Pamphlet for a New
Energy Policy
3) The
paradigmatic conflict
The
paradigmatic conflict between the
direct winning of energy at the one
hand and the existing transformation
of raw materials in association with
the secondary sustainable technologies
at the other hand has a long
history. The conflict resulted
in the destruction and repression of
the work of early pioneers in this
field like Nikola
Tesla
(1846-1943), the inventor of the
alternating current, and Wilhelm
Reich
(1897-1957), who made several
discoveries in this line of research
(see also the article on Einstein,
the ether and relativism at this site). After
the death of Tesla were his papers
confiscated by the american government
and kept secret because one didn't
want his inventions in
the field of weapons technology to end up in the  wrong
hands. And with that action were also
many of his inventions meant for the
civil society and inventions which
could be important for the development
of free energy technology relegated to
the darkness of ignorance. Already
during his lifetime had not only Tesla
great difficulty to keep the status of
and financial support for his work
with the increasing eccentricity of
his inventions, but had also Reich
troubles with his invention of orgone
energy - the name he gave to free
energy - about which he had consulted
Einstein. Einstein had rejected him
with the message that there were
alternative explanations to be found,
but without him willing to continue
with the investigations. Nevertheless
had Reich irrevocably proven, against
the second law of thermodynamics, that
organic material by nature has a
slightly higher temperature than
inorganic material. With that
difference one then had the proof of
his orgone energy. Also people like Viktor Schauberger (see video) (1885-1958), and John E.W. Keely (1827-1898) were not
taken seriously because of their
energetic interpretations of the force
of the ether, of which we now
understand that it had to be the
dynamical force of the relative ether
the way Einstein stated it later in
his career. Since Einstein had a shift
of paradigm taken place away from
Newton and Maxwell in which scientists
no longer could accept such superseded
ideas of the ether as a uniform
substance as being the correct
presentation of the state of affairs
in nature. The concept of ether turned
out to be a bit more complicated thus.
The concept of the ether should not
have been abandoned though but had to
be reassessed, and that is what
Einstein finally in 1920 did in public
in a lecture in Leyden, The
Netherlands, where he clearly spoke in
defense of a concept of ether which is
based upon the physical properties
that unmistakably are attached to the
reality of space. Matter, time and
space can factually not be considered
as separate things. They define each
other. This change of mind of Einstein
meant an enormous shock for the
science of physics and lead to a great
divide among its members, a divide
which the science has never managed to
overcome (see
also Kostro 2000). Nevertheless is at
present of all the ether
theories (aether theories)
the so-called Ae-theory
of Einstein the one most popular
among physicists. In this  theory is one since
the eighties of the twentieth century
playing with the notion of a universal
concept of time and a fixed frame of
reference in space which is at odds
with the so-called Lorentz
invariance; it amounts to the
fact that one is meddling with the
dogma of the in all directions
invariant speed of light which
constitutes the basis for the theory
of relativity. In fact
converted Einstein with the revision
of his ether notion and turned he back
to the classical theories of the
universe that assign the ether an
all-important place in creation, be it
that he now considered also the ether
as relative, as a form of space
depending upon material
characteristics.
Of course can only be
spoken of progress when the new way
of thinking of modern physics
encompasses the old way, and not so
much when one tries to reinvent the
wheel of the classics with a lot of
ego. A 'theory of everything'
contains of course also the truth of
the past. Nikola Tesla in the New
York Times of 11 July 1935 said
about Einstein's descriptions: "magnificent
mathematical garb which
fascinates, dazzles and makes
people blind to the underlying
errors. The theory is like a
beggar clothed in purple whom
ignorant people take for a
king..., its exponents are
brilliant men but they are
metaphysicists rather than
scientists.." (see wikipedia article). Einstein is not as
concrete and clear as an ingenious
and original inventor and engineer
specialized in practicable thinking
als Tesla would like. One doesn't
all of a sudden have a 'new theory
of everything', an integer paradigm.
