Pamphlet for a New
Energy Policy
3)
The paradigmatic
conflict
The
paradigmatic conflict between the
direct winning of energy at the one
hand and the existing transformation
of raw materials in association with
the secondary sustainable
technologies at the other hand has a
long history. The
conflict resulted in the destruction
and repression of the work of early
pioneers in this field like Nikola
Tesla (1846-1943), the
inventor of the alternating current,
and Wilhelm Reich
(1897-1957), who made several
discoveries in this line of research
(see also the article on Einstein, the ether
and relativism at this
site). After the death of Tesla were
his papers confiscated by the
american government and kept secret
because one didn't want his
inventions in the field of
weapons technology to end up
in the wrong hands. And with
that action were also many of his
inventions meant for the civil
society and inventions which could
be important for the development of
free energy technology relegated to
the darkness of ignorance. Already
during his lifetime had not only
Tesla great difficulty to keep the
status of and financial support for
his work with the increasing
eccentricity of his inventions, but
had also Reich troubles with his
invention of orgone energy - the
name he gave to free energy - about
which he had consulted Einstein.
Einstein had rejected him with the
message that there were alternative
explanations to be found, but
without him willing to continue with
the investigations. Nevertheless had
Reich irrevocably proven, against
the second law of thermodynamics,
that organic material by nature has
a slightly higher temperature than
inorganic material. With that
difference one then had the proof of
his orgone energy. Also people like
Viktor Schauberger (see video)
(1885-1958), and John E.W. Keely
(1827-1898) were not taken seriously
because of their energetic
interpretations of the force of the
ether, of which we now understand
that it had to be the dynamical
force of the relative ether the way
Einstein stated it later in his
career. Since Einstein had a shift
of paradigm taken place away from
Newton and Maxwell in which
scientists no longer could accept
such superseded ideas of the ether
as a uniform substance as being the
correct presentation of the state of
affairs in nature. The concept of
ether turned out to be a bit more
complicated thus. The concept of the
ether should not have been abandoned
though but had to be reassessed, and
that is what Einstein finally in
1920 did in public in a lecture in
Leyden, The Netherlands, where he
clearly spoke in defense of a
concept of ether which is based upon
the physical properties that
unmistakably are attached to the
reality of space. Matter, time and
space can factually not be
considered as separate things. They
define each other. This change of
mind of Einstein meant an enormous
shock for the science of physics and
lead to a great divide among its
members, a divide which the science
has never managed to overcome (see also Kostro
2000). Nevertheless is at
present of all the ether theories (aether
theories) the so-called Ae-theory of
Einstein the one most popular
among physicists. In this theory is one since
the eighties of the twentieth
century playing with the notion of a
universal concept of time and a
fixed frame of reference in space
which is at odds with the so-called
Lorentz invariance; it
amounts to the fact that one is
meddling with the dogma of the in
all directions invariant speed of
light which constitutes the basis
for the theory of relativity. In fact converted
Einstein with the revision of his
ether notion and turned he back to
the classical theories of the
universe that assign the ether an
all-important place in creation, be
it that he now considered also the
ether as relative, as a form of
space depending upon material
characteristics.
Of course
can only be spoken of progress when
the new way of thinking of modern
physics encompasses the old way, and
not so much when one tries to
reinvent the wheel of the classics
with a lot of ego. A 'theory of
everything' contains of course also
the truth of the past. Nikola Tesla
in the New York Times of 11 July
1935 said about Einstein's
descriptions: "magnificent
mathematical garb which
fascinates, dazzles and makes
people blind to the underlying
errors. The theory is like a
beggar clothed in purple whom
ignorant people take for a
king..., its exponents are
brilliant men but they are
metaphysicists rather than
scientists.." (see wikipedia article). Einstein
is not as concrete and clear as an
ingenious and original inventor and
engineer specialized in practicable
thinking als Tesla would like. One
doesn't all of a sudden have a 'new
theory of everything', an integer
paradigm. And Einstein's notion of a
relative ether was also not
something new either. His 'new
ether' can be retraced to the vedic
culture of India which we,
especially from the Hare Krishna's,
learned to know since the sixties of
the twentieth century. Therein is
the ether divided in three, in other
words: considered relative.
