Pamphlet
for a New Energy Policy
3) The paradigmatic conflict
The paradigmatic conflict between the direct
winning of energy at the one hand and the existing transformation of
raw materials in association with the secondary sustainable
technologies at the other hand has a long history. The conflict resulted in the destruction and repression of
the work of early pioneers in this field like Nikola Tesla (1846-1943), the inventor of the alternating current, and Wilhelm Reich (1897-1957), who made several discoveries in this line of
research (see also the article on Einstein, the ether and
relativism at this site).
After the death of Tesla were his papers confiscated by the american
government and kept secret because one didn't want his inventions in the field of weapons technology to end up in the  wrong
hands. And with that action were also many of his inventions meant for
the civil society and inventions which could be important for the
development of free energy technology relegated to the darkness of
ignorance. Already during his lifetime had not only Tesla great
difficulty to keep the status of and financial support for his work
with the increasing eccentricity of his inventions, but had also Reich
troubles with his invention of orgone energy - the name he gave to free
energy - about which he had consulted Einstein. Einstein had rejected
him with the message that there were alternative explanations to be
found, but without him willing to continue with the investigations.
Nevertheless had Reich irrevocably proven, against the second law of
thermodynamics, that organic material by nature has a slightly higher
temperature than inorganic material. With that difference one then had
the proof of his orgone energy. Also people like Viktor Schauberger (see video) (1885-1958), and John E.W. Keely (1827-1898) were not taken seriously because of their
energetic interpretations of the force of the ether, of which we now
understand that it had to be the dynamical force of the relative ether
the way Einstein stated it later in his career. Since Einstein had a
shift of paradigm taken place away from Newton and Maxwell in which
scientists no longer could accept such superseded ideas of the ether as
a uniform substance as being the correct presentation of the state of
affairs in nature. The concept of ether turned out to be a bit more
complicated thus. The concept of the ether should not have been
abandoned though but had to be reassessed, and that is what Einstein
finally in 1920 did in public in a lecture in Leyden, The Netherlands,
where he clearly spoke in defense of a concept of ether which is based
upon the physical properties that unmistakably are attached to the
reality of space. Matter, time and space can factually not be
considered as separate things. They define each other. This change of
mind of Einstein meant an enormous shock for the science of physics and
lead to a great divide among its members, a divide which the science
has never managed to overcome (see also Kostro 2000). Nevertheless is at present of all the ether theories (aether theories) the so-called Ae-theory of Einstein the one most popular among physicists. In
this  theory
is one since the eighties of the twentieth century playing with the
notion of a universal concept of time and a fixed frame of reference in
space which is at odds with the so-called Lorentz invariance; it amounts to the fact that one is meddling
with the dogma of the in all directions invariant speed of light which
constitutes the basis for the theory of relativity. In fact converted Einstein
with the revision of his ether notion and turned he back to the
classical theories of the universe that assign the ether an
all-important place in creation, be it that he now considered also the
ether as relative, as a form of space depending upon material
characteristics.
Of course
can only be spoken of progress when the new way of thinking of modern
physics encompasses the old way, and not so much when one tries to
reinvent the wheel of the classics with a lot of ego. A 'theory of
everything' contains of course also the truth of the past. Nikola Tesla
in the New York Times of 11 July 1935 said about Einstein's
descriptions: "magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates,
dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is
like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a
king..., its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists
rather than scientists.." (see wikipedia article). Einstein is not as concrete and clear as an ingenious and
original inventor and engineer specialized in practicable thinking als
Tesla would like. One doesn't all of a sudden have a 'new theory of
everything', an integer paradigm. And Einstein's notion of a relative
ether was also not something new either. His 'new ether' can be
retraced to the vedic culture of India which we, especially from the
Hare Krishna's, learned to know since the sixties of the twentieth
century. Therein is the ether divided in three, in other words:
considered relative. Vedically one speaks of three Vishnus who
each represent another part of the ether (cosmic, universal en local). Also  the esoteric philosopher Rudolf
Steiner (1861-1925), a contemporary of Einstein, spoke of a relative
ether: the expanding warmth ether and the light ether as opposed to the
contracting chemical or sound ether and the life ether (with to the
left pictured the respective symbols).
