part on the work of physicist Wolfgang Pauli (1900–1958), who, with his exclusion principle, made a significant contribution to the quantum theory of Max Planck (1858–1945), which does allow for a type of ether particle that will be discussed below. According to the exclusion principle, normal elementary particles (fermions) are absolutely distinct in space and are therefore always a time product. Consequently, the ether - that is, the space described by matter - is equally an absolute given. In quantum mechanics, the ether is thus, from a theoretical physics perspective, an axiomatic given without which logical reasoning is impossible. However, the new ether theory, which was popularized in the 1980s by Maurizio Gasperini and brought back into the spotlight around the turn of the century by Ted Jacobson and David Mattingly, is still not generally accepted within physics at the beginning of the 21st century. This leads to discussions and attacks on that traditional relativistic stronghold that now seems to stand in the way of progress.

     For example, as recently as October 2007, there was an organic-physical chemist in the Netherlands named Marcoen Cabbolet (1967) whose doctoral defense, in the fall of 2007, wa - quite uniquely - canceled even though the doctoral committee had already approved his dissertation. Together with his late advisor Sergey Sannikov from Ukraine, he had discovered that, contrary to the principles of quantum mechanics and general relativity, there are theoretically entirely new sources for energy generation. The PhD Committee at Eindhoven University of Technology, which unanimously ruled that the research was of insufficient quality, later had to reverse that decision when it turned out that the committee itself was flawed. External experts were consulted, including our 1999 Nobel laureate Gerard 't Hooft, who said he “couldn’t make head or tail of it.” Cabbolet’s research could not be correct because it would imply that antimatter has a positive rest mass, yet moves away from Earth under the influence of gravity. But the supervisor, Harrie de Swart, stated that the dissertation consisted of a strictly logical framework with a physical interpretation. He wasn’t crazy, after all. Cabbolet replied that 't Hooft was guilty of empty rhetoric and that he apparently had not mastered formal logic. Cabbolet has not had anything published since then and had to take a job at KPN in the user support department.

    Among physically trained free-energy researchers, in addition to Tom Bearden and Stefan Marinov, Prof. Kanarev - known for his work on plasma electrolysis as discussed above - is also highly critical of the current state of natural science. Like Marinov, he argues that we must return to the classical physics of the 19th century and pick up the thread where we lost it. Following postmodernism, we are in need of a paradigmatic restoration to repair the relationship with the classical order that was disrupted in modernity. Marinov stated in his scientific testament: "I hope that the (Newtonian) concepts of space-time, which I have restored through numerous experiments and a simple mathematical theory, will soon be accepted by the scientific community as those that correspond to material reality." Kanarev adds: "I am thinking of a theoretical virus called the Lorentz transformations, on which the proof of Einstein’s theory of relativity is based. In Lorentz’s work, time and space were expressed in two separate equations and kept apart from one another. Only by reuniting these two equations is it possible to obtain a true description of the process. Whatever physical phenomenon might follow from the descriptions of Lorentz’s transformations, it is impossible to observe it in nature.” He argues that in the twentieth century we began to misinterpret our research findings; according to him, we have overlooked something." "Time, space, and matter - these are the three inseparable elements of the universe" (see interview). And this unity, which was already preached by the Buddha, is precisely the point we wish to make in this chapter. With the machines of direct energy extraction, we are dealing with the free energy of space. Without viewing time, matter, and space as a single, inseparable whole, we can never master this science. Not only in physics, but also in socio-economics, time and space have become two separate concepts in the twentieth century that no longer seem to have any relationship with each other. And with that, we have become alienated from natural reality and from one another, and we do not truly have a grip on the material world. This lack of social and scientific coherence regarding these basic concepts of physics - the holy trinity of time, space, and matter - lies at the root of the fundamental fragmentation of the old paradigm of relativism. In that old paradigm, we deny the ether, we distort time as legally defined, and we have no control over the planet’s matter, climate, and energy production. And thus, at the beginning of the 21st century, we are on the wrong track ecologically and psychologically, trapped as we are in political, scientific, and religious egos as if we were a bunch of sociopaths with TBR.

    An excellent lecture by a renowned scientist named Tom Valone is available online, providing an overview of the challenges facing science regarding free energy. Without delving directly into the theory, he conducted a major feasibility study focusing on the conversion of zero-point energy, taking into account recent developments in fields such as nanotechnology. He refers to the work of Casimir (vacuum pressure at the micron level), Dr. Fabrizio Pinto (see also video and an article), Mead, and Milonni, and he discusses and analyzes the core principles for converting energy from the vacuum. In doing so, he argues, just like Bearden, that these principles fall within the "thermodynamic, fluid, mechanical, and electromagnetic domains of the fundamental force phenomena applicable to all energy systems." For example, he also mentions recent developments in microdiodes which, as in Moray’s work, capture the vacuum energy that, in principle, fluctuates randomly but is very real and not merely virtual, as Bearden points out in response to many skeptics. He thus argues that this also applies to the quantum level of the (incomplete) theory of elementary particles. In addition to Valone, Bearden (see especially his videos *Energy From The Vacuum*; on Google: part 1 & part 2), and Kanarev, there are also individual and institutional studies by other scientists grappling with the paradigmatic energy question: Lee Felsenstein, who also studies energy systems for computers; Prof. Pharis Williams on alternative nuclear energy and antigravity (his site); and Mark Goldes in his article on Fueling the Future with Zero Point Energy (site), to name a few. The problem with the old paradigm is that the average person cannot understand it. Instead, people experience the chaos of postmodernism. And what one does not understand is difficult to put into perspective, accept, or reject. People only know that, in the current model of thought, it doesn’t really matter whether the clock is in sync with the sundial or not. With this relativity of the concept of time, time was stripped of its classical, absolute value. The absolute value of time that I. Newton assumed implied that the passage of the sun and moon entailed an unquestionable, uniform progression of the matter of the universe, which operates completely uniformly and identically everywhere. Einstein demonstrated that the concept of simultaneity, despite the equality of the Now, is nevertheless an illusory idea. As mentioned, he proceeded from the axiom of a constant speed of light in space. Time, he argued, is always and everywhere different; it is entirely relative. He also explained that the classical concept of the ether - the ether as a separate substance that is omnipresent - which Einstein had deemed unnecessary in physics by 1920, was relative: having later changed his mind on this point, he stated that according to him, the ether concerned space with physical properties, space in the form of a specific force field that operates differently for each planet, star, and galaxy. That force field makes a difference in its relationship with the force field of spacetime, which represents the expansion of the universe in a sort of fourth dimension of time in which all universes are moving apart. As for the ether, with this change in Einstein’s view in favor of the new, relative concept of the ether (which he began in 1916, see Kostro 2000), the problem arose that we can no longer regard physics itself as absolutely valid either (see also the article on Einstein in the info section of this site).These are, more or less, paradigmatic visions, opinions, or perspectives - certain forms of language consisting of self-defined terms - that function just like the explanatory models of historians, psychologists, sociologists, philosophers, and climatologists, for example, or as Tesla called it: a physical belief, a form of mathematical metaphysics in which the mystic in question takes center stage and it all comes down to the right conceptual “feel” for the matter. In physics, too, opinions, definitions, and methods vary, and these may consequently lead to different research results and measuring instruments. By accepting a relative ether, combined with the rejection of the relativism that refuses to acknowledge the ether at all, the undersigned now boldly joins the conversation within this freedom, basing his argument more on a practical psychological and classical philosophical perspective than on a physically and mathematically mystified standpoint, on the measuring instrument of the tempometer and the associated conceptual framework that serves as the guiding paradigm to string the arguments together into a coherent vision.

The Einsteinian "dimple" in spacetime upon which current
thinking about gravity and the aether is based.

In twentieth-century physics, the idea of the relative ether as presented here is initially consistent with what is known as scalar gravity theory. This is a theory in which gravity is described as an invariant field of particles with zero spin (so-called bosons) to which the time/space differences of the Lorentz equations - criticized by Kanarev - apply. Around the turn of the century, a new theory of gravity by David W. Allan, Ranae Lee, and Jeff Lorbeck from 1999 emerged. In this theory, the emphasis is on diallelic gravitational lines radiating from the core of all matter (as in our cakra design for a magnetic motor). In this view, the four fundamental forces of nature are unified into a single unified field theory. In a more recent development, since 2002, the term “Aether Physics Model” has been used (David Thomson III and Jim D. Bourassa; see also their book), which constitutes the third major revolution in physics after Dalton’s atomic theory in 1803 and Einstein’s theory of relativity in 1905. In this, once again aligning with the classical ether model, we view time itself as a form of energy that precedes the time manifest in the three-dimensional world: evolutionarily, the expanding, linear time of spacetime exists before the cyclical time of created matter. There are thus two fundamental forms of time: cyclical and linear time. Linear is the energy of motion that expands and leads entropically to chaos, and cyclical is the energy of a swirling time that leads to order, to structural phenomena, and forms patterns - bodies of matter with longitudinal and transverse waves and gravitational lines and fields consisting of particles. Viewed in this way, spacetime is pure primordial energy that can be expressed mathematically in the same way that material energy is expressed in the equation E=mc². We then begin the creation with the equation E=T.e². Energy is equal to the product of time and the absolute of expansion (where T is in fact delta T, or the change in time; see also the article “Scalar Wars”). One could also say that spacetime, the so-called fourth dimension, is a manifestation of energy in which time itself is still the primordial energy, the dark energy that is in fact merely a primordial potential of all cosmic energy in equilibrium. Only when that energy in the secondary ether (the ether of contraction) begins to swirl, becomes unbalanced, or loses its symmetry - as the 1957 Nobel laureates Chen Ning Yang, Tsung-Dao Lee, do energy particles emerge that are initially still ‘uncertain’: gravitons, gravitational particles, or ether particles that are nothing more than small, polar, yet still chaotic vortices of the primordial energy of time itself (formally with a spin of two and not zero). The Ether Physics Model puts it this way: 'The Aether has a dipole of two spheres, which arise as the oscillation of forward and backward time.' That graviton vibration forms the source of zero-point energy, vacuum energy, or radiant energy, as Tesla called it. Or as T.H. Moray put it: "Radiant Energy is particles of energy, just as light is wavelengths .." "Uncertain" here refers to the virtual presence or absence, visibility, or measurability of something that depends primarily on the measurement method or the paradigm used: that quantum mechanical "space foam" which Bearden calls the "bubbling" of the positive and negative aspects of the vacuum - in other words, the boiling or swirling of vacuum energy. Those gravitons form islands, or clouds in primordial space, islands of gravitational fields or spacetime dimples, a kind of gravitational mist (the Greeks called it aether or vapor). These islands are all interconnected, as René Descartes had already posited; he was one of the first to describe the self-organizing capacity of the universe in Part Five of his *Method* and in his unpublished work *Le Monde*. In this context, he asserted, among other things: “Empty space does not exist” (*Principia Philosophiae* XVI & XVII), as well as that all that exists is a transformation of the ether.