Vedically one speaks of three Vishnus
who each represent another part of
the ether (cosmic,
universal en local). Also the esoteric
philosopher Rudolf Steiner
(1861-1925), a contemporary of
Einstein, spoke of a relative ether:
the expanding warmth ether and the
light ether as opposed to the
contracting chemical or sound ether
and the life ether (with to the left
pictured the respective symbols).
History teaches us that
repressive progress, progress in
which previous developments are
entirely denied, repressed and
forgotten, leads to a serious
obstruction or else collapse of the
civilization in question. The roman
empire e.g. has, as a culture, as a
time system directed to the order of
the moon, in about two steps
abolished itself: first was by
Julius Caesar 45 B.C. the lunar
calendar abolished and replaced by a
solar calendar, and next was the
order of the week that was projected
upon the solar calendar, but still
knew its traditional lunar division,
for practical reasons (the market)
for the civil population abolished
by Constantine the Great in 321 A.D.
The correspondence with the moon (in
so-called Ides, Nones and Kalends)
was at the time definitely replaced
by the linear, not leaped order of
the week that was introduced by him
(for the monasterial rule was it by
the Christians maintained till the
end of the Middle Ages). Little more
than a hundred years after
Constantine introduced the linear
week, stormed the barbarians the
administratively and culturally
completely eroded city of Rome to be
plundered by a so-called 'primitive'
barbarian culture directed to...
indeed the lunar calendar! Also
Islam managed in the seventh century
A.D. with its prayer times to the
sun to put a foot in the european
cultural doorway of linear weeks and
is up to the present day in conflict
with it (as well with itself as with
the West). Repressive progress at
the cost of that what historically
preceded is thus no real progress at
all but a compensatory phenomenon.
There is renewal, but the synergy
does not improve: it crumbles only
further away. With the ego of the
renewal is easily the continuity
with the past broken, with the old
regime, and thus is one losing one's
integration and falls the culture
down. A common culture (or order of
time) can factually, if one wishes
to keep it in a working order, only
be expanded upon, one e.g. adds such
a complication as a solar calendar
or linear week to it, but the
inheritance of the thereto belonging
culture of the lunar calendar
preceding can't just like that be
erased from the collective memory or
the (genetically programmed)
consciousness of the natural
reality. If one nevertheless tries
to do that, is one in that case
grossly underestimating the power of
time conditionings. Within a culture
is a certain continuity needed when
one doesn't want to speak of a fall
down of that culture. Old mistakes
and imperfections must thus be
understood and remembered the way
one also commemorates wars, and
cannot be repressed just like that
just to get rid of the old misery.
The free energy researcher Peter
Lindeman states relating to this: "In
this society, theoretical science
has been elevated to a very high
level of prestige. Under this
system of belief, the real needs
of humanity have not been well
served. It is time that these
incorrect theories be carefully
examined and discarded, so that
experimental science can once
again take the leading role in
defining the nature of physical
reality. Only then will Etheric
Science be free to offer its
bounty of solutions to a desperate
and waiting world." History
will repeat itself if we haven't
learned from it, if we don't
remember what went wrong. The later
Julian calendar e.g. needed a
correction in the method of leaping
in order to accord with the
classical play of forces of the
ether, but the calendar shouldn't in
its entirety have been abolished,
the way the pope it at the end of
the Middle Ages did for the
monasteries. To be aware of
repression is something we learned
later on from the behavioral
science, or art, of psychoanalysis.
The unconscious is an enemy
facilitating a sudden change of
culture or a break of paradigm, a
change which because of that same
enemy of not being conscious is also
dangerous: on the personal level we
e.g. may remember it from the
popular song with the text 'suddenly
he was not the man he used to be'
the way the Beatles sang it in
'Yesterday'. Just as a breakdown can
change an individual human being
completely overnight, is also a war
on a collective scale capable of
changing people no-time into zombies
who no longer understand matters,
who are out of touch with their past
and change into animals. The
psychiatrist calls it decompensation
of the ego: the performance of
control can no longer be kept up.