History teaches us that repressive progress, progress in
which previous developments are entirely denied, repressed and
forgotten, leads to a serious obstruction or else collapse of the
civilization in question. The roman empire e.g. has, as a culture, as a
time system directed to the order of the moon, in about two steps
abolished itself: first was by Julius Caesar 45 B.C. the lunar calendar
abolished and replaced by a solar calendar, and next was the order of
the week that was projected upon the solar calendar, but still knew its
traditional lunar division, for practical reasons (the market) for the
civil population abolished by Constantine the Great in 321 A.D. The
correspondence with the moon (in so-called Ides, Nones and Kalends) was
at the time definitely replaced by the linear, not leaped order of the
week that was introduced by him (for the monasterial rule was it by the
Christians maintained till the end of the Middle Ages). Little more
than a hundred years after Constantine introduced the linear week,
stormed the barbarians the administratively and culturally completely
eroded city of Rome to be plundered by a so-called 'primitive'
barbarian culture directed to... indeed the lunar calendar! Also Islam
managed in the seventh century A.D. with its prayer times to the sun to
put a foot in the european cultural doorway of linear weeks and is up
to the present day in conflict with it (as well with itself as with the
West). Repressive progress at the cost of that what historically
preceded is thus no real progress at all but a compensatory phenomenon.
There is renewal, but the synergy does not improve: it crumbles only
further away. With the ego of the renewal is easily the continuity with
the past broken, with the old regime, and thus is one losing one's
integration and falls the culture down. A common culture (or order of
time) can factually, if one wishes to keep it in a working order, only
be expanded upon, one e.g. adds such a complication as a solar calendar
or linear week to it, but the inheritance of the thereto belonging
culture of the lunar calendar preceding can't just like that be erased
from the collective memory or the (genetically programmed)
consciousness of the natural reality. If one nevertheless tries to do
that, is one in that case grossly underestimating the power of time
conditionings. Within a culture is a certain continuity needed when one
doesn't want to speak of a fall down of that culture. Old mistakes and
imperfections must thus be understood and remembered the way one also
commemorates wars, and cannot be repressed just like that just to get
rid of the old misery. The free energy researcher Peter
Lindeman states relating to this: "In this society, theoretical science has been
elevated to a very high level of prestige. Under this system of belief,
the real needs of humanity have not been well served. It is time that
these incorrect theories be carefully examined and discarded, so that
experimental science can once again take the leading role in defining
the nature of physical reality. Only then will Etheric Science be free
to offer its bounty of solutions to a desperate and waiting world."
History will repeat itself if we haven't learned from it, if we don't
remember what went wrong. The later Julian calendar e.g. needed a
correction in the method of leaping in order to accord with the
classical play of forces of the ether, but the calendar shouldn't in
its entirety have been abolished, the way the pope it at the end of the
Middle Ages did for the monasteries. To be aware of repression is
something we learned later on from the behavioral science, or art, of
psychoanalysis. The unconscious is an enemy facilitating a sudden
change of culture or a break of paradigm, a change which because of
that same enemy of not being conscious is also dangerous: on the
personal level we e.g. may remember it from the popular song with the
text 'suddenly he was not the man he used to be' the way the
Beatles sang it in 'Yesterday'. Just as a breakdown can change an
individual human being completely overnight, is also a war on a
collective scale capable of changing people no-time into zombies who no
longer understand matters, who are out of touch with their past and
change into animals. The psychiatrist calls it decompensation of the
ego: the performance of control can no longer be kept up.