  A related historical precursor to the new ether model is Theodor Kaluza’s (1885–1954) 1921 Kaluza–Klein theory, which posits a fifth dimension that unifies gravity with the electromagnetic force. In this theory, the fifth, invisible dimension consists of compacted, or as the Swedish mathematician Oscar Klein (1894–1977) called it, “curled-up” space. The theory was recently (Sept. 2008) put forward by the Brazilian scientist Dr. Keppe in defense of the concept of energy as the result of the interaction with, and of, virtual fields and particles, or of what, from an evolutionary perspective, one might call protomatter of a higher level. According to him, Einstein’s formula E=mc² has led us to believe too strongly that we must have matter in order to obtain energy. However, matter is more accurately described as a condensate of (dark) energy. This theory, which he put forward along with the Aharonov-Bohm effect - which extracts energy from quantum potentials and serves as an explanation for Bearden’s MEG - would, in his view, refute that, and his Bedini-Newman-like super-efficient Keppe motor (the Keppien Scalar motor, with energy reduction up to 80%) would constitute the revolutionary proof of it. This idea of energy from a dimension other than the three or four we know of aligns with the later string theory, which posits multiple dimensions (10 in total) of vibrating, interconnected “strings” - vibrating, interconnected energy phenomena - rather than quanta or energy packets as fundamental particles. In this theory, the graviton or gravitational particle would be an unconnected, closed vibrating string that forms space. String theory thus becomes a Theory of Everything, a theory that unifies the four different fundamental forces of nature. In this context, the graviton would be merely an isolated vibration of time energy. Even though, according to Bohn-Aharanov, the graviton can be induced to manifest itself as a spatial response to a closed magnetic field, since it is not bound to the other dimensions, shift dimensionally, which is why gravity would be so weak, and perhaps that is also the reason for the apparent dimensional shifting (appearing and disappearing out of nowhere) of observed UFOs.

In their aetheriometrics, the Correas define it as follows:"Gravitons are transient, nonelectromagnetic massfree energy particles whose impulse (gravitational momentum) is anchored to the mass-energy of particles of Matter, but which are emitted from the local Aether medium (formed by the constant and ordered flux of dark massfree energy and cosmological lepton lattices). Both gravitons and antigravitons may also be formed and seated in the composite lattices composing the local Aether medium. Gravitons anchored to mass-energy particles are described mathematically and physically as being in a relationship of secondary superimposition with that mass-energy." Whereas Einstein speaks of a mass-to-energy ratio, the theory surrounding the graviton involves vortices of the primordial dark energy of time - that is, a momentum-to-energy ratio. These vortices evolve from the islands within the graviton clouds, giving rise to the electromagnetic fields in what Einstein called “curved space” around the celestial bodies “condensing” from the graviton vapor. At the local level, the gravitons manifest themselves in that condensation process in an evolutionarily further subdivided form: these then form the electromagnetically active matter particles in relation to the third ether, or the local ether of curved space. Following the initial expansion of space-time energy, the second phase was the distortion of space-time in the form of graviton fields, in which the polarization of gravitons into a field of attraction led, in the final stage of evolution, to the formation of electrons and protons with opposite charges (the clockwise and counterclockwise rotating time energy in a coil). Those two fundamental particles then reach a stable state together with the neutral component of the omnipresent space-time. And that neutral component can then be identified in the form of the neutrino particle. In his video 'Cut the cost of oil,' inventor Joseph Newman speaks of 'gyroscopic electromagnetic particles' that, when a magnet moves perpendicular to a coil in a certain direction, generate more current from that coil than is needed to rotate the magnet, because they then polarize as they are attracted from outer space by the rotating magnet. It is a method of energy production that works in two directions with a rotating magnet and thus demonstrates overunity. In one direction, we observe only a transformation of kinetic energy into electrical energy when we allow the reverse flow of what the inventor Gray called “negative energy” to dissipate through the Earth as interference. In the Aether Physics model, in connection with the graviton, one speaks of an “aether unit” with an internally opposite time direction consisting of a positive proton and a negative electron aspect that quantum-mechanically mirrors itself with an antiproton and a positron (image on the right). In that aether unit of the rotating field that forms space, the Aether Physics model posits three polarities: the electromagnetic, the electrostatic, and the gravitational force. However, where the model speaks of “reverse time” (see image on the right), we must make a caveat: time does not, of course, run backward; it merely changes direction. In Chapter Two, we already mentioned that there is linear and cyclical time. Cyclical time is the result of a change in the direction of linear time - from an outward-expanding, “forward” direction of the universe’s energy to an inward-directed, “reversed” direction in which matter ultimately collapses into itself as a black hole. However, because expansion predominates, a balance arises in the form of the energy, moved to inertia, of the still-dynamic matter that exists between expansion and attraction: cyclic time. So ultimately, we recognize the order of time in three forms: the two forms of linear time and cyclic time. The three bands with the three forms of space and thus also with the three forms of space-energy that we are working with in ether technology and which we also explained in chapter two. Zero-point energy thus represents "forward" time, vacuum energy represents "reverse" time, and radiant energy represents the phenomenon of cyclical time. The expansion corresponds to the cosmic zero-point energetic spacetime, the attraction to the universal vacuum space of a galaxy, and cyclic time is the time described by the local curved space of electromagnetic, radiant-active celestial bodies revolving around one another. Cyclical time is thus the time of matter, and so, from a scientific perspective, we are materially bound to the time described by the sun, the moon, and the starry sky. This set of natural rhythms thus forms the “master clock” that all human clocks must slavishly follow, just as in eighteenth-century France one also spoke of master and slave clocks at a local or place-dependent level of timekeeping. If the clock does not slavishly follow nature, then people themselves become slaves to the culturally neurotic, standard-time-political ego until they have learned their lesson. After all, you can only be free with the order of time if you see that order clearly before you; otherwise, you cannot choose whether to conform or not. Freedom does not lie in denying or resisting the natural order with time zones and averages, but in improvising individually according to circumstances. In a system of denial, there is only the unconscious compulsion to conform to a system that is itself inconsistent; that never feels right, and it causes psychological problems. To solve those problems, we must return to the natural order of time. It is easy to do individually - but not collectively - with a clock and a calendar that align with the sun and the moon, but what is at stake here is more: it concerns the entire scientific approach, the conceptual framework, the paradigm for dealing with the fundamental natural forces of time, matter, and space. The energy concept of our culturally manipulated time has become too destructive; it is too much at odds with natural reality.And that is why we are searching for the right method to solve that problem, as well as the psychological issue that goes hand in hand with it. With relativism, we have reached an impasse: nuclear power plants that do not operate sustainably and sustainable methods that are not efficient enough. Uranium is running out, the sun doesn’t shine everywhere and always with the same intensity, and so on. The search for a workable scientific formula based on which we can generate free energy from space as needed - the most ideal form of sustainable energy - therefore boils down to the search for the operational definition of what one might call time energy, the energy resulting from the interaction of the various forces  - expanding, contracting, and rotating - of time in conjunction with the force field of space, the ether. An ether machine is essentially a time machine that operates as efficiently as possible based on nature’s tendency toward rotation. We are searching for a yet-to-be-discovered law of nature governing time energy. This law describes the relationship between the parameters of rotation - an intrinsic aspect of material nature that is always available to us. All we need to do is engage or unleash that rotation in the correct way, in accordance with this law, using our ether machine. So with such a machine, we do not spin a rotor; rather, we simply allow that rotation - from which we wish to generate electricity - to occur or give it the right opportunity. This rotation of time energy is inherent to the ether unit, which forms the non-material, manifest basis of all material manifestation. The ether unit evolves with cyclical time, divided into molecular, electromagnetically bound dipoles of nuclei and electron clouds, all of which possess spin or rotation. In this way, the ether machines are somewhat like clocks: they must all time the ratios of spatial energy in order to capture and convert its drift and dynamics. Since we can refer to the gravitons, which are evolutionarily split in nature, as electromagnetic matter, one could in principle use a machine to create all forms of energy and matter from the gravitons freely available in the vacuum as raw material, in combination with the linear energy of the neutron. The replicator from Star Trek operates on vacuum energy. In cold fusion experiments, we are already seeing a kind of alchemy, or transmutation of elements, occur with the unexpected formation of atomic particles in the vessel that were not there before.

    In summary, there is a hierarchy of particles: a - the time particle of pure energy - the graviton, which is a double-spin “uncertain” energy particle of dual, forward and reverse time; and finally c - the manifesting triplicity of that energy in the vortices of the ordinary particles that form atoms, atoms that are then no longer virtual but visible, atoms that, once manifested, have entered into a specific relationship that we can find in the periodic table of elements. And so the energy question then boils down to a certain ordering of time, much like a Pythagorean tree grows: as a fractal that splits further and further, or like the crop circle to the left and right at the top of the page.

    Let’s go over this fundamental line of reasoning for the new paradigm once more: at the beginning of creation, there is first nothingness - “God’s slumber,” so to speak - then there is “awakening,” the linear time of expanding spacetime: dark energy, the pure energy of time that is nothing but linear expansion. Then, from that linear time, through a disturbed equilibrium, through a broken symmetry, a counterforce arises: cyclic time, as a division relative to that primordial ether. Thus, from space-time, the three-dimensional space arises, filled with gravitons or vortices of cyclic time - pure time vortices of the primordial ether. This final phase of light manifestation is what is depicted in the timeline of the cosmic order as currently conceived by science. In that view, manifestation occurs from the very beginning, and dark energy does not appear until later. But in a hierarchical view as presented here, there are preceding phases, and dark energy precedes manifestation. This transitions from E=t.e² to E=t.d²: time expanding (e²) first becomes three-dimensional (d²). Only then does matter materialize as a further subdivision of the gravitons in universal (secondary) space: they then form the local etheric spheres of curved (tertiary) space.