The present
established, 'classical', indirect
method of winning energy based on
coal, oil and gas, which felt
threatened by the energy innovators
and inventors, has till the end of
the twentieth century, till very
recently thus, been very repressive
and destructive. That has not only
resulted in many a personal and
scientific drama, but has also
contributed to an obstruction of the
progress that mankind needs in order
to survive on this planet, we now
begin to realize. On e.g. the
webpage PESwiki-suppression and in the
Lightworks documentary Tesla and the
race to Zero point energy are many
cases discussed. One of the best
known is the suppression of Tesla by
his financier J.P. Morgan who
cancelled e.g. his entire Wardenclyffe
project of free
energy for the entire planet because
it couldn't generate any income. The
repression of this kind of
inventions as well as the
traumatized paranoia about the free energy
suppression1 associated
with it, can no longer be
maintained, even though the danger
of some inventions indeed mustn't be
underestimated and may justify a
certain secrecy. For this kind of
secrecy developed Tesla himself e.g.
a complex procedure about the
proliferation of a weapons system of
his in which he diminished the risk
of possible abuse as much as he
could by dividing the knowledge in
question over several governments of
the countries in the world: it would
only work if they would cooperate.
The threat of a total collapse of
the culture and the thereto
belonging world peace, the danger of
decompensation as the psychiatrist
calls it, with the repression of the
inventions in the field of the
direct winning of energy, is just as
well a clear and present danger. A
stressed culture may give an odd
response. For a long time one may
compensate for a lack of knowledge
and skills, with nice movies on
television e.g., but these
compensations are but a surrogate of
course, in the end there is only the
possibility of a new culture when
the essential knowledge thereof is
shared and handed down in the
educational system. Keeping people
ignorant one creates a sub-class
with the size of the base of a
pyramid relating to the top, and
thus having created has one that way
arrived at an inequality of citizens
which sooner or later, violent or
not, will result in a reaction like
it concerned something determined by
a law of nature. The way gaseous
molecules mix into a homogenous
mass, can also the equality among
people in the field of knowledge not
be stopped. Thus must we take care
not to throw away the child of the
continuity, the soul of the culture,
away with the bathing water of
renewal and innovation. And it
indeed seems to be so that we
collectively will have to change our
energy policy, whether we like it or
not. For the resources used in
non-sustainable energy are getting
depleted and the limits of what our
environment can bear are reached.
The indirect, renewable form of
winning energy keeps demanding for a
greater efficiency, which refers to
a more direct method of winning
sustainable energy. We simply have
to thus, however attached we are to
the old order of the secondary
policy of winning energy. For the
same reason of in the future having
to be vegetarians because the
production of meat is simply a very
inefficient way of producing
proteins which cannot be maintained
with increasing numbers of people on
the planet, must we also let go of
the old policy of winning energy and
the thereto belonging economical and
geopolitical strategies. We
therefore have to expand our view
with the extra concept of a primary
way of winning energy and thus
correct our relativistic paradigm
with the 'absolute relativity' of
the order of the primary energy in
the universe. The repression may not
become a decompensation but must,
politically correct, more or less
therapeutically, in a
psychologically responsible manner
be guided towards a revaluation of
the by many a 'modern' scientist so
very much despised concept of ether.
And in that case play as well the
new inventions a part as the notion
of a second 'converted' Einstein who
later on in 1920 said that he had
been too 'radical' in his rejection
of the ether as being a superfluous
and out-dated concept1.
We are
simply driven by the force of
evolution to which we all, as
energetic, ethereal, living beings
are subjected. We are dealing with a
compelling force of nature that is
mightier than the individual
decision of single persons, national
governments or supranational,
financial interest groups. And that
evolution followed probably quite a
different course from what we always
have thought it would have with
Charles Darwin. Modern skulls have
been found in layers of petrified
sediment of millions years old and
next to traces of dinosaurs have
been found just as old fossilized
foot prints of modern man2. The
ruling paradigm always represses the
anomaly - or the invention of an
alternative technology of winning
energy in our case - and the new
paradigm will have to integrate that
knowledge. The new energy
suppression is thus not so much a
matter of evil minded persons,
institutions or administrations, but
is more an intellectual problem of a
paradigmatic revolution. One has to
grasp it, drop out and then switch
over to it. Only if a majority does
this has the new paradigm arrived.