The present established, 'classical',
indirect method of winning energy based on coal, oil and gas, which
felt threatened by the energy innovators and inventors, has till the
end of the twentieth century, till very recently thus, been very
repressive and destructive. That has not only resulted in many a
personal and scientific drama, but has also contributed to an
obstruction of the progress that mankind needs in order to survive on
this planet, we now begin to realize. On e.g. the webpage PESwiki-suppression and in the Lightworks documentary Tesla and the race
to Zero point energy are
many cases discussed. One of the best known is the suppression of Tesla
by his financier J.P. Morgan who cancelled e.g. his entire Wardenclyffe project of free energy for the entire planet because it
couldn't generate any income. The repression of this kind of inventions
as well as the traumatized paranoia about the free energy suppression1 associated with it, can no longer be
maintained, even though the danger of some inventions indeed mustn't be
underestimated and may justify a certain secrecy. For this kind of
secrecy developed Tesla himself e.g. a complex procedure about the
proliferation of a weapons system of his in which he diminished the
risk of possible abuse as much as he could by dividing the knowledge in
question over several governments of the countries in the world: it
would only work if they would cooperate. The threat of a total collapse
of the culture and the thereto belonging world peace, the danger of
decompensation as the psychiatrist calls it, with the repression of the
inventions in the field of the direct winning of energy, is just as
well a clear and present danger. A stressed culture may give an odd
response. For a long time one may compensate for a lack of knowledge
and skills, with nice movies on television e.g., but these
compensations are but a surrogate of course, in the end there is only
the possibility of a new culture when the essential knowledge thereof
is shared and handed down in the educational system. Keeping people
ignorant one creates a sub-class with the size of the base of a pyramid
relating to the top, and thus having created has one that way arrived
at an inequality of citizens which sooner or later, violent or not,
will result in a reaction like it concerned something determined by a
law of nature. The way gaseous molecules mix into a homogenous mass,
can also the equality among people in the field of knowledge not be
stopped. Thus must we take care not to throw away the child of the
continuity, the soul of the culture, away with the bathing water of
renewal and innovation. And it indeed seems to be so that we
collectively will have to change our energy policy, whether we like it
or not. For the resources used in non-sustainable energy are getting
depleted and the limits of what our environment can bear are reached.
The indirect, renewable form of winning energy keeps demanding for a
greater efficiency, which refers to a more direct method of winning
sustainable energy. We simply have to thus, however attached we are to
the old order of the secondary policy of winning energy. For the same
reason of in the future having to be vegetarians because the production
of meat is simply a very inefficient way of producing proteins which
cannot be maintained with increasing numbers of people on the planet,
must we also let go of the old policy of winning energy and the thereto
belonging economical and geopolitical strategies. We therefore have to
expand our view with the extra concept of a primary way of winning
energy and thus correct our relativistic paradigm with the 'absolute
relativity' of the order of the primary energy in the universe. The
repression may not become a decompensation but must, politically
correct, more or less therapeutically, in a psychologically responsible
manner be guided towards a revaluation of the by many a 'modern'
scientist so very much despised concept of ether. And in that case play
as well the new inventions a part as the notion of a second 'converted'
Einstein who later on in 1920 said that he had been too 'radical' in
his rejection of the ether as being a superfluous and out-dated concept1.
We are
simply driven by the force of evolution to which we all, as energetic,
ethereal, living beings are subjected. We are dealing with a compelling
force of nature that is mightier than the individual decision of single
persons, national governments or supranational, financial interest
groups. And that evolution followed probably quite a different course
from what we always have thought it would have with Charles Darwin.
Modern skulls have been found in layers of petrified sediment of
millions years old and next to traces of dinosaurs have been found just
as old fossilized foot prints of modern man2. The ruling paradigm always represses the anomaly - or the
invention of an alternative technology of winning energy in our case -
and the new paradigm will have to integrate that knowledge. The new
energy suppression is thus not so much a matter of evil minded persons,
institutions or administrations, but is more an intellectual problem of
a paradigmatic revolution. One has to grasp it, drop out and then
switch over to it. Only if a majority does this has the new paradigm
arrived. Till that time is everything of it joyously ridiculed. It is
the way the philosopher Schopenhauer (1788-1860) said it and after him also the psychoanalyst S.