De tijdlijn van het kosmisch bestel vanaf de Big Bang volgens het oude model

This is consistent with the statement in physics that "it appears possible to regard curved spacetime as consisting of a condensate of gravitons," which we found on Wikipedia under the entry for quantum gravity. The initial expansion is consistent with Gurth's inflation theory from 1981. From E=t.d², we have arrived at E=m.c² with the manifestation of matter: the time energy E is the matter M bound to the speed of light (C²), which is then locally determined and depends on the distance to the singularity to which it seeks to return in order to find its original energetic equilibrium. As we saw earlier, the constant speed of light in the new paradigm is a relative constant and not an absolute constant. It is, in fact, the time factor that constitutes the constant of change in the three basic equations used to describe the various energy fields of the relative ether. The three forms of ether - that of expansion (e2), that of dimensionality (d2), and that of the speed of light relative to manifest matter (C2) - are thus present as the neutral, positive, and negative particles, respectively, from which our ordinary matter is composed. The expansion thus remains constant, and so all matter and space grow constantly, even though the ratio remains the same. The distance between the Earth and the Moon, which increases by a few centimeters each year, could serve as a measure of that growth. Neutrons are constantly being formed from the expansion of the primordial ether, which combines with the free gravitons of space to form matter. This new matter is, at the atomic level, a clone of all existing forms of matter, which then retains the same relative shape. On the planets, one can see signs of this in the form of cracks in the surface. Such striae or cracks can also be seen on the Moon alongside ridges several kilometers long that formed a billion years ago when the Moon temporarily contracted and cooled. After [and before] a period of contraction, expansion may very well have occurred. This view also offers an alternative explanation for continental drift on Earth, which can easily be assembled into a seamless sphere, as comic book artist Neal Adams demonstrates on his website. The theory originates from the Australian geologist Samuel Warren Carey (1911–2002), who has been forgotten in favor of the now-dominant theory of continental subduction - the stretching and sliding of continental plates under the influence of convection currents within the Earth. That theory could not explain the increase in water. But, if the entire universe is constantly expanding more than it is contracting - which is a proven and accepted fact within mainstream physics - why wouldn’t a planet expand as well? It simply makes sense. With the expansion of all matter in mind, we see lakes and rivers growing into oceans and landmasses drifting apart like a crust that is too tight around a Japanese nut. From a magnetic perspective, with this constant expansion, the entire creation forms a gigantic monopole that serves as the basis for the extraction of vacuum or ether energy. There is always free energy because there is always the movement of the expanding manifestation that seeks to return to its primordial source, to its singularity. It is through the interaction of the three basic forms of the ether in the form of elementary particles that a dynamic interplay of expansion and contraction occurs, a kind of constant integrity tension of all matter in the local ether which, on its way back to its origin, is then, under the influence of that constant pressure, in a cyclical motion in free space. This local ether thus constitutes a kind of fourth, holistic particle of matter that preserves the integrity of the relationships between matter - composed of protons, neutrons, and electrons - and space: we shall refer to this particle as the integron. Prior to manifestation, space consists of gravitons and universal ether particles, the virtual plus and minus particles that Tom Bearden calls photons and antiphotons. Upon the manifestation of matter, the gravitons split into protons and electrons, and the universal ether particle - the counterpart of the graviton - then splits into a local ether particle or an integron striving for integrity, and a neutron that forms the local representation of the expanding primordial ether. Thus, the four elementary particles, together with the relative, dynamic ether, form a parallel to the four fundamental forces known to physics: gravity (the graviton), the electromagnetic force (the electrons and protons), the strong nuclear force that holds everything together (the integron), and the weak nuclear force (the neutron, which eventually always leads to scattering and decay). To put it simply: first there is time, then its vortex, and then its division into the three fundamental particles of matter plus a holistic integrity effect that can also be described as the local ether particle or integron. The ether particles are always part and whole, are “part and parcel,” or holon particles - after the holon as the Hungarian polymath Arthur Koestler (1905–1983) and, more recently, the holist Ken Wilber defended it as a philosophical concept. The triple holon particle of the ether in our theory (triple in the three levels of the ether’s manifestation) serves as a model for the individuality of all organisms, or for the integrity of the materially manifested persons that we ourselves are. Where Wilber speaks of four quadrants in this regard, representing the dimensions of the individual versus the collective and the internal versus the external, we distinguish the matter here more in terms of quantity and quality (i.e., the individual/ social versus the concrete/abstract) in the fields of action that must guarantee a person’s integrity in relation to the order of time and the forces of the ether. Ultimately, the description of the manifest world is about dispelling the illusion that constitutes a difference between the inside and the outside. It concerns the order of life, the order of time that in fact constitutes matter - the matter we know, in relation to space, as an ethereal interplay of forces.

   In summary, evolution proceeds from potential time-energy, through the stage of actual, “dual” gravitational energy, to the final stage of electromagnetic energy - which is both differentiated and maintained as a holistic whole - the manifest energy of matter. Each evolutionary step reveals a new form of the relative ether, which, through interaction, constitutes the entire manifestation: the primordial ether, the universal ether, and the local ether - or, as Einstein puts it: spacetime, normal three-dimensional space, and the curved space surrounding celestial bodies. If we focus too much on the holon particles, we are holists, but if we view the counterpart of those particles alongside the particles of the normal ether and take into account the energetic effects over time in the fields of action that this produces, we are philognosists - people who can also unite spiritually in the love of knowledge. And this hierarchical reasoning is consistent with the conclusion reached by the many classical sages and scholars of the past who, like Descartes, consistently maintained that all matter is a transformation of the ether. Thus, Vyâsadeva states in the Brahmâ Sûtra (Adh2. P3: 1-7) that the pradhâna - or undifferentiated - ether is the first effect of creation, after which the other elements of the local order appeared, first the air (the “vapor”), and then fire, water, and earth (Bhâgavata Purâna 3.5: 32-36).

A tectonic fault line on the Moon that serves as evidence of the constant growth of planets and other celestial bodies.

    What is called antimatter - and is posited by modern physics as a necessary counterpart to the material development of time-energy as described above, Wilber’s “inner side,” so to speak - must undergo a corresponding evolution. Given our hierarchical classification, we cannot truly speak of an “anti-universe.” The material can be traced back to the same primordial source as antimatter. Both strive for unity and form only a primary duality in the universe, a duality that we already find as a necessity in the world’s oldest writings. God, as the integrity of the greater whole, as a person, would have existed from the beginning of creation according to ancient conceptions. That God cannot be seen and is timeless. The spiritual, with God, forms the timeless counterpart to matter, which, however, also comes from God. Matter forms the visible body of the God who states that you are not your body; matter is the gigantic form of the virâtha rûpa, as stated in the Bhâgavata Purâna 2.1. That God constitutes self-awareness as the counterpart to space-time. And that self-awareness reveals itself only secondarily as the duality of an ego in relation to the eternal bliss and love of God. The ego, or sense of self - which, when not identified with matter, is also called the individual soul - is known in the third instance, that is, yet another level of manifestation further, through the two elements of spirit and intelligence via the process of identification, a process sometimes called the falsification of the ego (ahamkâra). The counterpart to this is formed by the duality of man and woman, the god and the goddess, who live their love lives in bliss. And that love must, proceeding toward the unseen God, return once more to a shared self-awareness, a self-awareness governed by the Super-soul of the original person or integrity of the universe. In the meditations, the mind then becomes the enemy that must be subdued through intelligence and, turned inward, guided back to self-awareness via true self-realization. And that self-awareness can in turn be traced back to the primordial unity of God, the original soul that is physically called the singularity.

   And so there is an equally complex, parallel, mental, or spiritual reality that exists more as a timeless diversity above or alongside matter - as a reflection of it - than as a reality opposed to time. Thus, we speak of a material world and a spiritual world, a fundamental duality of realms of existence between which one moves in life. If we want a theory of everything, these worlds must be combined within this hierarchical-structural vision of the person and matter, within this new paradigm for the world order, so that everyone has a place in it, so that everyone can be respected, and so that conflicts can thereby be ended. Similarly, a cell biologist like Bruce Lipton speaks of a new paradigm in which science and spirituality converge, after he discovered that the cell membrane of a cell in an organic body transmits information to the cell’s contents, in other words, that we ourselves, as well as our place in the universe, determine our physical material order, even at the cellular level, and that genes do not so much command us but rather stand ready to serve us. The protein switches that govern our lives, he found, are primarily controlled by stimuli from outside the cell - by ourselves, by the environment, by the universe. The two worlds need each other and cannot exist without one another, just as space cannot exist without matter and time, and just as classical physics cannot do without antimatter. The entirety of hierarchical particle theory can then be represented as follows:

Starting from a single soul or all-connecting self that underlies the entangled spiritual/material quantum reality of what is also known as Ervin Laszlo’s information-bearing Akashic field or the Aeon Game, the game of the complex relativity of the hierarchical ‘conical matrix’ of the psychomatter of spacetime as formulated in the Aeon Theory by the French physicist Jean Emile Charon (1920–1998), the HDT leads us to a pyramid that describes the entirety of reality and thereby offers an alternative vision of the development, function, and meaning of consciousness and the theory of evolution, as we have come to view them differently since Teilhard de Chardin (1888–1955) spoke of the evolution of consciousness as well (see also a lecture by Gerrit Teule - “What Darwin Could Not Know” - based on his book on this subject). It is, in fact, a double Tetraktys, a double 1-2-4-8 version of the Pythagorean 1-2-3-4 symbol for the cosmos. In this triangle, which in the HDT represents both the manifest and the non-manifest, the order of the gradual, evolutionary emergence - in succession from the monad - of the dyad, the triad, and the tetrad as the basic division of creation is revealed. Respectively, these four traditionally represent the singularity of the primordial beginning of having zero dimensions, the unity; the duality of one dimension, of a line, of the polarity of the world; the triplicity of two dimensions, a flat plane, a balance of polarities in the word; and the quadruplicity of a three-dimensional world consisting of the four basic elements or fundamental forces of nature. The esoteric Pythagoreans even swore an oath to this symbol of eternal renewal:

Nay! By him that gave
our family the Tetractys,
which holds the Fount and Root
of everflowing Nature.

(Ou ma ton hameterai geneai paradonta Tetraktun, Pagan aenaou Phuseôs Rhizôma t' ekhousan).     

For the new energy paradigm, which we now understand as a theory of quantum gravity, we therefore absolutely need the concept of the ether - that is, the concept of the ether as proposed by Einstein after 1920, who defended the ether as being relative, because the concept of the ether simply describes in a single term the collection of natural forces and fields - or “spacetime ripples” - as we described earlier when discussing the natural primordial sources of energy that cannot be traced back to any other source. The collective term for the natural energy sources from which we draw energy through direct conversion rather than indirect transformation of the energy freely available in nature - as we propose here - is the ether, the ether that we, together with Einstein, define as space with material properties or as a force field, and not so much as a uniform, omnipresent substance. With the new machines, we can thus speak of ether machines. These machines, as discussed in the previous chapter, relate to one of these three basic forms of ether, or to a combination or interaction of the fundamental forces of nature with them - clarifying this matter requires further clarification and investigation.