Till that time is everything of it
joyously ridiculed. It is the way
the philosopher Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
said it and after him also the
psychoanalyst S. Freud and the
SF-author Arthur C. Clarke: firstly
one is ridiculed, then one is
opposed and next is one accepted as
if it concerned the most common
thing in the world (see the
quotation at the beginning). It is a
known mechanism of which many
writers and artists can testify. To
be acknowledged, takes some time,
and that is thus also true for a new
technology. Nature commands us how
to behave, viz. to be adapted to
time and circumstance, and the same
way command our genes us as well as
the culture does we have developed
with it. To evolve, also culturally
thus, is more an established fact, a
cosmic necessity, a need which in
all her effects of refinement and
improvement of adaptations must be
retracable in all the worlds of
living, and thus also on other
planets if we could visit them. The
often from the side of the
government classified investigations
about UFO's, extraterrestrial life,
that is to say extraterrestrial
human, humanoid life and human
civilizations, point always in that
direction. Among scientists there is
no doubt that extraterrestrial life
with a high degree of civilization
exists (see e.g. the Drake-equation). The
problem is more in delivering the
proof, or better stated, in the
repression of the proof we have.
More and more is there in the past
couple of years (2005-2007) from the
side of the (american) government,
from military organizations and the
scientific community an increasing
openness. The proof that such an
intelligent, highly evolved culture
is observing us, was in the past
kept away from the public, if
necessary with disinformation,
intimidation or worse measures, in
order not to disturb the common man
and to prevent that one as a
government would be faced with
unwanted civil initiatives and
collective psychological problems.
One doesn't want to be embarrassed
with the then inevitably rising
demands for control and action one
administratively and scientifically
cannot immediately answer to. It is
for everyone an uncharted territory.
But it is also true that we in the
context of our subject mustn't just
look away from extraterrestrial
phenomena. In that context are we
namely faced with an alternative and
undoubtedly much more civilized,
energy policy and a better form of
self control of not just the
individual, but also of a better
science and culture of living
together in relation to gravity and
moving through time and space. In
that sense can the energy question
not be regarded separately from our
concepts of space, the order of
time, the forces of nature,
elementary particles and the
existence of more dimensions than
the three or four we acknowledge at
the moment. Let us therefore first
delve deeper into that what we have
witnessed to be true for our
extraterrestrial visitors, for we
are more conscious then of where we
are standing ourselves and what
remains to be done by us.
We learn
through observation, after first,
very socratically, having accepted
our ignorance, and mustn't assume
that we will learn anything if we
turn away from matters like these.
It takes courage, but it is also
very scientific, not to jump to
conclusions immediately but simply
admit that there might be something
we do not know. How else may one
discover anything? About
extraterrestrials and the energy
politics associated with them has
been produced a nice documentary
called: UFO: The
Greatest Story Ever Denied by
Joe Escamilla. Therein he answers
the question how and why the
american government, or in fact a
shadow government of national and
international institutes, have kept
UFO's and their free energy
technology a secret for the wider
public. There is mention of a group
of people, of whistle-blowers from
within the governmental institutions
in America, who stepped up to act
against the secrecy: the UFO Disclosure
Group (see also disclosure.net and some
dutch pages). In May
2001 they gave a press conference and posted
they on Google video's with
testimonial accounts (zie Video's 1 &2). The
present chairman is named dr. Steven Greer. He has a
site named AERO. Another
well-known protagonist is Stephen
Basset of the exopolitics
Paradigm Research
Group. These people state
that humanity is suffering too much
damage from the for political and
economical reasons, in combination
with billions of dollars consuming
so-called z.g. black projects (see
the video Billion Dollar
Secret), keeping secret
among other things the knowledge
already available of energy systems
of an alien origin. With this
knowledge are there, based on
reverse engineering of crashed
UFO's and contacts with aliens
themselves, already by human beings
manufactured ETV's, or extraterrestrial
vehicles, like the TR-3B
secret USAF craft. Also have free
energy technologies been classified.
One may be referred to the words of
the hacker Gary
Mackinnon (site, wiki, pagina, blog, interview), the
Google video presentation: The Case for
Antigravity, an
interview with the Area 51 specialist
Edgar Fouché, the
testimonies of physicist
Bob Lazar (video 1&2), the ex-Majestic
12 collaborator the
microbiologist Dan Burisch (video, interviews; page's, site, info) and a
lecture of Stan Deyo (site, book). But the
truth can despite of all the secrecy
not be stopped in this inevitable
cultural evolution towards a greater
planetary, humanoid awareness.