Freud and the SF-author Arthur C. Clarke: firstly one is ridiculed,
then one is opposed and next is one accepted as if it concerned the
most common thing in the world (see the quotation at the beginning). It
is a known mechanism of which many writers and artists can testify. To
be acknowledged, takes some time, and that is thus also true for a new
technology. Nature commands us how to behave, viz. to be adapted to
time and circumstance, and the same way command our genes us as well as
the culture does we have developed with it. To evolve, also culturally
thus, is more an established fact, a cosmic necessity, a need which in
all her effects of refinement and improvement of adaptations must be
retracable in all the worlds of living, and thus also on other planets
if we could visit them. The often from the side of the government
classified investigations about UFO's, extraterrestrial life, that is
to say extraterrestrial human, humanoid life and human civilizations,
point always in that direction. Among scientists there is no doubt that
extraterrestrial life with a high degree of civilization exists (see
e.g. the Drake-equation). The problem is more in delivering the
proof, or better stated, in the repression of the proof we have. More
and more is there in the past couple of years (2005-2007) from the side
of the (american) government, from military organizations and the
scientific community an increasing openness. The proof that such an
intelligent, highly evolved culture is observing us, was in the past
kept away from the public, if necessary with disinformation,
intimidation or worse measures, in order not to disturb the common man
and to prevent that one as a government would be faced with unwanted civil initiatives and collective psychological problems. One
doesn't want to be embarrassed with the then inevitably rising demands
for control and action one administratively and scientifically cannot
immediately answer to. It is for everyone an uncharted territory. But
it is also true that we in the context of our subject mustn't just look
away from extraterrestrial phenomena. In that context are we namely
faced with an alternative and undoubtedly much more civilized, energy
policy and a better form of self control of not just the individual,
but also of a better science and culture of living together in relation
to gravity and moving through time and space. In that sense can the
energy question not be regarded separately from our concepts of space,
the order of time, the forces of nature, elementary particles and the
existence of more dimensions than the three or four we acknowledge at
the moment. Let us therefore first delve deeper into that what we have
witnessed to be true for our extraterrestrial visitors, for we are more
conscious then of where we are standing ourselves and what remains to
be done by us.
We learn
through observation, after first, very socratically, having accepted
our ignorance, and mustn't assume that we will learn anything if we
turn away from matters like these. It takes courage, but it is also
very scientific, not to jump to conclusions immediately but simply
admit that there might be something we do not know. How else may one
discover anything? About extraterrestrials and the energy politics
associated with them has been produced a nice documentary called: UFO: The Greatest
Story Ever Denied by
Joe Escamilla. Therein he answers the question how and why the american
government, or in fact a shadow government of national and
international institutes, have kept UFO's and their free energy
technology a secret for the wider public. There is mention of a group
of people, of whistle-blowers from within the governmental institutions
in America, who stepped up to act against the secrecy: the UFO Disclosure Group (see also disclosure.net and some dutch pages). In May 2001 they gave a press conference and posted they on Google video's with
testimonial accounts (zie Video's 1
&2).
The present chairman is named dr. Steven Greer. He has a site named AERO.
Another well-known protagonist is Stephen Basset of the exopolitics Paradigm Research Group. These people state that humanity is
suffering too much damage from the for political and economical
reasons, in combination with billions of dollars consuming so-called
z.g. black projects (see the video Billion Dollar Secret), keeping secret among other things the
knowledge already available of energy systems of an alien origin. With
this knowledge are there, based on reverse engineering of
crashed UFO's and contacts with aliens themselves, already by human
beings manufactured ETV's, or extraterrestrial vehicles, like
the TR-3B secret USAF craft. Also have free energy technologies been
classified. One may be referred to the words of the hacker Gary Mackinnon (site,
wiki,
pagina, blog,
interview), the
Google video presentation: The Case for
Antigravity, an interview
with the Area 51 specialist
Edgar Fouché, the
testimonies of physicist Bob Lazar
(video 1&2),
the ex-Majestic 12 collaborator the microbiologist Dan Burisch (video,
interviews; page's,
site, info) and a lecture of Stan Deyo (site,
book).