    The new way of thinking must ultimately explain the various effects discovered by the inventors. An answer must be found to the question of how we can, in addition to what we saw in the section on unexplained phenomena (UFOs, crop circles, and aliens), explain the findings of the discussed experimental effects within a single coherent framework.

i) The Stubblefield effect of electricity generated from the Earth’s magnetism.

ii) The Keely effect of energetic processes and antigravity resulting from the control of sound frequencies.

iii) The Reich effect of orgone energy from crystal configurations with tubes and temperature differences between organic and inorganic matter.

iv) The radiant Tesla/Moray effect of the energy from plates or rods that charge themselves electrically from nature, which may consist of different metals or alloys.

v) The Papp effect of noble gases discharging with an impulse in a pressure chamber.

vi) The Gary/Finsrud effect of continuous motion resulting from the interaction of magnetic force and gravity.

vii) The Gray/Johnson/DePalma/Tewari/Bedini/Bearden effect of a magnetic overunity torque with a backward energy peak following interrupted (electro)magnetic fields in motors operating on the basis of (electro)magnets.

viii) The electrostatic Baumann effect of overunity static electricity generated via a Whimshurst-like setup combined with a storage unit.ix) The cold fusion plasma process, or the electrolytic production using steel electrodes of a Meyer/Williams/Kanarev effect involving HHO gas or Brown’s gas generated with overunity efficiency from pure water without electrolytes, including the properties of flammable, charged water or water vapor.

 x) The Schauberger/Frenette/Griggs vortex effect of energy generated from vortices of water, air, or oil.

xi) The Hutchison effect of antigravity using electromagnetic vibrations and energy from compressed crystals.

xii) The Searl/Sweet effect of energy generation and antigravity through vibrating magnetic fields or rotating, diallel-arranged, and electrically controlled magnetic fields.

 According to the theory, there may first be a primary effect resulting from the researcher’s mindset. It is not uncommon for the effects to be difficult to replicate or unstable, even in the hands of the inventor himself. It requires constant conviction and sound experimental discipline to oversee and control everything in the frontier of science formed by this field of research. The influence of the factors of time and regularity should not be underestimated, as they are difficult - even for a physicist - to separate from the electromagnetic environment of which the researcher himself, with his body and conditioning, is a part. The effects observed by Johnson, Hutchison, Sweet, Keely, and de Palma appear to be examples of problems in this category. The influence of the experimental setup is consistent with a finding in quantum theory, in which the influence of the experimenter could not be ruled out. In the so-called double-slit experiment (see image on the right, video), electrons, photons, and even some molecules behave like waves with an interference pattern, as if they were part of the ether, when they are sent through two slits. But when measurements were taken to observe exactly what was happening, they suddenly behaved like particles without that interference pattern. The measurement thus determined the outcome of the experiment; the ether did not manifest itself when one attempted to measure it. This gives us pause when working with our ether machines. With this new approach, as Tewari also discusses, a certain mindset - combined with a specific temporal order and discipline of spatial and material self-control - is indispensable. If order is not maintained mentally and intellectually, or if a certain logic or reason is not followed, the hierarchical logic on the material side will also be undermined, and intelligence will not function properly at that point. Because the researcher - and later the user as well - is part of the application, he must adapt his methodology of research, education, and use. This is an issue that also falls within the scope of behavioral science research in psychology. At this point, we can say that, with our bodies, we ourselves are ether machines that interact with similar mechanical constructs. Inventing a self-propelled ether machine is more or less equivalent to developing self-knowledge and self-actualization in a process of emancipation. One develops a system involving the ether that only becomes real when one acts in accordance with it, whether or not a mechanical application is involved. We are thinking here of the way in which the Baumann effect (viii) exists in the world. Certain forms of energy use apparently require a certain mental discipline and harmony with the ether, and so it may well be that we must add this argument to our four reasons for why this technology cannot simply be introduced to the general public - specifically as an addendum to argument 1: our community’s discipline regarding time and the ether may not meet the conditions under which we can apply this technology. It is perhaps no coincidence that the undersigned himself maintains an alternative sense of time and is thus able (to a certain extent) to bring order to this matter. It does not sound illogical that the penetration of this new technology into science also depends on the discipline of the scientist himself. As long as that discipline does not improve, neither will the result of the work nor the fate of the world associated with it. The world will only be better off if we behave better with it. Naturally. It seems that Prof. Kanarev is correct when he states: if we do not treat time, space, and matter as a holy trinity of physics, then we fall, even scientifically, into the incoherence and chaos of isolated phenomena that are paradigmatically incomprehensible and that thus make the matter seem more like an individual skill than a form of technology or science that functions independently of individuals. Without being united in a proper temporal order and mastery of the forces of the relative ether (as a yogi can be), one may give up too quickly on developing in this area; one easily becomes the victim of certain psychological issues arising from the tension between natural temporal conditioning and culturally bound temporal conditioning, and we build nothing and even lose the synergy to live together because the energy or attention goes ‘elsewhere.’ And as a result, we fall into disbelief and skepticism, bringing us back to the first of the four obstacles. If, on the spiritual side of the temporal phenomena of the relative ether, we must take into account different levels and methods of mastering ourselves with the forces of the ether, then on the material side there are naturally also different types of ether machines or other transformations of primary energy that depend on and are suited to different individuals and communities. A saint can sometimes levitate on their own - something the Pope hates, by the way - while an ordinary citizen would likely need to obtain a special pilot’s license to be allowed and able to operate an anti-gravity vehicle. Let us attempt to describe the possible forms of understanding and control, thereby testing the explanatory power of our hierarchical particle theory (HDT).  In doing so, we will partly recapitulate what has gone before and then proceed speculatively and abstractly in our attempt to organize and explain the effects of the ether machines and to attribute properties to the various forces and particles of matter that play a role in these processes. What follows is therefore a preliminary description, an initial assessment, or a general outline of the order of nature with which we are dealing. We do not intend to discuss the entirety of quantum physics here, with all its fine subdivisions. That is the domain of theoretical physics.

 The concept of the ether, as we are initially familiar with it from radio transmission, applies to the various force fields found around planets and stars. This initial concept of ether is derived from what Einstein called curved space, the “dimples” in spacetime, and thus we are referring to the local ether. According to the HDT, the curved space of the local ether is nothing other than the residual product of the materialization process in which gravitons polarize. The local ether (the integron) forms the integrity of atoms consisting of protons, electrons, and neutrons. The integron, as it were, forms the surface tension of the material  world. The neutron is the anti-integrity particle that, as the counterpart to the local ether particle or integron, keeps the protons and neutrons separated in the nucleus of the atom. The neutron seeks to transform the cyclical time of a local material particle into a linear time particle. One could also call the neutron an anti-integron. The neutron is, as it were, a small fragment of the holistically permeated, linearly expanding space-time known in India as pradhâna. The polarity of the atom prevents the neutron and the integron of the local ether from canceling each other out and dissolving into universal space. The gravity surrounding a planet is the result of the sum of the force of the integron - a relative measure that depends on the universe and one’s position within it -and that force leads to a condensation of the gravitons, attracted by the neutrons, the individual ether particles that permeate the matter and exert a certain pressure upon it. Gravity is in fact zero-point magnetism, the unipolarity of the vacuum, a universal monopole that exists by virtue of the fact that there is more expansion than contraction in the universe, and electricity is nothing other than polarized gravity. The ether machine converts gravity into electricity by making the linear integron of gravity cyclical. With such a machine, one thus converts the graviton pressure of the integron into usable energy; one simply gives a twist, so to speak, to that linear space-energy, which is in fact overunity time-energy. With the magnetic polarization of the graviton, we then observe electrical phenomena, and vice versa. This is the HDT perspective on the relationship between gravity, magnetism, and electricity, which we will need to work with in the following. In this perspective, the polarization of the graviton logically always results in a bipolar magnetic field; after all, the unipole of space - which manifested as the integron of gravity - was split. This gives us an idea of the interplay of forces we are dealing with in this research.

    For the sake of convenience, we’ll refer to the individual force - the intensity of the graviton - as “normal” on a scale of five. The scale consists of infinite, hyper, super, normal, and zero. We call the force of the universal monopole “hyper” and that of the original spacetime “infinite.” We call the force of the proton and the electron “super”; the hyperforce of universal space and the normal force of the ether particle combine, upon polarization of the graviton, into two oppositely rotating superforces that are kept separate by the neutron, which, as a particle, has no effective force. The only force of the neutron consists of its ability to be anti-integer or dissipative as the local representative of time-space; in relation to the other two material particles, it has no charge or intensity. It is an antiholon particle that exists only in relation to the integron, which has an opposite time direction or mass, and, like its counterpart, exerts no (cyclic) force, has no intensity, and possesses neither spin nor charge. We call the cyclical a force because the cyclical is always linked to manifestation, whereas this is not necessarily the case with the evolutionarily older space-time and its ethereal counterpart in the universal ether. So there can be mass - a direction of time - without manifestation: dark energy. The linear does not constitute a directly usable force; the inward- and outward-directed linear space are, more or less, the father and mother of all forces. Force, and thus also intensity, manifests as a form of resistance against those parents, as a certain relationship of the manifested in relation to that fundamental linear duality; the manifested, which is itself always cyclical in nature, plays a game with it, as it were, at the interface of existence, the membrane of the here and now that we call reality. A spatial particle that acquires a charge, as is the case with a magnetic field, is therefore not an integron but a graviton, which inherently possesses a chaotic charge and spin and a normal intensity. The graviton and the integron are related vertically. You must think vertically, not horizontally, to understand this. They can lead to one another, just as elements in chemistry can combine or be separated; however, this involves a hierarchical evolutionary process of materialization and dematerialization. If you accelerate neutrons in a cyclotron or deploy them with a weapon, you will always receive other “chaos particles” in return that exhibit a mathematical relationship to the forces that were applied. One never really has a single neutron, but rather the effect of the destruction caused by it or of it itself. Similarly, one cannot detect the graviton as an independent particle in a particle accelerator because, once it is given mass and direction through its velocity, it simply can no longer be a graviton. The machine destroys the very definition of such a massless, chaotic spatial particle. We will leave aside here the detailed description of the fine-grained particle physics of bosons and fermions. The primary focus is on a general outline of the logic of the fundamental relationships of the forces of nature in the form of particles, not on experimentally discovered, more or less self-created, exceptions to or refinements of that logic. That is why one also speaks of push-pull rotation technology.