Countless patens have been awarded
the last hundred years concerning
UFO-technological inventions. The
researcher Luke Fortune bundled
since 1997 in five thick volumes
3200 pages of descriptions of 260
patents of replicable designs (see e.g. the
U.S. patents 3774865 en 10074934). There
are also designs from the
Nazi-germany era in which one tried
to use this technology to obtain
military superiority. The Germans,
who forced free energy inventors
like Victor
Schauberger to work
for them, called their prototypes 'rundflugzeuge',
or 'roundcrafts'. Their term for
space energy was 'vril-energie'
and they called their prototypes
Vrils (ranking up to number 8 see
right picture) and Haunebu's (up to
type III). Vril was a term in 1870
coined by Sir
Edward Bulwer-Lytton in a book
called Vril,
The Power of the Coming race (pdf), an
early science-fiction book of the
victorian writer who also wrote The
last Days of Pompei. The
roundcrafts were pretty crude iron
discs with a dome with windows, and
the prototypes actually worked! (German
site, pictures, s). In the
next chapter we will see how the
Nazi's who resented the
'american-jewish' science came up
with a free energy device as well.
Fortune states that the absence of
applications of these inventions is
mainly caused by the fact that the
usual means of propulsion and the
thereto belonging conventional ways
of winning energy are more
profitable. The initial impetus for
the new paradigm is undoubtedly
present in countless practically
applicable forms, but the culture
for it is simply not achieved yet.
The internet is part of this
paradigmatic development and runs in
many respects far ahead of the other
media, mainly because everyone may
contribute, whether serious or not,
and because of the fact that a
documentary on the internet sinks in
properly while on TV it by accident
has to be recorded to serve as study
material. More and more networks
post their essential materials on
the internet as we can see e.g. on their sites. On Google
and on YouTube one can study
countless professional and amateur
movies of often vague, but sometimes
also very convincing proofs of the
UFO-presence and the matter of free
energy. To begin with we would like
to refer to four sensational YouTube
movies from the UFO realm that raise
doubts by many because they appear
so real. In the next section will we
further expound on the energy
question. Of the following evidence
has not been proven that is was
faked.
1) A UFO
seen very nearby during a TV
documentary in Sarajevo,
Bosnia-Herzegovina 10 August 2005. Behind
the journalist giving his report
suddenly people look up to see there
together with him a UFO of a couple
of meters wide, as it slowly glides
away behind a building. (also here)
2) A UFO
very ceary visible with navigation
controls above a small river in
italy. A clearly visible
disc of three to four meters floats
above a small river showing some
technology of moving parts, after
which it suddenly flashes away as
fast as a bullit (see also
a computer generated version of a
similar group of UFO's pictured in
Mexico 2007).
3) A
challenging UFO viewed from a
helicopter close to the former
WTC-buidings - see also
version2. A UFO of
again a couple of meters wide shoots
away from behind a WTC building and
leaves behind, something which is
very uncommon, a condensation trail.
About a kilometer away it stops
mid-air and then races for the
helicopter from which everything is
recorded. Just before it would hit
the chopper the craft makes a sharp
turn right in front of it to race
away with lightning speed.
4) A UFO-wreck
thousands of years old found on
the moon during the Apollo 20
mission (video 2 - see also
another discussion of
other UFOs seen by NASA). Formally
the Apollo 20 mission is said to
have been cancelled in 1970 for
budgetary reasons, and thus never
would have taken place. In what thus
would be an elaborated and
sophisticated fake is seen how
slowly, with a scan of the lunar
surface, a peculiar vehicle
appears in sight of the
camera with a technical protusion
like a cockpit on top and alien
signs on the hull, as also meteor
impacts on top of it. Comments: 'this
vehice is in a bad condition, it
must be here for billions of years'. One says that
the recordings constitute a
cover-up to conceil the real
images of NASA. There exists
also a second version of the
sighting of the vehicle which
is shown below.
