3)
The
paradigmatic conflict
The
paradigmatic conflict between the direct
winning of energy at the one hand and the
existing transformation of raw materials in
association with the secondary sustainable
technologies at the other hand has a
long
history.
The conflict resulted in the destruction and
repression of the work of early pioneers in
this field like Nikola
Tesla
(1846-1943), the inventor of the alternating
current, and Wilhelm
Reich
(1897-1957), who made several discoveries in
this line of research (see also the article
on Einstein,
the ether and
relativism
at this site). After the death of Tesla were
his papers confiscated by the american
government and kept secret because one didn't
want his inventions in
the field of weapons
technology
to end up in the 
wrong
hands. And with that action were also many of
his inventions meant for the civil society
and inventions which could be important for
the development of free energy technology
relegated to the darkness of ignorance.
Already during his lifetime had not only
Tesla great difficulty to keep the status of
and financial support for his work with the
increasing eccentricity of his inventions,
but had also Reich troubles with his
invention of orgone energy - the name he gave
to free energy - about which he had consulted
Einstein. Einstein had rejected him with the
message that there were alternative
explanations to be found, but without him
willing to continue with the investigations.
Nevertheless had Reich irrevocably proven,
against the second law of thermodynamics,
that organic material by nature has a
slightly higher temperature than inorganic
material. With that difference one then had
the proof of his orgone energy. Also people
like Viktor
Schauberger
(see video)
(1885-1958), and John
E.W. Keely
(1827-1898) were not taken seriously because
of their energetic interpretations of the
force of the ether, of which we now
understand that it had to be the dynamical
force of the relative ether the way Einstein
stated it later in his career. Since Einstein
had a shift of paradigm taken place away from
Newton and Maxwell in which scientists could
no longer accept such superseded ideas of the
ether as a uniform substance as being the
correct presentation of the state of affairs
in nature. The concept of ether turned out to
be a bit more complicated thus. The concept
of the ether should not have been abandoned
though but had to be reassessed, and that is
what Einstein finally in 1920 did in public
in a lecture in Leyden, The Netherlands,
where he clearly spoke in defense of a
concept of ether which is based upon the
physical properties that unmistakably are
attached to the reality of space. Matter,
time and space can factually not be
considered as separate things. They define
each other. This change of mind of Einstein
meant an enormous shock for the science of
physics and lead to a great divide among its
members, a divide which the science has never
managed to overcome (see
also Kostro
2000).
Nevertheless is at present of all the
ether
theories
(aether theories) the so-called
Ae-theory
of Einstein
the one most popular among physicists. In
this 
theory
is one since the eighties of the twentieth
century playing with the notion of a
universal concept of time and a fixed frame
of reference in space which is at odds with
the so-called Lorentz
invariance;
it amounts to the fact that one is meddling
with the dogma of the in all directions
invariant speed of light which constitutes
the basis for the theory of relativity.
In
fact converted Einstein with the revision of
his ether notion and turned he back to the
classical theories of the universe that
assign the ether an all-important place in
creation, be it that he now considered also
the ether as relative, as a form of space
depending upon material characteristics.
Of
course can only be spoken of progress when
the new way of thinking of modern physics
encompasses the old way, and not so much when
one tries to reinvent the wheel of the
classics with a lot of ego. A 'theory of
everything' contains of course also the truth
of the past. Nikola Tesla in the New York
Times of 11 July 1935 said about Einstein's
descriptions: "magnificent mathematical
garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes
people blind to the underlying errors. The
theory is like a beggar clothed in purple
whom ignorant people take for a king..., its
exponents are brilliant men but they are
metaphysicists rather than scientists.."
(see wikipedia
article).