    The pressure exerted by gravitons in the form of the integron is the reason why the ether is relative and not homogeneous. The difference between the integron and the graviton is that the integron has a linear function, whereas the graviton is cyclic. The linear integron is the local representative of the cyclic universal ether, of which the graviton is the individual particle that rotates (has spin) and forms a dual polarity in the form of the alternating positive and negative “foaming,” 'bubbling,' or 'boiling' of space as undirected or 'uncertain' (time) energy. The integron, like the neutron, is mass without manifestation, except that the neutron has a mass we call one plus a nihile fraction heavy, while the integron forms only a nihile-heavy fraction that exists thanks to manifestation. The nihile is the difference that arose from the broken symmetry of the singularity from which everything emerged since the “awakening of creation” (why a bang?); the nihile constitutes the difference between everything (1) and nothing (0). The nihile is the overunity of the universe that we are seeking with the ether machines. It is zero-point energy that is not directly accessible or usable without giving it a “twist.” But to say that this energy does not exist is the same as saying that gravity does not exist. Gravity is the normal manifestation of zero-point energy at the local level. That is why the gravity wheel and the machines developed by Gary and Finsrud (vi) - which counteract gravity using magnetic force - also belong to the category of ether machines. The term “gravity” is, in fact, a misnomer. It creates a linguistic paradox: gravity is a force that does not simply constitute an effective, usable source of power, and yet it is not a force in the traditional sense either. It is a force that is not truly a force, but merely constitutes spatial pressure or “gravitational” force. The force of the gravity of something is the manifestation of the imbalance of the universe. A dam generates electricity from hydropower, not from gravity. Hydropower actually comes from the sun’s energy, which evaporated the water; when this water condenses and flows down from a higher elevation, it is released again as we block that flow with a dam. In fact, when we measure mass, we are not measuring the gravitational force of an object, but rather the inward-directed, negentropic time direction of a material object, which depends on its distance from the planet or whatever generates gravity. Move a little further into space, and that force is gone. What is sometimes present and sometimes absent, we call an illusion - an illusion of force, in this case. What truly exists is the integron, the surface tension of manifestation. The integron constitutes a linear time-energy that contracts in parallel at a single point, rather than a force that invariably produces a measurable weight. In space, there is no discernible surface tension beyond the cohesion of matter, and thus there is no weight either. In space, there is a balance of space particles, of gravitons, which are then undirected and cannot find a significant surface of attraction to manifest the integron of overunity to such an extent that there would be anything like gravity or direction. The ether machine brings order to the chaos of the free space particle known as the graviton. Finsrud deliberately introduces a mechanical order into gravity by first setting up the magnetic force chaotically with his central pendulum and then allowing the space pressure to bring linear order to it through balancing pendulums. Gary creates confusion by tracing gravity back to its point of origin via a neutral zone in the magnetic force and the turbulence of polarity-reversing diamagnetic material (vi). The integron involved in the process of energy extraction from space is a holon particle, a local manifestation of the totality of space-energy. It therefore has no significant mass, spin, or charge; it merely represents a direction of time: the inward-directed linear time that contrasts with the outward-directed linear time direction of the analogous neutrino particle. Viewed this way, one can conclude that the ether machines, running at full speed, generate gravity - specifically, their own gravitational field- which is caused by drawing in the surrounding gravitons and converting them into energy. A gravity generator can generate more gravity than a planet and thus create "anti-gravity" - a space-time discrepancy that can have an enormous kinetic effect when the direction of the suction is directed through a magnetic portal. After all, gravitons respond to magnetism. This is consistent with observations of such effects in flying saucers: electric fields become disrupted and G-forces no longer apply. As gravitons are drawn in by the ether machine, they acquire a linear direction that forms its own gravitational field - a field that can be directed in relation to other gravitational fields, thereby making the control of such a vehicle possible. The ether machine is thus a gravitational generator that manipulates the relationship between linear and cyclic time, the relationship between the “parents” and the “children” of the fundamental forces of nature.

    A magnetic field is the result of the alignment of particles (or groups of particles) in a magnetizable (or diamagnetic) object, such as the iron particles in the Earth’s core, for example. Magnetic lines form streams of gravitons rotating against the polarization. Some speak of electrons and ions, but in essence, space is the domain of gravitons, the materially as yet undefined space. Based on the magnetic fields surrounding bodies, magnets, planets, etc., space thus functions kinetically and not statically. All matter is in motion by virtue of the cyclical nature of matter. If the ether did not perform any work, the development of the ether machine would be pointless. The ether machines that already exist therefore simply constitute experimental proof that the ether exists. The evidence based on scientific observations of the expanding universe (via the Doppler effect in astronomy), the gravitational lensing around black holes and galaxies, and the rotating planets and moons, constitutes the non-experimental or observational physical evidence of the dynamic force field of space that we refer to here as the relative ether.In its simplest form, this has already been demonstrated by a magnet that sticks to an iron surface - such as a refrigerator - without any additional adhesive or support. The bonding of matter based on magnetic fields is, in fact, grounded in the HDT’s law of singularity, which states that all matter naturally strives toward its singularity. A magnet will therefore always try to cancel out its own polarity, form a ring, or stick together with opposite poles. This is classically known as the natural tendency toward order, negentropy, the counterpart to the natural tendency toward chaos known as entropy. Every force has a counterforce that attempts to cancel it out. Thus, entropic expansion is opposed by negentropic attraction.

    Similarly, an electric current flowing in a certain direction according to a specific measurement method, as well as a magnetic dipole that - as can be demonstrated with iron filings - generates a specific force field, is subject to a natural reactive force from space: the spatial energy that we describe, in the form of particles, as a field of gravitons - a field that we experience as gravity. Gravitons form the space pressure that, acting together on a celestial body as a holon called the integron, locally compresses matter linearly. The graviton itself is, as mentioned, chaotic and cyclical, but when massively attracted by a material object or a magnet, the gravitons form lines or currents running from positive to negative, which then cause the integron to lose its normal equilibrium somewhat and, as it were, cause its gravity to increase here and decrease there. Less gravity is magnetic repulsion; more is magnetic attraction. This combination means that the object does not become heavier or lighter as a result of magnetization, but according to the HDT, this is the case when an artificial monopole is created using an ether machine by converting gravitons into energy. If electrical charge is then collected based on magnetic rotation, something happens to gravity. At a sufficient frequency of the relevant dipole, an electric charge will throw the gravitation integron out of balance or into a vortex, thereby transforming it into a stream of gravitons that is sent away to the electrically opposite position of the Earth or into a light effect (as observed in Searl and Sweet - xii). The negative pressure of the resulting integron will then, as mentioned, lead to reduced gravity and, even in an integron vacuum, to spacetime distortions. The object then disappears to another location via spacetime or hyperspace. It is known from experiments, for example, that a capacitor becomes slightly lighter when charged: this is due to the so-called Biefeld-Brown effect. A charge ionizes the space around it and thus acquires a force of opposing gravitons acting in the direction of the polarity. This force is greater than what the ion wind -a form of electricity that is more or less conducted through the air -can explain, which is normally cited in explanations of the effect, according to Andrew Johnson’s analysis (see also the Electrohydrodynamic EDH Propulsion). Gravitons are cyclic time particles. Similarly, when the magnetic field is interrupted by moving the magnet or cutting off the current that magnetized it, a reaction occurs on the part of the gravitons, which then polarize with an electrical impulse in the opposite direction. The passive gravitons are subject to a kind of law of inertia because their intensity is less than that of the charged ones, which increasingly resemble electrons. Based on the law of singularity, gravitons have an inexorable tendency to constantly restore equilibrium, so that they counteract a positive field with a negative field. If a positive field disappears, the negative field automatically remains, and vice versa: the fingerprint that releases energy as it dissolves. This energy is extra energy because it flows based on the natural graviton pressure that acts uniformly in the form of the integron from all sides in space. This extra energy cannot simply be measured with equipment designed to measure a normal electric current. But what you cannot measure still exists. Conversely, a filament still emits light.The negative current is the overunity generated by a slightly overzealous universe that, proportionally, adds a tiny amount of energy to compensate for the lost field. The ether machine therefore continuously accumulates this energy in a capacitor, a battery, a flywheel, or another form of oscillation or rotation that causes the mechanical snake to bite its own tail, thereby amplifying the impulse. In this regard, the universe is not a trampoline or a spring that gives back what you put into it; after all, with the constant expansion of spacetime and the associated universal space, there is, as mentioned before, always an additional pressure. An ether machine is, so to speak, simply a valve for the extra energy in the universe. Just as a balloon flies away when you let the air out, an ether machine starts running once you have created a magnetic portal through which the constant graviton pressure can find an outlet.

    This explains the energy generation of Bearden’s motionless generator, which operates by rapidly channeling space energy through a switch into another circuit by interrupting an electromagnetically generated field. The other electromagnetic machines by Gray, Zsabo, Bedini, Tewari, and DePalma, as well as Searl’s SEG, can also be explained in this way (vii & xii), they all draw in space energy from the graviton pressure by creating a magnetic portal and/or a cyclic motion of the magnets, thereby generating an integron vacuum that attracts additional gravitons. Initially, this does not yet produce anti-gravity because the energy draw is too small. But in principle, such a machine without negative fuses can become ice-cold and lighter or even start to float when overloaded. The latter could be called a sort of ethereal meltdown, or rather an ethereal freeze-up. It is also possible, without switches or circuits, to capture a fluctuation in the Earth’s magnetic field - generated by the Earth’s rotating core - which then produces an electric current when a coil is placed in the ground. The variation in the magnetic field is a natural phenomenon. This explains the Stubblefield effect (i). Steven Mark’s ring generator also makes use of the variation in the Earth’s magnetic field. It causes that movement of the magnetic field to rotate through a port in its double coil, which is why it reacts differently - or not at all - when the device is held upside down. But the Johnson aspect of this effect with permanent magnets without an electrical circuit is also explained in this way: the repelling magnets, moving in a cyclical-sequential manner, generate their own momentum as if a snake were biting its own tail. In his view, overunity arises from the mechanically alternating magnetic field that constantly seeks out the gate, thereby providing cyclical mechanical motion - much like a donkey is lured forward with a carrot while the driver sits on the cart. The rotation of the Perendev machine must also be based on this effect, even though it could not be verified or replicated. Johnson’s original patent application does show something like this. The diallele organization of the graviton flow so that a sort of focal point or point of force is created that performs work with a stator - in his case in the form of curved magnets - is a prerequisite for this, just as it works in the Torbay setup with a curved graviton field that delivers more work on one side than on the other. Difficult to achieve, as evidenced by the many failed replication attempts, but theoretically possible provided that a second force - gravity or inertial force (gravity in a different direction) - is involved. For kinetic energy, we need two forces or two different effects of time, such as expansion and contraction. This principle of energy arising from the interaction of fundamentally different forces is clearly evident in Finsrud’s work, but exactly how it works in Johnson’s theory and its variants is not entirely clear. Given the replication issues in this area, including those involving Searl, many suspect a culture of make-believe. There is a great deal of skepticism among independent researchers regarding the feasibility of the magnetic motor. Inducing a mechanical pulse directly from permanent magnets requires precise adjustment of the strength, distance, any shielding, and the relative sizes of the magnets. Only with a perfect balance can the imbalance of the universe be captured. The Steorn Forum’s OC MPMM project also demonstrates this replication problem. It is no easy task to find the right balance of forces to control the etheric turbulence. The machine naturally seeks equilibrium - a magnetic lock with the integron - but if this is prevented by mechanically pressing the repulsive fields together in such a way that they have an exit through a gate (a 'gate') or create an integron vacuum through rotation, a movement arises akin to a rocket that, trapped in a circle, amplifies itself until the graviton pressure is fully processed. With a small OC MPMM unit, a speed of 5,000 rpm was already achieved, which reportedly lasted for up to seven hours. The excess pressure is then converted directly into a mechanical effect without being polarized in an electronic circuit. The rapid magnetic rotation, with a specific frequency and balance of forces, manages to create an integron vacuum, draw in gravitons, and convert them into mechanical energy. Unfortunately, however, the person responsible for this feat was recognized as someone who frequently makes a mockery of expectations...