But the truth can despite of all the secrecy not be stopped in this
inevitable cultural evolution towards a greater planetary, humanoid
awareness. Countless patens have been awarded the last hundred years
concerning UFO-technological inventions. The researcher Luke Fortune
bundled since 1997 in five thick volumes 3200 pages of descriptions of
260 patents of replicable  designs (see e.g. the U.S. patents 3774865 en 10074934). There are also designs from the Nazi-germany era in which
one tried to use this technology to obtain military superiority. The
Germans, who forced free energy inventors like Victor Schauberger to work for them, called their prototypes 'rundflugzeuge',
or 'roundcrafts'. Their term for space energy was 'vril-energie'
and they called their prototypes Vrils (ranking up to number 8 see
right picture) and Haunebu's (up to type III). Vril was a term in 1870
coined by Sir Edward Bulwer-Lytton in a book called Vril, The Power of the Coming race (pdf), an early science-fiction book of the victorian
writer who also wrote The last Days of Pompei. The roundcrafts were pretty crude iron
discs with a dome with windows, and the prototypes actually worked! (German site, pictures, s).
In the next chapter we will see how the Nazi's who resented the
'american-jewish' science came up with a free energy device as well.
Fortune states that the absence of applications of these inventions is
mainly caused by the fact that the usual means of propulsion and the
thereto belonging conventional ways of winning energy are more
profitable. The initial impetus for the new paradigm is undoubtedly
present in countless practically applicable forms, but the culture for
it is simply not achieved yet. The internet is part of this
paradigmatic development and runs in many respects far ahead of the
other media, mainly because everyone may contribute, whether serious or
not, and because of the fact that a documentary on the internet sinks
in properly while on TV it by accident has to be recorded to serve as
study material. More and more networks post their essential materials
on the internet as we can see e.g. on their sites. On Google and on YouTube one can study
countless professional and amateur movies of often vague, but sometimes
also very convincing proofs of the UFO-presence and the matter of free
energy. To begin with we would like to refer to four sensational
YouTube movies from the UFO realm that raise doubts by many because
they appear so real. In the next section will we further expound on the
energy question. Of the following evidence has not been proven that is
was faked.
 1) A UFO seen very nearby during a TV
documentary in Sarajevo,
Bosnia-Herzegovina 10 August 2005. Behind the journalist giving his report suddenly people
look up to see there together with him a UFO of a couple of meters
wide, as it slowly glides away behind a building. (also here)
2) A UFO very ceary visible with navigation
controls above a small river in italy. A clearly visible disc of three to four meters floats
above a small river showing some technology of moving parts, after
which it suddenly flashes away as fast as a bullit (see also a computer generated version of a similar group of
UFO's pictured in Mexico 2007).
3) A challenging UFO viewed from a helicopter
close to the former WTC-buidings - see also version2. A UFO of again a couple of meters wide shoots away from
behind a WTC building and leaves behind, something which is very
uncommon, a condensation trail. About a kilometer away it stops mid-air
and then races for the helicopter from which everything is recorded.
Just before it would hit the chopper the craft makes a sharp turn right
in front of it to race away with lightning speed.
4) A UFO-wreck thousands
of years old found on the moon during the Apollo 20 mission (video 2 - see also another discussion of other
UFOs seen by NASA). Slowly
with a scan of the lunar surface appears a peculiar vehicle in sight of
the camera with a technical protusion like a cockpit on top and alien
signs on the hull, as also meteor impacts on top of it. Comments: 'this
vehice is in a bad condition, it must be here for billions of years'.