And Einstein's notion of a relative
ether was also not something new
either. His 'new ether' can be
retraced to the vedic culture of
India which we, especially from the
Hare Krishna's, learned to know
since the sixties of the twentieth
century. Therein is the ether
divided in three, in other words:
considered relative. Vedically one
speaks of
three Vishnus who each represent
another part of the ether (cosmic, universal en
local). Also  the esoteric
philosopher Rudolf Steiner
(1861-1925), a contemporary of
Einstein, spoke of a relative ether:
the expanding warmth ether and the
light ether as opposed to the
contracting chemical or sound ether
and the life ether (with to the left
pictured the respective symbols).
History teaches us that
repressive progress, progress in
which previous developments are
entirely denied, repressed and
forgotten, leads to a serious
obstruction or else collapse of the
civilization in question. The roman
empire e.g. has, as a culture, as a
time system directed to the order of
the moon, in about two steps
abolished itself: first was by
Julius Caesar 45 B.C. the lunar
calendar abolished and replaced by a
solar calendar, and next was the
order of the week that was projected
upon the solar calendar, but still
knew its traditional lunar division,
for practical reasons (the market)
for the civil population abolished
by Constantine the Great in 321 A.D.
The correspondence with the moon (in
so-called Ides, Nones and Kalends)
was at the time definitely replaced
by the linear, not leaped order of
the week that was introduced by him
(for the monasterial rule was it by
the Christians maintained till the
end of the Middle Ages). Little more
than a hundred years after
Constantine introduced the linear
week, stormed the barbarians the
administratively and culturally
completely eroded city of Rome to be
plundered by a so-called 'primitive'
barbarian culture directed to...
indeed the lunar calendar! Also
Islam managed in the seventh century
A.D. with its prayer times to the
sun to put a foot in the european
cultural doorway of linear weeks and
is up to the present day in conflict
with it (as well with itself as with
the West). Repressive progress at
the cost of that what historically
preceded is thus no real progress at
all but a compensatory phenomenon.
There is renewal, but the synergy
does not improve: it crumbles only
further away. With the ego of the
renewal is easily the continuity
with the past broken, with the old
regime, and thus is one losing one's
integration and falls the culture
down. A common culture (or order of
time) can factually, if one wishes
to keep it in a working order, only
be expanded upon, one e.g. adds such
a complication as a solar calendar
or linear week to it, but the
inheritance of the thereto belonging
culture of the lunar calendar
preceding can't just like that be
erased from the collective memory or
the (genetically programmed)
consciousness of the natural
reality. If one nevertheless tries
to do that, is one in that case
grossly underestimating the power of
time conditionings. Within a culture
is a certain continuity needed when
one doesn't want to speak of a fall
down of that culture. Old mistakes
and imperfections must thus be
understood and remembered the way
one also commemorates wars, and
cannot be repressed just like that
just to get rid of the old misery.
The free energy researcher Peter Lindeman
states relating to this: "In this
society, theoretical science has
been elevated to a very high level
of prestige. Under this system of
belief, the real needs of humanity
have not been well served. It is
time that these incorrect theories
be carefully examined and
discarded, so that experimental
science can once again take the
leading role in defining the
nature of physical reality. Only
then will Etheric Science be free
to offer its bounty of solutions
to a desperate and waiting world."
History will repeat itself if we
haven't learned from it, if we don't
remember what went wrong. The later
Julian calendar e.g. needed a
correction in the method of leaping
in order to accord with the
classical play of forces of the
ether, but the calendar shouldn't in
its entirety have been abolished,
the way the pope it at the end of
the Middle Ages did for the
monasteries. To be aware of
repression is something we learned
later on from the behavioral
science, or art, of psychoanalysis.
The unconscious is an enemy
facilitating a sudden change of
culture or a break of paradigm, a
change which because of that same
enemy of not being conscious is also
dangerous: on the personal level we
e.g. may remember it from the
popular song with the text 'suddenly
he was not the man he used to be'
the way the Beatles sang it in
'Yesterday'. Just as a breakdown can
change an individual human being
completely overnight, is also a war
on a collective scale capable of
changing people no-time into zombies
who no longer understand matters,
who are out of touch with their past
and change into animals. The
psychiatrist calls it decompensation
of the ego: the performance of
control can no longer be kept up.
