Pamphlet
for a New Energy Policy
2) Two policies of winning sustainable energy
Concerning sustainable energy there are two options: the indirect and
direct winning of sustainable energy. The indirect winning of the
energy free available in nature consists of the transformation of a
natural and materially perceptible impulse into electricity with the help of notably solar cells, windmills and
hydroelectric power stations. This is what the International Energy
agency calls the
first, the second and the third generation technologies of the previous
century:
- First
generation: the since the 19th century winning of energy from the
incineration of biomass like agricultural waste products, water power
via dams and energy from geothermal power, the direct at the surface
of the earth available heat like one has in Iceland.
- Second
generation: the during the twentieth century with more advanced
technologies winning of energy from the heat of the sun with heat pumps
or special buildings, from solar cells, from the force of the wind and
from biofuel or ethanol.
- Third
generation: the use at the beginning of the 21th century of
modern technologies still under development like biomass gassification, biorefinery, solarthermal power plants with mirrors and plates, and the deep in the earth winning
of geothermal energy by means of so-called hot-dry-rock power
plants operating on the heat of water pumped through deeper layers of
rock, and tidal power plants at the coast.
The energy that is available in nature must
thus with these technologies be generated from the material dynamics of
a specific natural phenomenon like solar radiation, wind, water, the
heat of the earth or biomass. These impulses are not constantly
present. During the night there is no sun. The wind stops blowing and
the river dries up or floods. Biomass depends upon harvesting and
seasons and the heat of the earth is not at all places as easily
accessible. Indirect winning of sustainable energy further demands the
investment of large sums of money in expensive water works, solar
panels, drilling and windmill farms. That energy must, in order to be
constantly available, be stored in batteries, fuel cells and such and
must next in the form of hydrogen or electricity be distributed and
sold via a grid or some other network. Thus runs the energy through a
complete circuit of human actions in the case of which must be spoken
of a major collective, material effort which also has political and
economical ramifications because of all the dependency of the
individual citizen and the civil population at large in relation to the
different nations, regions, institutions and commercial companies
playing a part in the generation of the power in question. This then
results in various social, economical, geopolitical en ecological
problems.
Directly
winning sustainable energy with the help of what next may be called the
fourth generation of technologies that at the beginning of the
21th century are not yet, or hardly, commercially available, entails
that one directly converts the energy that in the universe is
responsible for the in second instance finally appearing of sunlight,
wind and water power. God, as the creator of the universe that spins by
itself on the basis of its own primal energy, is in fact the inventor
of the one and only real perpetuum mobile which is the point of departure, which
constitutes the power source, of the free energy generator that is
needed for the direct winning of energy. This primal energy is in
physics known by the following terms:
1) Zero-point or ZP energy, the minimal energy laying at the foundation
of the cosmic complete. This energy is associated with the so-called
cosmic background radiation, a remnant of the Big Bang, and the
phenomenon that Helium doesn't freeze at the absolute point of zero
degrees on a Kelvin scale.
2) Vacuum energy, the energy inherent to the vacuum of outer
space which constitutes the foundation of the fundamental forces of
nature of the weak force, the strong force, the electromagnetic force
and gravity. This energy is associated with the so-called Casimir force
of a certain pressure of space that pushes two plates together that are
held at a microscopic distance.
3) Radiant Energy, the energy associated with the difference in electric
potential between the higher layers of the atmosphere and the earth. It
is about the free in nature available, longitudinal electromagnetic
waves which travel trough the medium of outer space that in the old
text books was called the ether (aether). That concept of ether
was at the end of the nineteenth century forgotten because of the
problems one had with delivering the scientific proof of its existence,
but recently has the concept again surfaced in the context of the
research done relating to the possibility of a direct winning of
renewable energy (see also this article, and compare it with: wikipedia).
These terms are more or less mutually
exchangeable because no sharp line can be dawn to set these forms of
energy apart. They may be considered as stemming from one and the same
source, as a function of the living universe, as a function of time.