Concerning the direct encounters with these
extraterrestrial civiliations is there of the investgating journalist,
the renown UFO-expert Jaime Moussan, a good video of a
conference in Mexico to the occasion of incidents there, in which photographic materials of aliens,
together with their messages in the form of the well known patterns in
the fields, the so-called crop circles was discussed (see also our
other article about this). Sgt. Clifford Stone (US Army) of the UFO
Disclosure Group mentions 57 different species of aliens, of which some can be found onYouTube with photographs that escaped the control of governmental
agencies (see also alienvideo.net). Next to that is there a documentary about UFOs in Russia
called UFO KGB Secrets,
presented by Roger Moore,
which delivers very convincing proofs of the existence of UFO's and the
secrecy by the russian government of (sometimes violent) confrontations
with the interplanetary visitors, including an autopsy on alien bodily
remains and photo materials of an in the region of Sverdlovsky in 1968
crashed UFO (thus independent
of the Roswell-crash4). Also was there, believe it or not,
beginning of 2007 a report of an
interview with an alien 3 to be
seen on Youtube which, as a top-secret of the government,
because the copyrights would have been violated, was removed from the
internet. Later on was it posted again though. The picture at the left
is from that intervieuw. The existence of the being named J-rod (EBE-2)
is confirmed by Dan Burisch, who did extensive biochemical research on
it (see his declarations). There is thus no lack of evidence from
even the most reliable sources. Within the UFO Disclosure Group there
are witnesses from the NSA, FBI, CIA and all departments of the armed
forces of America, who are often of the highest security levels within
these world's most powerful and mighty societal institutions. One of
the arguments they put forward is: ' absense of evidence is no
evidence of absense', we musn't think that these phenomena are
fabrications of hysterical people when secret services are keeping
matters like these confidential. These people are willing to testify
even under oath before congress of the irrefutable reality of
this for mankind such an all-imporrant matter reaching far beyond what
the public as yet has been allowed know.
The spaceship on
the moon that was photographed by the Apollo 20 mission.
The as a consequence of conscious and
unconscious processes blocking of the knowledge of such a humanoid
reality of civilization and evolution, upon the reality of which we
collectively ought to employ scientific reverse engineering and be of disclosure if we with a new
cultural integration want to succeed in thinking along with it, can
also be understood as being the result of a diseased mistrust held
against mankind by a mankind which doesn't keep itself for incapable
but for unworthy and inferior. We already for centuries
have knowledge of UFO's and
have an inferiority complex and a psychology of repression about it
(see also ufoevidence.org and crystallinks). Faced with our shortcomings and inferiority in a certain
area of interest - and why would that be true for spiritual matters by
the way - do we tend to backwardness, false pride and self-destruction.
Especially governments have a hard time psychologically to admit to
anything of succeeding or failing in matters of this concern. With
experts like Stanton T. Friedman (nuclear physicist,see info-page) who regularly testify of the authenticity
of the sightings, is in the documentary of the secrets of the KGB on
these matters the following comment presented by mouth of the russian
ufologist Tiurin Avinsky: 'we are simply not capable to cope with the
knowledge and technology of such a fundamentally different paradigm nor
able to copy any of these designs' (to the right a picture of the disc
that was salvaged by the military in Sverdlovsky). One could just as well show a computer to someone from the
roman empire. The extraterrestrials think in terms of traveling through
dimensions, we in terms of traveling trough a three-dimensionally fixed
reality.  There exists, so it appears from the
disclosures of the Disclosure Group, thus a tension between the
knowledge kept secret and that what we publicly know at the moment. Witnesses testify of
fully operational flying saucers of more than thirty meters wide that
by us were copied. This constitutes a cultural conflict which
cannot be maintained any longer if we want to find closure on the
energy question. The
paradigmatic conflict expresses itself time and again in the form of
disbelief and even in the form of destructive reponses like
declarations of insanity and accusations of fraud. One is referred to
all the reactions of common folk on all the peculiar movies on YouTube.
Many, with among them military people, air traffic controllers, pilots
and normal citizens, lost their jobs because of spilling the beans
about this matter and some even lost their lives with it. One must
consider these victims of the repression to be heroes of our evolution.