    Similarly, Saboris’s Papp motor (v) operates purely on the basis of graviton pressure, without relying on the polarization of a reverse current in an electronic circuit or the capture of magnetic overunity in a mechanical loop: the noble gases induce a mechanical torque in the gravitons via the electrical discharge in an electromagnetic field. The graviton density explodes, so to speak, likely because the energy of the noble gas atoms increases to such an extent that the neutron feels compelled to draw in reinforcements from spacetime. This triggers a reaction from the graviton pressure, which is then proportionally too low and serves to amplify the electromagnetic field. The extra supply of that energy is then dissipated in the conventional manner via a standard piston engine system into mechanical energy and heat: the noble gas charges and discharges itself and is scarcely consumed. It primarily acts as a catalyst for space energy. Another effect that may play a role here is the so-called Electrum Validum, or High Density Charge Clusters (HDCC), consisting of groups of condensed electrons that can be experimentally generated by discharging a high voltage of direct current using the Casimir effect via a so-called cold plasma - a special gas - from a tip in a magnetic field using a very short pulse. When these clusters - initially called EVs (electromagnetic vortices) and later renamed EVOs (exotic vacuum objects) - coalesce into rings of 20 or 50 microns and strike an object, they release energy that exceeds the input by up to 91 times. The thermal process, which does not emit any neutron radiation, thus draws energy from space. The rings of electrons - whose existence contradicts existing physical theories that cannot conceive of a grouping of electrons that normally repel each other - actually form a kind of materially observable valve for space pressure, which then leads to a thermal conversion of the gravitons. The effect, which essentially represents a packet of electrical charge in a visible form, was discovered in 1980 by experimental physicist Kenneth R. Shoulders of Bodega, California, who, cleverly circumventing a looming government cover-up, obtained a patent for it in 1991 (U.S. 5,018,180.0). Secrecy was almost imposed due to the fact that, in principle, this technology can be used to create radiation weapons that do not need to be reloaded and that disintegrate all matter they strike. He also received a similar patent in 1992 (U.S. 5,153,901), and in 1999 (U.S. 6,271,614) he was granted a patent for a so-called electromagnetic plasma-drive generator that he developed. Inventor Christopher Arnold also refers to electron clusters and the Electrum Validum in the description of his 2001 super-efficient plasma fusion motor generator, which runs on neodymium magnets (not discussed above, U.S. 6271614) - a concept to which Bedini and Sprain also refer. Presumably, these same electron clusters played a role not only in the Magnatron cold fusion precursor developed by Rory Johnson, but also in many other discoveries we discussed. With EVO technology, Shoulders argued in 2007, it is in principle possible to create space propulsion and a defensive shield using the same technology, though the latter requires considerably more effort than producing the weapon. Truly Star Wars, then. May the force be with you, for even a world-destroying Star Wars EVO sword can be manufactured this way. Shoulders further developed the process with his son Steve. The discovery, which researcher Hal Fox claims should be considered the greatest of the 20th century, marks a milestone in the formal recognition of the possibility of converting space energy into usable electrical energy. Together with Fleishman and Pons of cold fusion, he should receive the Nobel Prize, according to Fox. Ken Shoulders also mentioned a connection between EVOs and the Hutchison effect at the MIT conference on Cold Fusion technology in 2005. In addition, the Russians Alexander Ilyanok from Belarus, and Mesyats and Baraboshkin from Yekaterinburg, conducted further research to advance this “charge cluster” technology, and Stan Gleeson from Cincinnati, Ohio, together with Dr. Shang Xian Jin, discovered that the process also works in water and can effectively reduce radioactivity. With these alternative possibilities for developing applications, HDCCs are also coming into focus in explaining the water processes in the free energy sphere (literatuure, artiles pages 1, 2, 3, 4).

HDT-elementen	mass	charge	spin	intensity	time
spacetime	infinite	infinite	none	infinite	+ linear
universal  ether	0	0	half	hyper	cyclic
graviton	0	±	double	normal	cyclic
integron	nihil	0	none	geen	- linear
neutron	1 + nihil	0	half	geen	+ linear
proton	1- nihil	+	half	super	cyclic
electron	nihil	-	half	super	cyclic

The key players in the HDT and their presumed properties:
the graviton is the guest player, and the local ether is recognized in quantum mechanics as the integron..

In the electrolysis methods developed by Kanarev, Stanley Meyer, and Bill Williams (ix), water is electrically charged; this charge, in accordance with the polarity of the electrolysi - specifically through a “catastrophic dielectric breakdown” of the accumulated charg - yields additional energy by altering the energetic basis of the integron within the individual water molecule. Due to the “energetic strain” specific to a water molecule, that integron must process an additional influx of gravitons; the energy of the water molecule increases, but the dominant neutron that counterbalances the integron is not pleased with this - that neutron must compensate by drawing from spacetime for additional support, and that extra energy causes the water molecule to fall apart - after all, there is extra integron and neutron energy for that - and also creates a residual potential in the water that, like a chain reaction, continues to run its course for quite some time before the proper neutron/integron equilibrium corresponding to the water’s vibrational frequency is restored. '"The volts of voltage are converted into amps of current, causing the water to break down into hydrogen and oxygen," as Dr. Peter Lindeman Meyer’s work explains. Charged water can ignite because, with the residual production of hydrogen and oxygen, the combustion process can, as it were, draw the charge out. If the charge escapes somewhere in that water, the rest of the charge tries to fill the gap to distribute the charge evenly, and this continues until the charge is too low to release flammable Brown’s gas. Once burned out, the water returns to normal. When charged, it is more or less graviton water - water with an energy level too high for the normal vibrational frequency of water - which you could also call unstable water, water that is on the verge of exploding. Even though the charge was built up by electricity, it is therefore not an electrical discharge but a gravitational discharge that occurs gradually as the "agitated" water slowly "relaxes" again.

    This effect of water with an incorrect vibration frequency that yields energy upon dissociation is reminiscent of the Keely effect - the influence of sound vibrations on the vibration frequency of various types of matter (ii) - and the Hutchison effect (xi), which achieves the same result through a different mechanism. It was already known that cows and plants perform better when exposed to classical music than to pop music. The interference of different vibrations results in a corresponding charging of the matter, which then is no longer “itself,” thereby affecting the integron value and space-time ratio of the matter, so that a way out is sought or a place that better suits the new vibrational frequency. Every planet has its own vibrational frequency related to the planet’s circumference. Scientifically, this has been called the Schumann frequency since 1952; it is an ultra-low frequency (ULF) that varies for Earth between 7.8 Hz (standard) and 33.8 Hz, with 59.9 Hz as an overtone. It consists of the resonance number of, for example, lightning flashes in the cavity formed between the Earth’s surface and the ionosphere. This means that the light from a lightning flash circles the Earth 7.83 times in one second, and thus the Earth provides that number as its fundamental resonance frequency. A higher vibration number would therefore correspond to a smaller planet if the speed of light elsewhere were equal to that of this solar system or galaxy. But we have already seen that the speed of light must be a relative constant related to the distance from the center of the galaxy in question. Thus, you can have roughly the same vibration number with a planet very different from ours, or the same planet in a different galaxy with different light-speed ratios. So be careful with alternative electromagnetic frequencies and the time scales associated with them. World culture is thus also warned against adhering to a temporal rhythm that is foreign to that of the Earth. This gives rise to a psychology of a “shifted” sense of time. According to the formula Pt=Tw-TK, the psychological instability of the experience of time is found to be the result of the tension arising from the difference between clock time and the time of nature (Meijer 1992). Scientifically speaking, clocks and calendars must align with the frequency of the passing sun and moon in order to be collectively and unambiguously attuned to the material reality and laws of that planet. Our grasp of reality and our mental health are determined by this. A different vibrational frequency thus corresponds to another planet or a parallel world in another galaxy with a neighboring frequency. Thus, there would be a whole range of parallel worlds to which one could be transported in phases (psychic, emotional, material) by manipulating electromagnetic fields or simply by maintaining the standard time frequencies of civil time conditioning. It could very well lure the aliens into creating "crop circles" here in our cornfields. The process of gaining energy until one teleports seems to proceed as follows: first, an energetic effect arises due to the deviation from the standard gravity of your location in the universe, then antigravity arises due to the loss of integron pressure, and subsequently, teleportation occurs via hyperspace to the neighboring frequency of another planet of a similar size as the entire integrity of vibration “jumps” or “slides” to a different vibrational number of curved space. In fact, this shifting is a phenomenon that has been observed in, among other things, NASA’s so-called “tether incident,” during which heavy UFO traffic was detected in the upper atmosphere using infrared technology.

  Searl and Sweet (xii) both reported that their generator - which consist of rotating magnets arranged in parallel (Searl) or rapidly vibrating magnets (Sweet), respectivel - first produced energy and then generated antigravity. Huchison, too, based on interfering electromagnetic frequencies in a test area, observes antigravity arising - just like Sweet (xii) - when the integron charge of his objects achieves independence by drawing in gravitons, thereby “charging” the matter with a different, non-material frequency. In this context, one should also recall the catastrophic consequences of the so-called Philadelphia Experiment (Project Rainbow) conducted by the U.S. Navy in 1943, undertaken as an alternative to the Manhattan Project to win the war. It is said that, with the secret cooperation of Tesla and Einstein, an attempt was made to render a warship named the U.S.S. Eldridge (photo 0) invisible by generating strong electromagnetic fields around the ship. It turned into a mess because the magnetic fields did not rotate, making it impossible to form a boundary for the field with the increased electromagnetic energy. They achieved dislocation (teleportation), disappearance, and reappearance, as well as the fusion of heterogeneous materials, as Huchison also observed: crew members fused with the ship’s metal, others went mad or spontaneously dissolved into thin air or burst into flames in the aftermath. They could not control the phenomenon and hushed up the project due to the disastrous consequences. That was then, but to this day, it appears they are still secretly working on it in a classified project called the Montauk Project, which, kept well under wraps, is a source of many conspiracy theories regarding UFO technology and mind-control devices as military weapons. It should be clear that experimenting with magnetic fields may provide a source of energy, but that it can also pose a danger if it undermines the electromagnetic foundation of our own physical existence, which is protected by the integron. By generating an artificial gravitational field, one distorts spacetime just as every celestial body does, as Einstein explained regarding the curved space of the integron. However, this distortion does not apply to linear time, which is maintained by the self-generated field that also preserves the elementary structure of the matter within it, consisting of protons, electrons, and neutrons. The mere vibration of magnetic fields can yield extra energy, but it can also result in a serious integrity crisis in the fusion of heterogeneous materials if the linear orde - the integrity of matte - is not maintained by the linear vibration. The paradox of the hyperspace jump consists in the fact that the cyclic action of magnetic fields creates the linear independence of the integron.