They are all forms of space energy. Practically divided in three
different primal forms or fields of energy may that energy also be
described as a) the (dark) energy of the expansion of spacetime with its cosmic background
radiation, b) the energy of
the attraction around black holes in the middle of galaxies and c) the energy of the earth's magnetism and the gravitation of individual stars, moons and planets. The in the field of new energy research
internationally renown physicist Dr Tom Bearden
states that in the universe, in the vacuum of space, there exists an
energetic dipole of virtual energy particles or energy bubbles. These
particles, which uncertain as they are in their value constitute an
unlimited source of energy, are not in a perfect equilibrium but do
constitute together the stable state of outer space. The imbalance
consists of a so-called broken symmetry of the primal cosmic potency. This means that once in the
beginning the primal force was in a state of equilibrium, but that it
got disturbed, lost its balance and thus produced all kinds of effects
and forces. Because of that found finally the matter its existence of
the galaxies and other cosmic phenomena we also know as the creation.
Because of that disequilibrium does, so says Bearden, the universe
bubble in the vacuum of outer space with virtual energy particles that
according his notion are appearing and disappearing in a constant
flood. In the wider circle of quantum mechanics one also speaks of quantum foam. The astrophysicist Tom van Flandern states in this connection that we have to
discriminate between two forms of stable states: a state of parts that
do not move and a state of a sameness which is there from moment to
moment, but has moving parts which are constanly caught in the process
the way one has a waterfall (see the docu Energy from the
Vacuüm). And thus we
have in the stable state of outer space of the cosmic vacuum the
presence of this form of primal energy which behaves like a waterfall
with moving virtual energy particles. That dynamic dipole is in its
entirety finally responsible for the vitality of the biological
equilibrium on the planets and the stationary spinning of the moon
around the earth, the earth around the sun and the sun around the
centre of the Milky Way.
The states of the particles of the primal
energy - that is to say, of the 1) dissipative primal expansion and 2)
the attraction or contraction of the virtual bubbles or energy packages
(the quanta) -, constitute the original, cosmic, energetic dipole upon
which the new technology of the winning of free energy is based. They
constitute more or less the fundamental polarity of what we call the
time: the linear time of the expansion of the universe and the cyclic
time of creation with its celestial bodies that are characterized
by gravity. Thus may one with the direct winning of energy also speak
of a way of thinking and working that is associated with the way we are
dealing with the order of time. The by the time conditioned worlds of
living, have all their existence in the imbalanced but stable state of
the dynamically moving universe. With the primal energies of the
creation, which with the time is constantly on the move, may one thus
speak of a perceptible energetic effect, which science calls the cosmic
background radiation, wherein there is a minimal amount of energy at
the basis of the absolute zero of temperature. On the atomic and
subatomic level is this zero-point energy present, but it cannot be
addressed just like that because it concerns the lowest possible energy
of the system. That energy is not material, it is massless, and has no
specific three dimensional direction. That energy is chaotic, it is
dark, but is observable. Nevertheless constitutes that energy, as said,
with the dynamics of the stable state of the constant disequilibrium of
the universe a as good as unlimited and never ending source of energy,
even though it at the Zero Point level seems to be minimal and useless.
It is in the dynamical relationship between the different types
of space energy that a great potential is found. One may derive from it
as much as 40-50 Mw per cm3 of space according, among
others, the engineer Dr. Paul Czysz of the Disclosure Group we will
discuss in the next chapter. With that energy do we positively have,
secondarily as a derivative, a condensate, of that original primal,
natural energy of the spinning motor which is the universe, with the
energy of the sun about which we turn, sunlight without burning up in
it, with the atmosphere the wind without having that atmosphere blown
away, with the differences in altitude and the evaporation on earth,
the power of the water without us washing away or running dry and have
we the heat of the earth without us melting into the magma.