The
present established, 'classical',
indirect method of winning energy
based on coal, oil and gas, which felt
threatened by the energy innovators
and inventors, has till the end of the
twentieth century, till very recently
thus, been very repressive and
destructive. That has not only
resulted in many a personal and
scientific drama, but has also
contributed to an obstruction of the
progress that mankind needs in order
to survive on this planet, we now
begin to realize. On e.g. the webpage
PESwiki-suppression and in the Lightworks
documentary Tesla
and the race to Zero point energy are many cases
discussed. One of the best known is
the suppression of Tesla by his
financier J.P. Morgan who cancelled
e.g. his entire Wardenclyffe
project
of free energy for the entire planet
because it couldn't generate any
income. The repression of this kind of
inventions as well as the traumatized
paranoia about the free
energy suppression1 associated with it,
can no longer be maintained, even
though the danger of some inventions
indeed mustn't be underestimated and
may justify a certain secrecy. For
this kind of secrecy developed Tesla
himself e.g. a complex procedure about
the proliferation of a weapons system
of his in which he diminished the risk
of possible abuse as much as he could
by dividing the knowledge in question
over several governments of the
countries in the world: it would only
work if they would cooperate. The
threat of a total collapse of the
culture and the thereto belonging
world peace, the danger of
decompensation as the psychiatrist
calls it, with the repression of the
inventions in the field of the direct
winning of energy, is just as well a
clear and present danger. A stressed
culture may give an odd response. For
a long time one may compensate for a
lack of knowledge and skills, with
nice movies on television e.g., but
these compensations are but a
surrogate of course, in the end there
is only the possibility of a new
culture when the essential knowledge
thereof is shared and handed down in
the educational system. Keeping people
ignorant one creates a sub-class with
the size of the base of a pyramid
relating to the top, and thus having
created has one that way arrived at an
inequality of citizens which sooner or
later, violent or not, will result in
a reaction like it concerned something
determined by a law of nature. The way
gaseous molecules mix into a
homogenous mass, can also the equality
among people in the field of knowledge
not be stopped. Thus must we take care
not to throw away the child of the
continuity, the soul of the culture,
away with the bathing water of renewal
and innovation. And it indeed seems to
be so that we collectively will have
to change our energy policy, whether
we like it or not. For the resources
used in non-sustainable energy are
getting depleted and the limits of
what our environment can bear are
reached. The indirect, renewable form
of winning energy keeps demanding for
a greater efficiency, which refers to
a more direct method of winning
sustainable energy. We simply have to
thus, however attached we are to the
old order of the secondary policy of
winning energy. For the same reason of
in the future having to be vegetarians
because the production of meat is
simply a very inefficient way of
producing proteins which cannot be
maintained with increasing numbers of
people on the planet, must we also let
go of the old policy of winning energy
and the thereto belonging economical
and geopolitical strategies. We
therefore have to expand our view with
the extra concept of a primary way of
winning energy and thus correct our
relativistic paradigm with the
'absolute relativity' of the order of
the primary energy in the universe.
The repression may not become a
decompensation but must, politically
correct, more or less therapeutically,
in a psychologically responsible
manner be guided towards a revaluation
of the by many a 'modern' scientist so
very much despised concept of ether.
And in that case play as well the new
inventions a part as the notion of a
second 'converted' Einstein who later
on in 1920 said that he had been too
'radical' in his rejection of the
ether as being a superfluous and
out-dated concept1.
We are simply driven by
the force of evolution to which we
all, as energetic, ethereal, living
beings are subjected. We are dealing
with a compelling force of nature that
is mightier than the individual
decision of single persons, national
governments or supranational,
financial interest groups. And that
evolution followed probably quite a
different course from what we always
have thought it would have with
Charles Darwin. Modern skulls have
been found in layers of petrified
sediment of millions years old and
next to traces of dinosaurs have been
found just as old fossilized foot
prints of modern man2. The ruling paradigm
always represses the anomaly - or the
invention of an alternative technology
of winning energy in our case - and
the new paradigm will have to
integrate that knowledge. The new
energy suppression is thus not so much
a matter of evil minded persons,
institutions or administrations, but
is more an intellectual problem of a
paradigmatic revolution. One has to
grasp it, drop out and then switch
over to it. Only if a majority does
this has the new paradigm arrived.