Concerning the
direct encounters with these
extraterrestrial civiliations is
there of the investgating
journalist, the renown UFO-expert Jaime Moussan, a good video of a
conference in Mexico to the
occasion of incidents there, in which
photographic materials of aliens,
together with their messages in the
form of the well known patterns in
the fields, the so-called crop
circles was discussed (see also our
other article about this). Sgt.
Clifford Stone (US Army) of the UFO
Disclosure Group mentions 57 different
species of aliens, of
which some can
be found onYouTube with
photographs that escaped the control
of governmental agencies (see also alienvideo.net). Next to
that is there a documentary about
UFOs in Russia called UFO KGB Secrets,
presented by Roger Moore, which
delivers very convincing proofs of
the existence of UFO's and the
secrecy by the russian government of
(sometimes violent) confrontations
with the interplanetary visitors,
including an autopsy on alien bodily
remains and photo materials of an in
the region of Sverdlovsky in 1968
crashed UFO (thus
independent of the Roswell-crash4). Also was
there, believe it or not, beginning
of 2007 a report of an
interview with an alien 3 to be seen
on Youtube which, as a top-secret
of the government, because the
copyrights would have been violated,
was removed from the internet. Later
on was it posted again though. The
picture at the left is from that
intervieuw. The existence of the
being named J-rod (EBE-2) is
confirmed by Dan Burisch, who did
extensive biochemical research on it
(see his declarations). There is
thus no lack of evidence from even
the most reliable sources. Within
the UFO Disclosure Group there are
witnesses from the NSA, FBI, CIA and
all departments of the armed forces
of America, who are often of the
highest security levels within these
world's most powerful and mighty
societal institutions. One of the
arguments they put forward is: ' absense
of evidence is no evidence of
absense', we musn't think that
these phenomena are fabrications of
hysterical people when secret
services are keeping matters like
these confidential. These people are
willing to testify even under oath
before congress of the
irrefutable reality of this for
mankind such an all-imporrant matter
reaching far beyond what the public
as yet has been allowed know.
The
spaceship on the moon that allegedly
was photographed by the Apollo 20
mission that formally never took
place.
The as a
consequence of conscious and
unconscious processes blocking of
the knowledge of such a humanoid
reality of civilization and
evolution, upon the reality of which
we collectively ought to employ
scientific reverse
engineering and be of
disclosure if we with a new cultural
integration want to succeed in
thinking along with it, can also be
understood as being the result of a
diseased mistrust held against
mankind by a mankind which doesn't
keep itself for incapable but for
unworthy and inferior. We already for
centuries have knowledge of UFO's
and have an
inferiority complex and a psychology
of repression about it (see also ufoevidence.org and crystallinks). Faced
with our shortcomings and
inferiority in a certain area of
interest - and why would that be
true for spiritual matters by the
way - do we tend to backwardness,
false pride and self-destruction.
Especially governments have a hard
time psychologically to admit to
anything of succeeding or failing in
matters of this concern. With
experts like Stanton T. Friedman (nuclear
physicist,see info-page) who
regularly testify of the
authenticity of the sightings, is in
the documentary of the secrets of
the KGB on these matters the
following comment presented by mouth
of the russian ufologist Tiurin
Avinsky: 'we are simply not capable
to cope with the knowledge and
technology of such a fundamentally
different paradigm nor able to copy
any of these designs' (to the right
a picture of the disc that was
salvaged by the military in
Sverdlovsky). One could
just as well show a computer to
someone from the roman empire. The
extraterrestrials think in terms of
traveling through dimensions, we in
terms of traveling trough a
three-dimensionally fixed reality. There
exists, so it appears from the
disclosures of the Disclosure Group,
thus a tension between the knowledge
kept secret and that what we
publicly know at the moment. Witnesses testify
of fully operational flying
saucers of more than thirty meters
wide that by us were copied. This
constitutes a cultural conflict
which cannot be maintained any
longer if we want to find closure on
the energy question. The
paradigmatic conflict expresses
itself time and again in the form of
disbelief and even in the form of
destructive reponses like
declarations of insanity and
accusations of fraud. One is
referred to all the reactions of
common folk on all the peculiar
movies on YouTube. Many, with among
them military people, air traffic
controllers, pilots and normal
citizens, lost their jobs because of
spilling the beans about this matter
and some even lost their lives with
it. One must consider these victims
of the repression to be heroes of
our evolution. In this repression
can collectively be recognized a
psychiatric pattern of a schizoid
and paranoid bordeline, politicized
sociopathic ego; a conflict of a
false, profit-minded control from
the side of individual, fearful
civilians and multinational
corporations at the other hand who
have themselves represented by
governments that, outside of the
democratic control want to pull the
strings (in a military/industrial
sense) with security levels ranking
even higher than the one of the
american president. The so-called. free
energy supression conspiracy
theories parallel to this are not
just some unjustified suspicions
based on individual failures that
are held against governmental
institutions and companies. It is a
long standing festering historical
phenomenon in which we at all cost
want to defend and maintain our
honor and control. It concerns a
struggle in which mankind gives
evidence of symptoms of what
factually are evolutionary pains,
growth pains in which not only
individuals come to a fall and have
to start all over with a new life,
but with which in the past as known
complete cultures fell down and rose
again. It can be compared to an
inverted mourning
process in which step by
step the new reality has to be
accepted and the old way of thinking
and repressively acting has to be
given up. UFOs are vehicles
originating from spaceborne
civilizations that abandon their
planet in a search for new worlds.