There
is electric potential in outer space. We can tell this e.g. from the northern lights, the so-called aurora, which is the
luminescence in the atmosphere caused by the stream of charged
particles emitted by the sun. We also see that the radiant energy of
space delivers regularly a short cut in the form of lightning. Yet do
we not know how to connect our wires to that electric potential of
space, the space that is defined by first of all the local magnetic and
gravitational fields of what Einstein called 'curved space'. And
secondly do we have the universal fields of gravity in between the
stars and planets which we also call the virtual polar force of the
vacuum, and have thirdly the 'darker', intergalactic energy, the energy
of spacetime, the energy of the expanding universe. That energy of the
different forms of space we cannot as easily address because it is
chaotic after all. The bubbling of the particles delivers no directly
usable electricity, because it so, as the inventor John Bedini states it, is negative or potential energy which can only
be perceived when it as an extra 'radiant' effect in the
opposite direction with a current of electrons runs in a circuit. With
that effect is matter constantly looking for its original primal state
of singularity. That energy we must manage to catch with a machine
which transforms the negative energy into usable overunity energy
or an extra surplus current, and then we have a system which delivers
more energy than we have put in. The regular electrotechnical science
of engineering excludes that surplus constantly from the system as
being interference and thus ignores the pressure of the 'bubbling
operation' of the cosmic dipole of the vacuum. Normal electrotechnical
engineering kills the dipole making a voracious energy system eating up
the entire globe instead and achieves that way thus never any overunity
in catching the freely available energy of space. The energy of a
battery running a clock one can use to light a lamp, but to isolate the
energy which makes the universe of the planets and the stars spin and
harness it for our own use is another matter. Where is that battery
hidden? That battery is virtual, or, it is only there as a potency, as
a possibility we can only address with a contraption that makes it work
for us. With the classical electrotechnical approach we do not know
exactly how we directly must make use of the broken symmetry of the primal matter, and thus, seems initially the primary
energy of the planetary and solar magnetism, the free radiation and the
vacuum energy of outer space and the gravity of black holes, to be a form
of energy we can only win indirectly from water works, solar cells and
windmills and such.
The interaction of the local fields, the galactic fields
and the spacetime cosmic force field - or the effects of spacetime the
way Einstein likes to state it - is what finally results in the
movement of the luminaries. Modern physics prefers not to not speak
anymore about ethereal force fields, because that force, chaotic as it
is, is difficult to prove by experiment.  There is
only the indirect proof of certain spacetime effects. In the end of the
modern analysis constitutes the time as an extra dimension to our space
a fourth dimension, a dimension which can only properly be seen with a
very strong telescope. Only in second instance can we with the indirect
proof see the movement of water and light (as the thinnest matter of
fotons) on our planet. But the underlying structure is as complex as a cube of Rubic with an extra dimension. All we see are the derivations of
the primal energy. And whether we therewith in a modern sense speak of
spacetime indentations or of ethereal fields is merely a matter of
language. There is energy to be found within creation. That is a fact,
otherwise there wouldn't be any movement, any time. All matter and its
relations, all time phenomena, are manifestations of the cosmic energy
and it is that energy that we as sustainable energy, with some
inventive dexterity as we will see later on, may convert into
electricity. In order to obtain the dynamical energy of the
electricity, or the mechanical moment, which we need with the direct
winning of the original energy in nature are therefore these
energy-converters, these generators or transformers needed that
transform the 1) at zero-point outward pushing of the dissipative force
2) the bubbling interaction of the vacuumpolar force of the
threedimensional realm of attraction and 3) the radiant energy of the
multidimensional integrative forcefields present in nature - in one
word thus transform the energy of the 'great battery' existing all
around us. When we in that case manage to have motors, like the
Monopole Magnetic Motor of Bedini (see the logo
of his website), running on
that energy source, are we free from the tedious, risky and less
efficiënt procedures we have to follow with the indirect method of
winning secondary sustainable energy. This winning of the free energy
without the go-between of the sun, the wind, water and other media, may
be called ideal because it, independent and for all places, is the most
efficient way and offers the least chance of environmental disturbances
and disturbances in the balance of the powers of our human civilization
the way they from an emancipatory perspecive are supposed to be.