Einstein is not as concrete and clear as an
ingenious and original inventor and engineer
specialized in practicable thinking als Tesla
would like. One doesn't all of a sudden have
a 'new theory of everything', an integer
paradigm. And Einstein's notion of a relative
ether was also not something new either. His
'new ether' can be retraced to the vedic
culture of India which we, especially from
the Hare Krishna's, learned to know since the
sixties of the twentieth century. Therein is
the ether divided in three, in other words:
considered relative. Vedically one speaks
of
three Vishnus who each represent another part
of the ether
(cosmic,
universal en local). Also 
the
esoteric philosopher Rudolf Steiner
(1861-1925), a contemporary of Einstein,
spoke of a relative ether: the expanding
warmth ether and the light ether as opposed
to the contracting chemical or sound ether
and the life ether (with to the left pictured
the respective symbols).
History teaches us that
repressive progress, progress in which
previous developments are entirely denied,
repressed and forgotten, leads to a serious
obstruction or else collapse of the
civilization in question. The roman empire
e.g. has, as a culture, as a time system
directed to the order of the moon, in about
two steps abolished itself: first was by
Julius Caesar 45 B.C. the lunar calendar
abolished and replaced by a solar calendar,
and next was the order of the week that was
projected upon the solar calendar, but still
knew its traditional lunar division, for
practical reasons (the market) for the civil
population abolished by Constantine the Great
in 321 A.D. The correspondence with the moon
(in so-called Ides, Nones and Kalends) was at
the time definitely replaced by the linear,
not leaped order of the week that was
introduced by him (for the monasterial rule
was it by the Christians maintained till the
end of the Middle Ages). Little more than a
hundred years after Constantine introduced
the linear week, stormed the barbarians the
administratively and culturally completely
eroded city of Rome to be plundered by a
so-called 'primitive' barbarian culture
directed to... indeed the lunar calendar!
Also Islam managed in the seventh century
A.D. with its prayer times to the sun to put
a foot in the european cultural doorway of
linear weeks and is up to the present day in
conflict with it (as well with itself as with
the West). Repressive progress at the cost of
that what historically preceded is thus no
real progress at all but a compensatory
phenomenon. There is renewal, but the synergy
does not improve: it crumbles only further
away. With the ego of the renewal is easily
the continuity with the past broken, with the
old regime, and thus is one losing one's
integration and falls the culture down. A
common culture (or order of time) can
factually, if one wishes to keep it in a
working order, only be expanded upon, one
e.g. adds such a complication as a solar
calendar or linear week to it, but the
inheritance of the thereto belonging culture
of the lunar calendar preceding can't just
like that be erased from the collective
memory or the (genetically programmed)
consciousness of the natural reality. If one
nevertheless tries to do that, is one in that
case grossly underestimating the power of
time conditionings. Within a culture is a
certain continuity needed when one doesn't
want to speak of a fall down of that culture.
Old mistakes and imperfections must thus be
understood and remembered the way one also
commemorates wars, and cannot be repressed
just like that just to get rid of the old
misery. The free energy researcher
Peter
Lindeman states relating to
this:
"In this society, theoretical science has
been elevated to a very high level of
prestige. Under this system of belief, the
real needs of humanity have not been well
served. It is time that these incorrect
theories be carefully examined and discarded,
so that experimental science can once again
take the leading role in defining the nature
of physical reality. Only then will Etheric
Science be free to offer its bounty of
solutions to a desperate and waiting
world." History will repeat itself if we
haven't learned from it, if we don't remember
what went wrong. The later Julian calendar
e.g. needed a correction in the method of
leaping in order to accord with the classical
play of forces of the ether, but the calendar
shouldn't in its entirety have been
abolished, the way the pope it at the end of
the Middle Ages did for the monasteries. To
be aware of repression is something we
learned later on from the behavioral science,
or art, of psychoanalysis. The unconscious is
an enemy facilitating a sudden change of
culture or a break of paradigm, a change
which because of that same enemy of not being
conscious is also dangerous: on the personal
level we e.g. may remember it from the
popular song with the text 'suddenly he
was not the man he used to be' the way
the Beatles sang it in 'Yesterday'. Just as a
breakdown can change an individual human
being completely overnight, is also a war on
a collective scale capable of changing people
no-time into zombies who no longer understand
matters, who are out of touch with their past
and change into animals. The psychiatrist
calls it decompensation of the ego: the
performance of control can no longer be kept
up.