There they willing or unwillingly
inspire for a continuation of
humanity and the development of a
culture and offer they thus a
completly different picture of
evolution from the one we have
cherished till now. They constitute
a cosmic paradox: man abandons a
planet to promote and sustain the
life of man on the planet; and thus
it will also be when we ourselves
are etherborne. Their
civilization flourished together
with their planet. A flower blooms
and whithers away. Thus it also
fares with planets. But itself
having sprouted from seed produces
the flower more new seeds. Our human
culture and the biological
equilibrium here on earth is a
flower and the ethermachine, the vimana
as it in ancient vedic terms is
called here on earth, constitutes,
including the winning of energy from
the vacuum belonging to it, the seed
which leads to the flower meanwhile
originating from it as well. Some
propose that as a theory about our
origins, one may differ in opinion
on this, but as an actual practice
of a cultural lead can the
phenomenon simply no longer be
ignored (see for instance the
video's The Cosmic Plan and
the stories of Jim Sparks (en 2 and article), Riley
Martin (site) and
others like Jaime
Moussan who e.g. predict a
major turning point around the year
2012).
Many
UFO 's above Nürnberg, Germany 14
april 1561.
Hans Glaser woodcut from 1566, 5
years after it happened.
The
evolution of our science cannot
exist apart from the evolution of a
culture belonging to it and that
communication process will thus have
to unfold itself. An individual
nutcase has a secret science nobody
understands: he doesn't communicate,
cannot account for his actions and
submerges with it in a world of
schizophrenic delusions of
selfdestruction, of a complete
bewilderment in which all sense of
reality is lost. As good as an
individual person can fall ill when
he consequently in his evolution is
hindered on purpose - but not realy
aware of the dangers - with
fabricated and entertained
illusions, is it also possible that
a culture runs into a diseased
state. Exactly with keeping the
masses ignorant make the masses it
for themselves impossible to defend
themselves - or compete with -
foreign and also with alien
cultures. That is why we have
produced this in writing: that we
may arrive at the understanding that
we also must be alowed to develop a
defense, that we may find a way of
our own with the free energy and the
anti-gravitation of a better means
of transport than the polluting car
(see e.g. the inventors Hutchison and Searl and a powerpoint
presentation about anti-gravity and the
documentary Who killed the
electric car?). That
the aliens do understand us is
proven by a message which was found
in a series of cropcircles near
Chilbolton, Engeland that have
appeared since 2000 in consecutive
years. After first in 2001 having
projected a human face in a
digital point format was there
a message which constituted an
answer to the so-called Arecibo message that we
earthlings have sent into space
ourselves in 1974 (see also video). The
aliens answered with a similar
pattern and from that pattern
followed that they e.g. have a DNA
structure based upon Silicium next
to the carbonchemistry of which we
are built. Furthermore indicated
they also what their sending and
receiving equipment looked like -
see the graphic at the beginning of
this page - and appeared later on in
2002 in Winchester, Hapshire the
face of an alien in the crops that
contained a disc with a binary code
in ASCII. The authenticity of the
crop pattern seemed to be doubtful
according the researcher Freddy
Silva, but the source of the doubt
was partly retracable to Team
Satan, a
disinformation-organization of the
british secret service MI6, who
possibly are the successors of the
infamous Doug and Dave, two elderly
Englismen who stated that they
themselves had produced many of the
crop-circles; an untenable claim.