Till that time is everything of it
joyously ridiculed. It is the way the
philosopher Schopenhauer
(1788-1860)
said it and after him also the
psychoanalyst S. Freud and the
SF-author Arthur C. Clarke: firstly
one is ridiculed, then one is opposed
and next is one accepted as if it
concerned the most common thing in the
world (see the quotation at the
beginning). It is a known mechanism of
which many writers and artists can
testify. To be acknowledged, takes
some time, and that is thus also true
for a new technology. Nature commands
us how to behave, viz. to be adapted
to time and circumstance, and the same
way command our genes us as well as
the culture does we have developed
with it. To evolve, also culturally
thus, is more an established fact, a
cosmic necessity, a need which in all
her effects of refinement and
improvement of adaptations must be
retracable in all the worlds of
living, and thus also on other planets
if we could visit them. The often from
the side of the government classified
investigations about UFO's,
extraterrestrial life, that is to say
extraterrestrial human, humanoid life
and human civilizations, point always
in that direction. Among scientists
there is no doubt that
extraterrestrial life with a high
degree of civilization exists (see
e.g. the Drake-equation). The problem is more
in delivering the proof, or better
stated, in the repression of the proof
we have. More and more is there in the
past couple of years (2005-2007) from
the side of the (american) government,
from military organizations and the
scientific community an increasing
openness. The proof that such an
intelligent, highly evolved culture is
observing us, was in the past kept
away from the public, if necessary
with disinformation, intimidation or
worse measures, in order not to
disturb the common man and to prevent
that one as a government would be
faced with
unwanted civil initiatives and collective
psychological problems. One doesn't
want to be embarrassed with the then
inevitably rising demands for control
and action one administratively and
scientifically cannot immediately
answer to. It is for everyone an
uncharted territory. But it is also
true that we in the context of our
subject mustn't just look away from
extraterrestrial phenomena. In that
context are we namely faced with an
alternative and undoubtedly much more
civilized, energy policy and a better
form of self control of not just the
individual, but also of a better
science and culture of living together
in relation to gravity and moving
through time and space. In that sense
can the energy question not be
regarded separately from our concepts
of space, the order of time, the
forces of nature, elementary particles
and the existence of more dimensions
than the three or four we acknowledge
at the moment. Let us therefore first
delve deeper into that what we have
witnessed to be true for our
extraterrestrial visitors, for we are
more conscious then of where we are
standing ourselves and what remains to
be done by us.
We learn through
observation, after first, very
socratically, having accepted our
ignorance, and mustn't assume that we
will learn anything if we turn away
from matters like these. It takes
courage, but it is also very
scientific, not to jump to conclusions
immediately but simply admit that
there might be something we do not
know. How else may one discover
anything? About extraterrestrials and
the energy politics associated with
them has been produced a nice
documentary called: UFO:
The Greatest Story Ever Denied by Joe
Escamilla. Therein he answers the
question how and why the american
government, or in fact a shadow
government of national and
international institutes, have kept
UFO's and their free energy technology
a secret for the wider public. There
is mention of a group of people, of
whistle-blowers from within the
governmental institutions in America,
who stepped up to act against the
secrecy: the UFO
Disclosure Group (see also disclosure.net and some
dutch pages). In May 2001 they
gave a press
conference and posted they on
Google video's with testimonial
accounts (zie Video's 1 &2). The present chairman
is named dr.