   Mechanical action of water (vapor) also attracts gravitons, as demonstrated by Kelvin’s water dropper, Baumann’s Testatika (viii), and the hydrosonic pump developed by Griggs and his predecessors. (x) As we have already seen in cold fusion and Kanarev’s processes, the atomic structure of (heavy) water lends itself very well to storing the added energy that, in the various forms of discharge, polarizes the graviton flow attracted by the movement of the water. In relation to an electrostatic voltage, they polarize into usable electrical energy in Bouwmann’s system. They can be converted into overunity heat, as in Griggs’s system, or induced into a dynamic electrical discharge, as in Kelvin’s system. The Testatika uses its sensors to capture the oppositely acting stream of polarizing gravitons via the electrostatic charge, which is generated mechanically, so that the machine becomes a self-runner with overunity. Kelvin realizes that difference between the start and end of the falling water’s trajectory, much like a lightning bolt does, and Griggs obtains his overunity heat through the explosion of the bubbles created by the cavities in the rotor.

   With their machines, inventors do not immediately overcome gravity or the generator’s location in the universal ether unless the magnetic fields rotate at super- or hyper-high speeds. First and foremost, energy is extracted from the vacuum through the dynamic interaction of gravitons with the moving magnets. Only the Searl effect exhibits antigravity through super-rotation. The two exception - formed by Sweet’s frequency influence with his generator and by Huchison in his antigravity experiment - are, because neither is based on rotation, less preferable according to the HDT. Without rotation, no integron is created for the object but is merely vibrated away; the generated graviton flux then displaces the integron, which can have disastrous effects on the integrity of the user’s electromagnetic matter. It could even constitute a disintegration weapon.

    To summarize what has been discussed so far regarding ether machines, energy is generated by converting natural graviton pressure: E + Egd = ouE. In other words: a base energy (E) capable of attracting gravitons yields overunity energy (ouE) upon conversion of the gravitons that naturally flow in due to the integron-graviton pressure of gravity (Egd). Put another way: the pressure of linear time (Egd) yields overunity energy (ouE) if, after startup, the basic energy maintained by the system manages to attract gravitons through a cyclic process. The appropriate method for attracting the gravitons is the rotation of magnetic fields, air, or liquids. Linear systems that are destructive to the integro - i.e., that do not build up and reintegrate the integron, or form their own gravitational fiel - cause problems when scaled up, even though they may be useful on a small scale for private use. The ether machines are graviton pumps that convert linear time into cyclic time. This cyclic time can generate electrical or mechanical energy, but in more advanced applications it can directly produce matter. Cloning or reproducing existing matte - as a kind of acceleration of the natural expansion of matter - is possible in the HDT. The natural local electrical behavior of Huchison’s crystals also falls under this definition. Due to the ordered structure of the crystals, the gravitons arrange themselves in such a way that, when the crystal is charged with an electrical impulse, they produce an ordered graviton uncertainty. The uncertain crystal then seeks to regain its former certainty via an electrical potential arising from its order. Depending on its structure, the crystal may be able to maintain that uncertainty for a long or short time, much like how one substance magnetizes better than another (x). Increasing the surface area by grinding the crystal yields more potential. This is what Huchison demonstrates in his Crystal Energy Cell demonstration. Radiant energy, such as that described by Tesla, Moray, and the rod effect (iv) is nothing other than the direct tapping, via metal plates or combinations of metals in a diode, of the potential difference between the linear ether of spacetime (the “neutrinos,” etc.) and the cyclic graviton flux of the cyclic ether or curved space - that is, the Earth’s magnetism. In the latter case, the Earth is the rotating magnet, and separate rotating mechanisms are unnecessary. The Earth, so to speak, already pumps all its own gravitons. Such machines are relatively the simplest in principle; they best approximate the definition of the ether machine as a valve, lock, or gate for space energy. We do get energy from that, but no spaceships. Long live spaceship Earth.

   What remains is to explain Reich’s orgone energy (iii). This is somewhat more complicated because antimatter - or the phenomenon of biological life - plays a role here. Reich observed a temperature difference of 0.3–1 degree Celsius at most between organic and inorganic matter, as well as an energetic, orgonal effect associated with long metal tubes interconnected at the base in a so-called cloudbuster. Despite Einstein’s objections, we give Reich the benefit of the doubt here, assuming that Einstein, in the absence of a theory of everything (our HDT), may have been constrained by the prevailing horizontal thinking to which his established status bound him. Reich called his energy orgonal because organic molecules attract the etheric energy more than inorganic molecules. In other words, according to Reich, the organic self functions as a graviton pump. Organic matter possesses a holistic integrity: while it is still alive, it has self-awareness and, consequently, free will - qualities that inorganic matter lacks. Organic matter can thus ascend vertically in consciousness through its own will to achieve union, whereas inorganic matter is incapable of such a thing. Organic matter thus has a spiritual counterpart; that is, spirit, intelligence, laterality, ego, feeling, and self-awareness according to the HDT. Inorganic matter does indeed have a graviton relationship - that is, electromagnetic properties and an associated force field - but is unaware of a spiritual counterpart. Inorganic matter is impersonal; being lifeless, it is unaware of a parallel organization in antimatter. Antimatter gives matter cohesion, integrity, self-control, and a motive for self-preservation. Matter exhibits diversification in a process we call evolution. Having evolved on the material plane, the next step consists of the return to singularity via the path of antimatter. In that evolution, gender, intelligence, and spirit arise, from which the rest of what the HDT describes follows in the levels above.

     In this way, living beings developed self-awareness and control. There is, as it were, a cycle of differentiating energy on the material plane that flows into unifying energy, which moves away from diversity or returns to the unity of the singular on the antimaterial or spiritual plane. Spiritual evolution takes over from material evolution. According to the HDT, Charles Darwin (1809–1882) is not wrong, but he merely describes the material diversification process of organisms, not their process of realization in which they seek and find their original unity in the past. We arise from a primordial substance, but we also return to it. These are evolutionary ideas that can be found in the views of pre-Socratic natural philosophers such as Democritus (460–370–80 BCE), in the work of the German Romantic philosopher and “transcendental idealist” Friedrich von Schelling (1775–1854), and in the writings of the French theologian and paleontologist Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881–1955). Through this intelligence of seeking symmetry with the material world without losing the diversity of matter - a phenomenon one might call the organic law - organisms establish their raison d’être by mastering matter, and evolution, which thus enters a new phase with the individual, achieves perfection. In that perfection, the living being forms an inner-outer boundary, a dipole of unity or timelessness that stands in contrast to diversity or temporality, a dipole that has existed at a fundamental level since the beginning of creation. Self-awareness is found in a process of realization; it is not conditioned from the outside as an addition to matter. There is, therefore, indeed an “intelligent design” of a manifesting spiritual antimatter structure according to the HDT. Such a design is also illustrated by the phenomenon of different humanoids on different planets, as confirmed by the Disclosure Group. What the British biologist Rupert Sheldrake calls morphic resonance is then seen as an indication of the presence of an intelligent cosmic “design,” a form that has evolved elsewhere and serves as a model for the ideal organic form: the humanoid form, a form toward which a turtle, a spider, a monkey, or any organic life form on another planet can evolve with the same evolutionary right (Ninja Turtles for real!). The Swiss best-selling author Von Däniken, with his thesis that the gods were cosmonauts who perhaps gave our species a less morphic form, may very well be right about this as well. Why shouldn’t the law of nature apply that states that the higher-evolved form is dominant over the lower species, extending even to the phenomenon of higher and lower humanoids? The human form may be superior, but that does not mean that Homo sapiens is the superior humanoid, the god of mankind (though that may well be the case, of course; after all, we don’t need a flying saucer to get to paradise, where we already are).

     The contrast between matter and antimatter was the first in creation. In the beginning, there was the singularity, in which everything was one. Then there was pure energy - the dark matter we call spacetime alowing with its consciousness as the first antimatter counterpart. Then linear time split in terms of direction, and universal space was created, whereby the ego detached itself from the bliss of self-awareness, from the bliss of the whole. Only then did the cyclical matter of manifestation emerge, like condensing water droplets, through the swirling of time energy that split in two because it could not find balance. Broken symmetry lies at the basis of creation, as established natural science posits today, as we have already seen. That matter combined into organisms that manifested the simultaneously developed diversity of spiritual, timeless antimatter. Only with the cyclical manifestation of matter do forces come into play that act upon that matter. Simply put, after the One came first dark energy, then the flow of time, and only then a material interplay of forces: energy, time, and force - that is, the pradhâna, akasha, and shakti of the three Vishnus, the primordial ether, the universal ether, and the local ether, as we have already discussed. Spiritually, parallel to this, there is self-awareness from the One itself, then the ego, and then the sexual opposition with a mind and an intelligence; self-awareness, ego, wisdom (compare: the natural dispositions in the Game of Order). Only in the evolution of the organism does the orgone energy manifest, which is the result of the innate tendency toward unification, the desire to return to the singular or to the God ever-present in the background, as one has come to call the integrity of the Perfect Whole. After all, spiritual union releases energy - the energy that was trapped within conditioning - just as happens physically when hydrogen and oxygen are burned to produce water.