Team Satan is commercial, but to
produce as good a pattern as shown
here they cannot. The pattern of the
disc was analyzed by the
englishman Paul Vigay and was next
by the south-american researcher Jaime Moussan discussed
in his lecture. The
message would, somewhat
enigmatically, state the following:
"Beware of the
bearers
of false gifts and
the broken promises.
There is much suffering, but still
there is time.
Believe that outside there is
still the good.
We are against fraud. The conduit
closes upon itself."
Differenty
understood, that is to say more
focussed on the subject of the
paradigmatic conflict and the
repression around the energy
question and alien technologies, can
this text also be read as follows:
"Mind
those who are making money:
their misrepresentations of
reality and their broken
promises. One suffers a lot from
this, but it is not a lost cause
yet; keep believing that the
good will prevail in the world.
We turn away from deceit. The
manipulation will backfire upon
itself."
The doubt
about the authenticity of this
message is even more opposed by the
find of a message delivered earlier
in the summer of 1991 in the form of
a peculiar pattern in the crops of
Milk Hill, Engeland. It appeared
there as a response to a by tourists
produced crop-circle with the
invitation 'talk
to us' (see also
Colin Andrews in the Google video Alien Signs). The
pattern turned out to be answering
to all the demands that are
scientifically formulated for
circles to be counted as an
authentic crop pattern: electromagnetic
radiation, bent but not broken
stems, etc. It was a
message in strange letters that were
analyzed as being ancient Latin and
said: OPPONO ASTOS.
Which means: we are against
fraud. Whatever it may be
concerning the authentic or
inauthentic of the phenomenon, this
is what the circle makers are after:
to fight fraud.
The
physicist and philosopher of science
Thomas
Kuhn (1922-1996)
demonstrated that historically one
may speak of a conflict of paradigms
the way we know them in a scientific
sense from e.g. of the transition in
our world view from the Ptolemeic view
(geocentric) to the Copernican
perspective
(heliocentric). And also may we
expect, with a new galactocentric
way of thinking from the
perspective of the force field of
the universal ether and the winning
of energy belonging to it, a
struggle as a consequence of the
natural evolution of our
mindfulness. Such a struggle is
necessary for individual persons as
well as for entire cultures in order
to adapt ourselves mutually as also
adapt ourselves to nature and the
pressure exerted by her evolution.
It concerns a form of growth which
is not just taking place in the
field of science, but a growth which
also will have its consequences in
the fields of religion, politics and
the economy. With that broad
spectrum concept of growth in mind
have we now with our story arrived
at the point of the need for us to
find out what in our culture can be
found of inventions that were
paradigmatically repressed. The
labor of the inventors and their
inventions that are partly destroyed
and forgotten, or that are concealed
by people with different interests,
or else simply are not noticed, must
be uncovered and exposed to proper
public and specialist scrutiny. Many
an inventor had to reconstruct his
own work even or had to reconstruct
the work of his predecessors that
was destroyed. We have to apply reverse
engineering on our own
culture! How was Tesla proceeding
and what did Reich exactly do? How
does it all add up theoretically
with the effects they all found? Of
what remains after the battles of
the paradigmatic struggles we may
guess what in the past all has been
discovered by ourselves. Are we able
to recover from the damage we
suffered from the scientific
deprivation we ran into? The
internet offers us new chances to
arrive at an information-exchange
and this pamphlet is so part of that
endeavor. So, what have we found on
the internet concerning developments
and reconstructions of forgotten
technologies, while the rest of the
media couldn't keep up with it
because of the uncertainty of the
novelty and the preliminary nature
of early stages?
*1: Wikipediaabout free
energy suppression: concerns
the conspiracy theory raised by the
trauma that one suffered in the
paradigmatic conflict. The
refutation of the theory is based
upon the supposedly non-operability
of the inventions. But the
inventions have today 2008 for to a
certain extend been replicated and
already been patented as well in a
number of cases.
-
-
|