Steven Greer. He has a site named AERO. Another well-known
protagonist is Stephen Basset of the exopolitics
Paradigm
Research Group. These people state
that humanity is suffering too much
damage from the for political and
economical reasons, in combination
with billions of dollars consuming
so-called z.g. black projects (see
the video Billion
Dollar Secret), keeping secret among
other things the knowledge already
available of energy systems of an
alien origin. With this knowledge are
there, based on reverse engineering
of crashed UFO's and contacts with
aliens themselves, already by human
beings manufactured ETV's, or extraterrestrial
vehicles, like the TR-3B secret
USAF craft. Also have free energy
technologies been classified. One may
be referred to the words of the hacker
Gary Mackinnon (site, wiki, pagina, blog, interview), the Google video
presentation: The
Case for Antigravity, an interview with the
Area
51 specialist Edgar Fouché, the testimonies of physicist
Bob Lazar (video
1&2), the ex-Majestic
12
collaborator the microbiologist Dan
Burisch (video, interviews; page's, site, info) and a lecture of Stan
Deyo
(site, book). But the truth can
despite of all the secrecy not be
stopped in this inevitable cultural
evolution towards a greater planetary,
humanoid awareness. Countless patens
have been awarded the last hundred
years concerning UFO-technological
inventions. The researcher Luke
Fortune bundled since 1997 in
five thick volumes 3200 pages of
descriptions of 260 patents of
replicable  designs
(see e.g. the U.S. patents 3774865 en 10074934). There are also
designs from the Nazi-germany era in
which one tried to use this technology
to obtain military superiority. The
Germans, who forced free energy
inventors like Victor Schauberger to work for them,
called their prototypes 'rundflugzeuge',
or 'roundcrafts'. Their term for space
energy was 'vril-energie' and
they called their prototypes Vrils
(ranking up to number 8 see right
picture) and Haunebu's (up to type
III). Vril was a term in 1870 coined
by Sir Edward
Bulwer-Lytton in a book called Vril,
The Power of the Coming race (pdf), an early
science-fiction book of the victorian
writer who also wrote The last Days of
Pompei. The roundcrafts were
pretty crude iron discs with a dome
with windows, and the prototypes
actually worked! (German site, pictures, s). In the next chapter
we will see how the Nazi's who
resented the 'american-jewish' science
came up with a free energy device as
well. Fortune states that the absence
of applications of these inventions is
mainly caused by the fact that the
usual means of propulsion and the
thereto belonging conventional ways of
winning energy are more profitable.
The initial impetus for the new
paradigm is undoubtedly present in
countless practically applicable
forms, but the culture for it is
simply not achieved yet. The internet
is part of this paradigmatic
development and runs in many respects
far ahead of the other media, mainly
because everyone may contribute,
whether serious or not, and because of
the fact that a documentary on the
internet sinks in properly while on TV
it by accident has to be recorded to
serve as study material. More and more
networks post their essential
materials on the internet as we can
see e.g. on their
sites.
On Google and on YouTube one can study
countless professional and amateur
movies of often vague, but sometimes
also very convincing proofs of the
UFO-presence and the matter of free
energy. To begin with we would like to
refer to four sensational YouTube
movies from the UFO realm that raise
doubts by many because they appear so
real. In the next section will we
further expound on the energy
question. Of the following evidence
has not been proven that is was faked.
 1) A UFO seen very
nearby during a TV documentary in
Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina 10
August 2005. Behind the journalist
giving his report suddenly people look
up to see there together with him a
UFO of a couple of meters wide, as it
slowly glides away behind a building.
(also here)
2) A UFO very ceary
visible with navigation controls
above a small river in italy. A clearly visible
disc of three to four meters floats
above a small river showing some
technology of moving parts, after
which it suddenly flashes away as fast
as a bullit (see also a computer
generated version of a similar group
of UFO's pictured in Mexico 2007).
3) A challenging UFO
viewed from a helicopter close to
the former WTC-buidings - see also version2. A UFO of again a
couple of meters wide shoots away from
behind a WTC building and leaves
behind, something which is very
uncommon, a condensation trail. About
a kilometer away it stops mid-air and
then races for the helicopter from
which everything is recorded. Just
before it would hit the chopper the
craft makes a sharp turn right in
front of it to race away with
lightning speed.
4) A
UFO-wreck thousands of years old
found on the moon during the Apollo
20 mission (video
2 -
see also another
discussion of other UFOs seen by
NASA).
Formally the Apollo 20 mission is said
to have been cancelled in 1970 for
budgetary reasons, and thus never
would have taken place. In what thus
would be an elaborated and
sophisticated fake is seen how slowly,
with a scan of the lunar
surface, a peculiar vehicle
appears in
sight of the camera with a technical
protusion like a cockpit on top and
alien signs on the hull, as also
meteor impacts on top of it. Comments:
'this vehice is in a bad condition,
it must be here for billions of
years'. One says that the
recordings constitute a cover-up
to conceil the real images of
NASA. There exists also a second
version of the sighting of the
vehicle which is shown below.