The
direct winning of sustainable energy thus constitutes a paradigmatic
problem. We always thought that machines running on their own without
any perceptible input of fuel or another energy source, in other words
machines that are perpetuum mobiles, are not possible. And now must we
take chaotic, massless energy into consideration as a serious
possibility. Of course does a machine not run without any input. But
with such a predominantly invisible source of the space energy as
discussed, must we think entirely different 'outside the box' about
cause and effect concerning the energetic relations in nature. It is no
longer a tangible, clearly demonstrable process. It demands an
explanation of energetic processes which we without further ado
couldn't accept from within the method of an indirect winning within
the confines of the scientific thought model of the twentieth century.
Patent counsels don't want to have anything to do with unknown energy
sources, for such a thing falls within the category of deceit and
fraud. Overunity, or to have more output than input is a taboo.
We seem to break the laws of nature which are held as valid for the
visible world when we organize the chaotic energy of space, of the
battery of the universe.  And
yet, so defends Bearden, are we not in offense with the laws of nature
or are we stating something new. Scholars in the past have said this
all sometime or other. It is just a matter of effective implementation
in such a way that we, beginning of the 21th century, let's say in 2020
or 2030, can purchase these free-energy generators in the shop or
collectively put them at work in powerplants and thus generate our
sustainable free energy directly. This science may have taken
birth, much has been discovered already, but the child is still in the
cradle, commercially and educationally it is not capable of standing
its own ground yet at the beginning of the 21th century. To the normal
science of people talking afer people it seems to be something
impossible. To them is winning energy from the apparent 'void' nothing
but envy with God, for He is the one and only inventor, the only real
patent holder of the selfrunning machine that is the universe. And that
wouldn't just be heresy, it would be in conflict with the most modern
religion of physics which fights for the conservation of the law of
conservation of energy! A battery of e.g. 'dark energy' does not exist
in such a view, one cannot get hold of such a thing or else it would be
too far away somewhere in the center of our universe. The usual ways
are then revolutionized and with that we fear the worst.
But okay, as the philosopher Descartes said and the way we will also discuss it further on: all of
matter is a transformation of the ether and empty space is something
that does not exist. According him consists the universe entirely of
interlocked and mutually influencing force fields and also Einstein had
in 1920 to admit in writing just before his lecture about this in
Leyden that he had been too radical in his denial of the ether and that
space without physical properties is something unthinkable. When we
want to find proper closure in this energy question are we concerned
with the, in a direct way, addressing of the energy of that physical
property of space about which Einstein spoke. We must therewith
relating to our 'fears of conservation' to that again, for purposes of
clarity, as an axiom, explicitly state that there is no question of
creating energy from the 'void' with these free-energy generators, or
that we somehow would manufacure energy, but that we are deriving from
an existing and scientifically acknowledged, natural source as the 'dark energy', 'zero-point energy', 'vacuum energy' or 'radiant energy', which is associated with what we call
spacetime, or else the compelling force of time in the vacuum of
stellar space, or else the polar electromagnetic energy of the
celestial bodies, of magnets and of crystals themselves. The essence of the secret of
winning energy from the vacuum is by Bearden summarized as follows: "There is no problem at all
in extracting all the energy one wishes from the active vacuum,
anywhere in the universe, at any time. Just make a dipole. The problem
is in (1) catching some of that freely gushing EM energy in a circuit
containing a load, and (2) dissipating the caught and collected EM
energy in that load to power it, without using half the caught energy
to destroy the source dipole's. That is the ONLY real energy problem on
the planet, and always has been." Next to that states he concerning
the definitions we mentioned for purposes of clarity the following: "Energy
from the Vacuum is NOT zero point energy, since the latter is an
observable state and the vacuum energy is nonobservable." With such
a formulation and the distinction between the manifest as opposed to
the non-manifest of natural energy, do we positively have the chance of
a successful change of paradigm that is capable of solving the energy
problems and the problems associated with the energy question with
which mankind now at the beginning of the 21th century is struggling.
-
-
|