In this repression can collectively be recognized a psychiatric pattern
of a schizoid and paranoid bordeline, politicized sociopathic ego; a
conflict of a false, profit-minded control from the side of individual,
fearful civilians and multinational corporations at the other hand who
have themselves represented by governments that, outside of the
democratic control want to pull the strings (in a military/industrial
sense) with security levels ranking even higher than the one of the
american president. The so-called. free energy supression conspiracy theories parallel to this are not
just some unjustified suspicions based on individual failures that are
held against governmental institutions and companies. It is a long
standing festering historical phenomenon in which we at all cost want
to defend and maintain our honor and control. It concerns a struggle in
which mankind gives evidence of symptoms of what factually are
evolutionary pains, growth pains in which not only individuals come to
a fall and have to start all over with a new life, but with which in
the past as known complete cultures fell down and rose again. It can be
compared to an inverted mourning process in which step by step the new reality has to
be accepted and the old way of thinking and repressively acting has to
be given up. UFOs are vehicles originating from spaceborne
civilizations that abandon their planet in a search for new worlds.
There they willing or unwillingly inspire for a continuation of
humanity and the development of a culture and offer they thus a
completly different picture of evolution from the one we have cherished
till now. They constitute a cosmic paradox: man abandons a planet to
promote and sustain the life of man on the planet; and thus it will
also be when we ourselves are etherborne. Their civilization
flourished together with their planet. A flower blooms and whithers
away. Thus it also fares with planets. But itself having sprouted from
seed produces the flower more new seeds. Our human culture and the
biological equilibrium here on earth is a flower and the ethermachine,
the vimana as it in ancient vedic terms is called here on
earth, constitutes, including the winning of energy from the vacuum
belonging to it, the seed which leads to the flower meanwhile
originating from it as well. Some propose that as a theory about our
origins, one may differ in opinion on this, but as an actual practice
of a cultural lead can the phenomenon simply no longer be ignored (see
for instance the video's The Cosmic Plan and the stories of Jim Sparks (en 2 and article), Riley Martin (site) and others like Jaime Moussan who e.g. predict a major turning point around the year
2012).
Many UFO 's above
Nürnberg, Germany 14 april 1561.
Hans Glaser woodcut from 1566, 5 years after it happened.
The
evolution of our science cannot exist apart from the evolution of a
culture belonging to it and that communication process will thus have
to unfold itself. An individual nutcase has a secret science nobody
understands: he doesn't communicate, cannot account for his actions and
submerges with it in a world of schizophrenic delusions of
selfdestruction, of a complete bewilderment in which all sense of
reality is lost. As good as an individual person can fall ill when he
consequently in his evolution is hindered on purpose - but not realy
aware of the dangers - with fabricated and entertained illusions, is it
also possible that a culture runs into a diseased state. Exactly with
keeping the masses ignorant make the masses it for themselves
impossible to defend themselves - or compete with - foreign and also
with alien cultures. That is why we have produced this in writing: that
we may arrive at the understanding that we also must be alowed to
develop a defense, that we may find a way of our own with the free
energy and the anti-gravitation of a better means of transport than the
polluting car (see e.g. the inventors Hutchison and Searl
and a powerpoint presentation
about anti-gravity and the
documentary Who killed the
electric car?). That the
aliens do understand us is proven by a message which was found in a
series of cropcircles near Chilbolton, Engeland that have appeared
since 2000 in consecutive years. After first in 2001 having projected a
human face in a digital
point format was there a
message which constituted an answer to the so-called Arecibo message that we earthlings have sent into space
ourselves in 1974 (see also video). The aliens answered with a similar pattern
and from that pattern followed that they e.g. have a DNA structure
based upon Silicium next to the carbonchemistry of which we are built.
Furthermore indicated they also what their sending and receiving
equipment looked like - see the graphic at the beginning of this page -
and appeared later on in 2002 in Winchester, Hapshire the face of an
alien in the crops that contained a disc with a binary code in ASCII.