Concerning the
direct encounters with these
extraterrestrial civiliations is there
of the investgating journalist, the
renown UFO-expert Jaime
Moussan, a good
video of a conference in Mexico to
the occasion of incidents there, in which photographic
materials of aliens, together with
their messages in the form of the well
known patterns in the fields, the
so-called crop circles was discussed
(see also our other article
about this). Sgt. Clifford Stone
(US Army) of the UFO Disclosure Group
mentions 57
different species of aliens, of which some can
be found onYouTube with photographs that
escaped the control of governmental
agencies (see also alienvideo.net). Next to that is
there a documentary about UFOs in
Russia called UFO
KGB Secrets, presented by
Roger Moore, which delivers very
convincing proofs of the existence of
UFO's and the secrecy by the russian
government of (sometimes violent)
confrontations with the interplanetary
visitors, including an autopsy on
alien bodily remains and photo
materials of
an in the region of Sverdlovsky in
1968 crashed UFO (thus independent of
the Roswell-crash4). Also was there,
believe it or not, beginning of 2007 a
report of an interview with an alien
3 to be seen on Youtube
which, as a top-secret of the
government, because the copyrights
would have been violated, was removed
from the internet. Later on was it
posted again though. The picture at
the left is from that intervieuw. The
existence of the being named J-rod
(EBE-2) is confirmed by Dan Burisch,
who did extensive biochemical research
on it (see
his declarations). There is thus no
lack of evidence from even the most
reliable sources. Within the UFO
Disclosure Group there are witnesses
from the NSA, FBI, CIA and all
departments of the armed forces of
America, who are often of the highest
security levels within these world's
most powerful and mighty societal
institutions. One of the arguments
they put forward is: ' absense of
evidence is no evidence of absense',
we musn't think that these phenomena
are fabrications of hysterical people
when secret services are keeping
matters like these confidential. These
people are willing to testify even
under oath before congress of
the irrefutable reality of this for
mankind such an all-imporrant matter
reaching far beyond what the public as
yet has been allowed know.
The
spaceship on the moon that allegedly
was photographed by the Apollo 20
mission that formally never took
place.
The as a consequence of
conscious and unconscious processes
blocking of the knowledge of such a
humanoid reality of civilization and
evolution, upon the reality of which
we collectively ought to employ
scientific reverse
engineering and be of disclosure
if we with a new cultural integration
want to succeed in thinking along with
it, can also be understood as being
the result of a diseased mistrust held
against mankind by a mankind which
doesn't keep itself for incapable but
for unworthy and inferior. We already
for centuries have knowledge of
UFO's and have an inferiority
complex and a psychology of repression
about it (see also ufoevidence.org and crystallinks). Faced with our
shortcomings and inferiority in a
certain area of interest - and why
would that be true for spiritual
matters by the way - do we tend to
backwardness, false pride and
self-destruction. Especially
governments have a hard time
psychologically to admit to anything
of succeeding or failing in matters of
this concern. With experts like Stanton T. Friedman (nuclear physicist,see
info-page) who regularly testify
of the authenticity of the sightings,
is in the documentary of the secrets
of the KGB on these matters the
following comment presented by mouth
of the russian ufologist Tiurin
Avinsky: 'we are simply not capable to
cope with the knowledge and technology
of such a fundamentally different
paradigm nor able to copy any of these
designs' (to the right a picture of
the disc that was salvaged by the
military in Sverdlovsky). One could just as well
show a computer to someone from the
roman empire. The extraterrestrials
think in terms of traveling through
dimensions, we in terms of traveling
trough a three-dimensionally fixed
reality.  There exists, so it
appears from the disclosures of the
Disclosure Group, thus a tension
between the knowledge kept secret and
that what we publicly know at the
moment. Witnesses
testify of fully operational flying
saucers of more than thirty meters
wide that by us were copied. This constitutes a
cultural conflict which cannot be
maintained any longer if we want to
find closure on the energy question.