          A schematic representation of Reich's orgone accumulator

As the Vedic classics state: vapor or air gives rise to fire, and fire gives rise to water. Similarly, the reversal of evolution in the devolution of antimatter generates heat that arises internally where the union takes place. The energy of evolutionary pressure must go somewhere and thus generates heat. Thus, organisms are warm in the biochemical union of their ethereal, organically bounded water, and their organic matter retains that heat capacity for a very long time even after life has already departed. Everyone knows that a wool sweater is “warmer” and “breathes better” than a synthetic sweater. But can we technically explain this sensation using the horizontal logic of non-hierarchical thinking according to the old scientific model? Now we must be honest and not arrogantly put forward the validity of horizontal thinking as proof of the invalidity of vertical HDT thinking. The heat effect, which is indeed present in the orgonal experimental setup shown in the figure above, can be explained by the antimaterial, hierarchical devolution that, in principle, generates heat within the union. How this can occur with wool and cotton from an organism that is already dead can be explained as a graviton charge with which the antimatter in the living being maintained equilibrium, and which, in principle, can disappear over time. Thus, fresh wool can produce a greater temperature difference than old wool. This must be investigated experimentally.

  There is such a thing as spontaneous human combustion, which shows that control over the organic/etheric heat process can be lost. We don’t know exactly how. Meditating monks are an example of successful organic heat control. Some monks in the Himalayas can meditate naked in freezing temperatures so that the snow around them melts. They generate pure heat because they can produce gravitons through their spiritual union. They do not become thinner than usual, but they do lose some of their ability to act. The life energy must go somewhere. Matter alone cannot achieve this because it is, after all, under the evolutionary pressure of the diversification process in which forces keep each other apart. In devolution, however, the soul commands an end to the diversification, which is then called karma or result-oriented activity. In this union, the heat is called spiritual happiness and love. That is what we experience when we celebrate Sundays: no more karma, but union without any fruit-bearing activities. Then there is the love and warmth of being together, which desires nothing else but that. The standard principles of thermodynamics in physics pertain to the horizontal processes of energy binding and dissociation. Vertical hierarchical evolution or devolution of energetic phenomena in matter fall outside that perspective. Vertically, materialization and dematerialization are normal occurrences. Such is the nature of evolution and its counterpart. We come from somewhere and return to somewhere else. In the vertical dimension, energy binds itself evolutionarily, step by step, into the diversity of matter, while in the antimatter union, that energy is released as a binding agent of love and happiness for the ego that must attain self-awareness. Thus, we arrive at a perfectly logical conclusion by positing the graviton - with its universal force field, or rather, its spacetime reality or spatial scope - as the material counterpart of the ego with its bliss of sexual union. It is important to remember in this context that space can be viewed as a form of matter and vice versa, just as time and matter can be seen as transformations of one another. Time, space, and matter define each other as the basic elements of visible reality: matter is time-energy that occupies a certain space.

    Some scientists refer to religion and meditation as a regressive process, but “regression” is not the right word. “Devolution” is the correct term. In English, it refers to the delegation of central government functions to regional authorities, but here we wish to use this term to describe a natural process of inner unification while preserving external diversity and structure. In a horizontal view, regression suggests the disintegration of the structure of matter toward a previous stage. But devolution merely reverses the course of evolution inward, without losing diversity: there is then vertical “decline” in the sense of not achieving further results. Energy is directed toward happiness and self-awareness, toward the stability of marriage and the harmony of the mind and intelligence. Rituals then serve to maintain contact with reality and to dissipate excess energy in order to prevent “self-ignition” or unwanted self-heating. Every culture of spiritual communion has rituals and sacrificial ceremonies. Those who think horizontally do not understand this and assume that someone somewhere is profiting from the religious charade. But most spiritual practices can be performed quite well on one’s own, without the attention of others. So that reasoning does not hold up. The essence of the energy issue as discussed here is that we receive energy and find harmony from the (relative) ether - whether through mechanical-experimental or organic means - in spiritual communion. We radically reject the notion that it is all a deception perpetrated by people who only cost you money and your energy - or even your intelligence or integrity - as a form of pathological suspicion or jealousy, a product of a distorted sense of time. Religions may be old hat and the religious books full of metaphors and allegories, but they still form an essential basis for the gain of ethereal energy upon which culture thrives. The energy issue is resolved from a psychological perspective when we clearly grasp the order of time as it exists in nature. By resolving the psychological issues associated with flawed conditioning, we naturally face the next practical step in our cultural evolution: replacing internal combustion engines with quantum mechanical vacuum or space-energy converters - or ether machines - that operate based on an experiment confirming the relative ether as an energy source. We must carry out that experiment so that all this theory and the accompanying speculations and hypotheses lead to replicable machines - in other words, so that it works - and is thus, at least in part, valid in its fundamentals. Until then, we will have to make do with solar energy as the form of renewable energy that comes closest to the direct extraction (or conversion) of relative space energy.

    So if we want to understand what Reich was doing, we must consider the vertical line of thought. He clearly saw a connection between orgone energy and sexuality. He hypothesized that exposing a person to orgone energy in one of his accumulators would cure the person of impotence and similar conditions. Sexual union, practiced in a tantric manner - that is, meditatively, non-violently, and not focused on a result - constitutes one of the two gateways in HDT - the so-called Dionysian or hedonistic path - that makes spiritual union possible. The other path is that of spiritual union through the intellect: the Apollonian path. In this context, one also speaks of left-handed and right-handed tantra yoga. And these two choices are available to beginners. As soon as the ego arises, it is over, according to the HDT. If you meditate on sex, the intellect unites with the spirit to form the ego. Equally, you may also notice that with intellectual work not focused on results, a celibate path can be taken: sex can become a disruptive factor because it distracts too much from the “higher.” The ego, or sense of self, that arises from spiritual union stands in contrast to the happiness sought in sexual union. According to the HDT, it is an inevitable side effect resulting from the duality of the whole. So unless, in the next stage, one merges the ego with happiness without further involving sex, no stable self-awareness can arise that enables the control over matter necessary for humans to exercise their free will non-destructively and thus continue to exist peacefully in harmony with nature and with one another. After sexual meditation comes ego meditation; after sexual happiness comes ego happiness. Ego happiness is self-awareness; it is the individual soul. The material parallel to this is that the energy gain and heat gain from the material union on an organic basis involves the conversion of gravitons - or orgone, undirected energy - on a material basis. While such an energy gain may contradict the principles of thermodynamics, it does not contradict the HDT. Orgone energy gain is nothing more than the reversal of the force of evolution, a reversal in which gravitons are recovered by giving up diversification or the karmic pursuit of results. Benefit: materially, there is thermal energy and vital harmonization, and spiritually, there is an increase in synergy because there is more love and happiness, and the ego can attain self-awareness. This aligns with Reich’s claims that his accumulator would cure people of colds, cancer, and sexual ailments.

   In summary, orgone energy production begins with the tantra - or the intellectual aspect - of transcending the mind and the sexual, and then, at higher levels within the individual soul, involves the unification of the ego in bliss. Finally, the individual soul must also seek its eternity in the more enduring and permanent liberation within the singular self of the universe: the Super-soul of what the person originally is as a union of all matter, space, and time. From a spiritual perspective, the HDT is in accordance with the teachings of the science of tantra and yoga: first, one is pas’u-tantric, purely sexual, to give the mind an “I”; then, one is vira-tantric, more engaged in yoga to give happiness a soul; and finally, one is divya-tantric, with pure devotion, more like a monk and predominantly celibate, engaged in bringing self-awareness to God-consciousness. And thus the timeless devolution is complete without any regression occurring on the material plane.

   With this final direct energy generator from Reich, we can conclude that the engineer is a self-aware human being who has not excluded himself from the machine. What we can learn from Reich is that human beings themselves are the most important generators of free energy - the free energy we need to find greater synergy with one another and thus be able to solve common problems. In Reich, we see organism and mechanism merging, and in this way he provides a fitting conclusion to the energy question. It may take another thirty or forty years before we can buy free-energy machines in stores. Developing technology for the consumer simply takes a lot of time and effort. We’ll leave his so-called cloudbuster for controlling the climate aside for now as a karmic eccentricity of his. Dispersing clouds doesn’t seem directly relevant to the topic of the energy issue, even though there is a connection to the climate problem. The plan is more about allowing the climate to recover by disturbing it less.

   In conclusion, we can say that the hero of our story is the graviton particle: the invisible, massless particle of cyclic time-energy with its diffuse charge and spin. According to formal physics, within the framework of quantum field theory, the graviton is a hypothetical elementary particle that mediates gravity, and it does so via what we have called the integron, or the linear effect of space pressure. Since the particle is not yet known, scientists hope to detect it in particle accelerators. String theory, in fact, predicts the existence of gravitons as well as their clearly defined interactions. However, HDT asserts that manipulation of the graviton is not possible without converting it into another particle, just as the speed of light cannot serve as a material quantity to prove - or disprove - the ether as a non-material, but protomaterial phenomenon.  You’re comparing apples to oranges, and that doesn’t work in the HDT; in the HDT, you have to calculate differently at a different level of the hierarchy of manifestation. It is the effects we’ve discussed here that constitute the experimental evidence for the graviton. The rotation or vibration of magnetic fields generates energy, affects gravity, and can warp spacetime. But a bottle of gravitons remains just a bottle containing a vacuum. We found a nice description of the graviton on YouTube. A young American woman with no knowledge of physics had a dream and talks about it in a video titled: Random Thoughts - What is a Graviton?. She saw a particle shaped like a bead, with a tree projected inside it like a strand of DNA. She then wondered: “God, are you telling me that the nature of the universe is contained in a graviton particle?” The HDT agrees with her; the entire universe is found within the space formed by the graviton.

  The energy issue - including its innovations and the HDT statement acknowledging the reality of orgone quality, as we have seen - is also a matter of how we handle our personal energy: are we focused upward on selfless, spiritual love and inner union with the personal and societal benefits thereof, or are we filled with rivalry, focused on having biological or spiritual children who must ensure the material continuity of our civilization? The answer is that Jacob’s ladder can be used both upward and downward. It is as we saw in *The Ether Exists!* (Aadhar 2006), we saw it more as a so-called Escher staircase: climbing up is simultaneously descending. That is evolution and refinement in harmony. And that is what it is all about. For our progress as humanity as a whole, the vertical HDT concept of the relative ether is, in any case, of essential importance if we wish to address the issue of direct energy harvesting and climate control. To explain why electrical or mechanical energy is produced through direct transformation, we will have to explore this line of thought. For if we do not know the source of the energy, but are able to generate energy using an invention such as the ether machines described above, a curious problem arises: we have hands that, through invention, prove to be more intelligent than our brains can keep up with - hands that are smarter than brains. The child is already here but cannot yet think.  As Bearden also confirms, we are still very much in the early stages of ether technology. In this context, discussing a possible conspiracy by established financial powers to suppress free energy - powers that are allegedly repressive - s less important than understanding the psychology of the paradigm conflict within a single individual. Once that psychology - which, as we have seen, is linked to the order of time - is understood, we achieve the integration of the cultural person, and suspicion loses its power, no matter how real the threats were that are symptomatic of the ignorance surrounding an evolutionarily inevitable renewal.