The authenticity of the crop pattern seemed to be doubtful according
the researcher Freddy Silva, but the source of the doubt was
partly retracable to Team Satan,
a disinformation-organization of the british secret service MI6, who
possibly are the successors of the infamous Doug and Dave, two elderly
Englismen who stated that they themselves had produced many of the
crop-circles; an untenable claim. Team Satan is commercial, but to
produce as good a pattern as shown here they cannot. The pattern of the
disc was analyzed by the englishman Paul Vigay and was next by
the south-american researcher Jaime Moussan discussed in his lecture. The message would, somewhat enigmatically,
state the following:
"Beware
of the bearers
of false gifts and
the broken promises.
There is much suffering, but still there is time.
Believe that outside there is still the good.
We are against fraud. The conduit closes upon itself."
Differenty understood, that is to say more
focussed on the subject of the paradigmatic conflict and the repression
around the energy question and alien technologies, can this text also
be read as follows:
"Mind those who are making money: their
misrepresentations of reality and their broken promises. One suffers a
lot from this, but it is not a lost cause yet; keep believing that the
good will prevail in the world. We turn away from deceit. The
manipulation will backfire upon itself."
The doubt about the authenticity of this
message is even more opposed by the find of a message delivered earlier
in the summer of 1991 in the form of a peculiar pattern in the crops of
Milk Hill, Engeland. It appeared there as a response to a by tourists
produced crop-circle with the invitation 'talk to us' (see also Colin Andrews in the Google video
Alien Signs). The pattern turned out to be answering to
all the demands that are scientifically formulated for circles to be
counted as an authentic crop pattern: electromagnetic radiation, bent but not
broken stems, etc. It was a
message in strange letters that were analyzed as being ancient Latin
and said: OPPONO ASTOS. Which means: we are against
fraud. Whatever it may be concerning the authentic or inauthentic
of the phenomenon, this is what the circle makers are after: to fight
fraud.
The physicist and philosopher of
science Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) demonstrated that historically one may speak of
a conflict of paradigms the way we know them in a scientific sense from
e.g. of the transition in our world view from the Ptolemeic view (geocentric) to the Copernican perspective (heliocentric). And also may we expect, with
a new galactocentric way of thinking from the perspective of the force field of
the universal ether and the winning of energy belonging to it, a
struggle as a consequence of the natural evolution of our mindfulness.
Such a struggle is necessary for individual persons as well as for
entire cultures in order to adapt ourselves mutually as also adapt
ourselves to nature and the pressure exerted by her evolution. It
concerns a form of growth which is not just taking place in the field
of science, but a growth which also will have its consequences in the
fields of religion, politics and the economy. With that broad spectrum
concept of growth in mind have we now with our story arrived at the
point of the need for us to find out what in our culture can be found
of inventions that were paradigmatically repressed. The labor of the
inventors and their inventions that are partly destroyed and forgotten,
or that are concealed by people with different interests, or else
simply are not noticed, must be uncovered and exposed to proper public
and specialist scrutiny. Many an inventor had to reconstruct his own
work even or had to reconstruct the work of his predecessors that was
destroyed. We have to apply reverse engineering on our own
culture! How was Tesla proceeding and what did Reich exactly do? How
does it all add up theoretically with the effects they all found? Of
what remains after the battles of the paradigmatic struggles we may
guess what in the past all has been discovered by ourselves. Are we
able to recover from the damage we suffered from the scientific
deprivation we ran into? The internet offers us new chances to arrive
at an information-exchange and this pamphlet is so part of that
endeavor. So, what have we found on the internet concerning
developments and reconstructions of forgotten technologies, while the
rest of the media couldn't keep up with it because of the uncertainty
of the novelty and the preliminary nature of early stages?
*1:
Wikipediaabout free
energy suppression: concerns
the conspiracy theory raised by the trauma that one suffered in the
paradigmatic conflict. The refutation of the theory is based upon the
supposedly non-operability of the inventions. But the inventions have
today 2008 for to a certain extend been replicated and already been
patented as well in a number of cases.
-
-
|