The paradigmatic
conflict expresses itself time and
again in the form of disbelief and
even in the form of destructive
reponses like declarations of insanity
and accusations of fraud. One is
referred to all the reactions of
common folk on all the peculiar movies
on YouTube. Many, with among them
military people, air traffic
controllers, pilots and normal
citizens, lost their jobs because of
spilling the beans about this matter
and some even lost their lives with
it. One must consider these victims of
the repression to be heroes of our
evolution. In this repression can
collectively be recognized a
psychiatric pattern of a schizoid and
paranoid bordeline, politicized
sociopathic ego; a conflict of a
false, profit-minded control from the
side of individual, fearful civilians
and multinational corporations at the
other hand who have themselves
represented by governments that,
outside of the democratic control want
to pull the strings (in a
military/industrial sense) with
security levels ranking even higher
than the one of the american
president. The so-called. free energy
supression conspiracy theories
parallel to this are not just some
unjustified suspicions based on
individual failures that are held
against governmental institutions and
companies. It is a long standing
festering historical phenomenon in
which we at all cost want to defend
and maintain our honor and control. It
concerns a struggle in which mankind
gives evidence of symptoms of what
factually are evolutionary pains,
growth pains in which not only
individuals come to a fall and have to
start all over with a new life, but
with which in the past as known
complete cultures fell down and rose
again. It can be compared to an
inverted mourning process in which step by step
the new reality has to be accepted and
the old way of thinking and
repressively acting has to be given
up. UFOs are vehicles originating from
spaceborne civilizations that
abandon their planet in a search for
new worlds. There they willing or
unwillingly inspire for a continuation
of humanity and the development of a
culture and offer they thus a
completly different picture of
evolution from the one we have
cherished till now. They constitute a
cosmic paradox: man abandons a planet
to promote and sustain the life of man
on the planet; and thus it will also
be when we ourselves are etherborne.
Their civilization flourished together
with their planet. A flower blooms and
whithers away. Thus it also fares with
planets. But itself having sprouted
from seed produces the flower more new
seeds. Our human culture and the
biological equilibrium here on earth
is a flower and the ethermachine, the
vimana as it in ancient vedic
terms is called here on earth,
constitutes, including the winning of
energy from the vacuum belonging to
it, the seed which leads to the flower
meanwhile originating from it as well.
Some propose that as a theory about
our origins, one may differ in opinion
on this, but as an actual practice of
a cultural lead can the phenomenon
simply no longer be ignored (see for
instance the video's The
Cosmic Plan and the
stories of
Jim Sparks (en
2
and article), Riley
Martin (site) and others like Jaime Moussan who e.g. predict a
major turning point around the year
2012).
Many UFO 's above
Nürnberg, Germany 14 april 1561.
Hans Glaser
woodcut from 1566, 5 years after it
happened.
The evolution of our
science cannot exist apart from the
evolution of a culture belonging to it
and that communication process will
thus have to unfold itself. An
individual nutcase has a secret
science nobody understands: he doesn't
communicate, cannot account for his
actions and submerges with it in a
world of schizophrenic delusions of
selfdestruction, of a complete
bewilderment in which all sense of
reality is lost. As good as an
individual person can fall ill when he
consequently in his evolution is
hindered on purpose - but not realy
aware of the dangers - with fabricated
and entertained illusions, is it also
possible that a culture runs into a
diseased state. Exactly with keeping
the masses ignorant make the masses it
for themselves impossible to defend
themselves - or compete with - foreign
and also with alien cultures. That is
why we have produced this in writing:
that we may arrive at the
understanding that we also must be
alowed to develop a defense, that we
may find a way of our own with the
free energy and the anti-gravitation
of a better means of transport than
the polluting car (see e.g. the
inventors Hutchison and Searl and a powerpoint
presentation about anti-gravity and the documentary Who
killed the electric car?). That the aliens do
understand us is proven by a message
which was found in a series of
cropcircles near Chilbolton, Engeland
that have appeared since 2000 in
consecutive years. After first in 2001
having projected a human
face in a digital point format was there a message
which constituted an answer to the
so-called Arecibo
message that we earthlings
have sent into space ourselves in 1974
(see
also video). The aliens answered
with a similar pattern and from that
pattern followed that they e.g. have a
DNA structure based upon Silicium next
to the carbonchemistry of which we are
built. Furthermore indicated they also
what their sending and receiving
equipment looked like - see the
graphic at the beginning of this page
- and appeared later on in 2002 in
Winchester, Hapshire the face of an
alien in the crops that contained a
disc with a binary code in ASCII. The
authenticity of the crop pattern
seemed to be doubtful according the
researcher Freddy
Silva,
but the source
of the doubt was partly retracable
to Team Satan, a
disinformation-organization of the
british secret service MI6, who
possibly are the successors of the
infamous Doug and Dave, two elderly
Englismen who stated that they
themselves had produced many of the
crop-circles; an untenable claim. Team
Satan is commercial, but to produce as
good a pattern as shown here they
cannot. The pattern of the disc was
analyzed by the englishman Paul
Vigay and was next by the
south-american researcher Jaime
Moussan discussed in his
lecture. The message would,
somewhat enigmatically, state the
following:
"Beware
of the bearers
of false gifts and
the broken promises.
There is much suffering, but still
there is time.
Believe that outside there is
still the good.
We are against fraud. The conduit
closes upon itself."
Differenty understood,
that is to say more focussed on the
subject of the paradigmatic conflict
and the repression around the energy
question and alien technologies, can
this text also be read as follows:
"Mind
those who are making money:
their misrepresentations of
reality and their broken
promises. One suffers a lot from
this, but it is not a lost cause
yet; keep believing that the
good will prevail in the world.
We turn away from deceit. The
manipulation will backfire upon
itself."
The
doubt about the authenticity of this
message is even more opposed by the
find of a message delivered earlier in
the summer of 1991 in the form of a
peculiar pattern in the crops of Milk
Hill, Engeland. It appeared there as a
response to a by tourists produced
crop-circle with the invitation 'talk to us' (see also Colin
Andrews in the Google video Alien
Signs). The pattern turned
out to be answering to all the demands
that are scientifically formulated for
circles to be counted as an authentic
crop pattern: electromagnetic
radiation, bent but not broken
stems, etc. It was a message in
strange letters that were analyzed as
being ancient Latin and said: OPPONO
ASTOS. Which means: we
are against fraud. Whatever it
may be concerning the authentic or
inauthentic of the phenomenon, this is
what the circle makers are after: to
fight fraud.
The
physicist and philosopher of science Thomas
Kuhn
(1922-1996) demonstrated that
historically one may speak of a
conflict of paradigms the way we know
them in a scientific sense from e.g.
of the transition in our world view
from the Ptolemeic
view
(geocentric) to the Copernican
perspective (heliocentric). And
also may we expect, with a new galactocentric way of
thinking from the perspective
of the force field of the universal
ether and the winning of energy
belonging to it, a struggle as a
consequence of the natural evolution
of our mindfulness. Such a struggle is
necessary for individual persons as
well as for entire cultures in order
to adapt ourselves mutually as also
adapt ourselves to nature and the
pressure exerted by her evolution. It
concerns a form of growth which is not
just taking place in the field of
science, but a growth which also will
have its consequences in the fields of
religion, politics and the economy.
With that broad spectrum concept of
growth in mind have we now with our
story arrived at the point of the need
for us to find out what in our culture
can be found of inventions that were
paradigmatically repressed. The labor
of the inventors and their inventions
that are partly destroyed and
forgotten, or that are concealed by
people with different interests, or
else simply are not noticed, must be
uncovered and exposed to proper public
and specialist scrutiny. Many an
inventor had to reconstruct his own
work even or had to reconstruct the
work of his predecessors that was
destroyed. We have to apply reverse
engineering on our own culture!
How was Tesla proceeding and what did
Reich exactly do? How does it all add
up theoretically with the effects they
all found? Of what remains after the
battles of the paradigmatic struggles
we may guess what in the past all has
been discovered by ourselves. Are we
able to recover from the damage we
suffered from the scientific
deprivation we ran into? The internet
offers us new chances to arrive at an
information-exchange and this pamphlet
is so part of that endeavor. So, what
have we found on the internet
concerning developments and
reconstructions of forgotten
technologies, while the rest of the
media couldn't keep up with it because
of the uncertainty of the novelty and
the preliminary nature of early
stages?
*1:
Wikipedia
about free energy suppression: it concerns the
conspiracy theory raised by the trauma
that one suffered in the paradigmatic
conflict. The refutation of the theory
is based upon the supposedly
non-operability of the inventions. But
the inventions have today 2008 for a
certain extend been replicated and
already been patented as well in a
number of cases.
-
-
|