The
present established, 'classical', indirect
method of winning energy based on coal, oil
and gas, which felt threatened by the energy
innovators and inventors, has till the end of
the twentieth century, till very recently
thus, been very repressive and destructive.
That has not only resulted in many a personal
and scientific drama, but has also
contributed to an obstruction of the progress
that mankind needs in order to survive on
this planet, we now begin to realize. On e.g.
the webpage PESwiki-suppression
and in the Lightworks documentary
Tesla
and the race to Zero point
energy
are many cases discussed. One of the best
known is the suppression of Tesla by his
financier J.P. Morgan who cancelled e.g. his
entire Wardenclyffe
project
of free energy for the entire planet because
it couldn't generate any income. The
repression of this kind of inventions as well
as the traumatized paranoia about the
free
energy suppression1
associated with it, can no longer be
maintained, even though the danger of some
inventions indeed mustn't be underestimated
and may justify a certain secrecy. For this
kind of secrecy developed Tesla himself e.g.
a complex procedure about the proliferation
of a weapons system of his in which he
diminished the risk of possible abuse as much
as he could by dividing the knowledge in
question over several governments of the
countries in the world: it would only work if
they would cooperate. The threat of a total
collapse of the culture and the thereto
belonging world peace, the danger of
decompensation as the psychiatrist calls it,
with the repression of the inventions in the
field of the direct winning of energy, is
just as well a clear and present danger. A
stressed culture may give an odd response.
For a long time one may compensate for a lack
of knowledge and skills, with nice movies on
television e.g., but these compensations are
but a surrogate of course, in the end there
is only the possibility of a new culture when
the essential knowledge thereof is shared and
handed down in the educational system.
Keeping people ignorant one creates a
sub-class with the size of the base of a
pyramid relating to the top, and thus having
created has one that way arrived at an
inequality of citizens which sooner or later,
violent or not, will result in a reaction
like it concerned something determined by a
law of nature. The way gaseous molecules mix
into a homogenous mass, can also the equality
among people in the field of knowledge not be
stopped. Thus must we take care not to throw
away the child of the continuity, the soul of
the culture, away with the bathing water of
renewal and innovation. And it indeed seems
to be so that we collectively will have to
change our energy policy, whether we like it
or not. For the resources used in
non-sustainable energy are getting depleted
and the limits of what our environment can
bear are reached. The indirect, renewable
form of winning energy keeps demanding for a
greater efficiency, which refers to a more
direct method of winning sustainable energy.
We simply have to thus, however attached we
are to the old order of the secondary policy
of winning energy. For the same reason of in
the future having to be vegetarians because
the production of meat is simply a very
inefficient way of producing proteins which
cannot be maintained with increasing numbers
of people on the planet, must we also let go
of the old policy of winning energy and the
thereto belonging economical and geopolitical
strategies. We therefore have to expand our
view with the extra concept of a primary way
of winning energy and thus correct our
relativistic paradigm with the 'absolute
relativity' of the order of the primary
energy in the universe. The repression may
not become a decompensation but must,
politically correct, more or less
therapeutically, in a psychologically
responsible manner be guided towards a
revaluation of the by many a 'modern'
scientist so very much despised concept of
ether. And in that case play as well the new
inventions a part as the notion of a second
'converted' Einstein who later on in 1920
said that he had been too 'radical' in his
rejection of the ether as being a superfluous
and out-dated concept1.
We
are simply driven by the force of evolution
to which we all, as energetic, ethereal,
living beings are subjected. We are dealing
with a compelling force of nature that is
mightier than the individual decision of
single persons, national governments or
supranational, financial interest groups. And
that evolution followed probably quite a
different course from what we always have
thought it would have with Charles Darwin.
Modern skulls have been found in layers of
petrified sediment of millions years old and
next to traces of dinosaurs have been found
just as old fossilized foot prints of modern
man2.
The ruling paradigm always represses the
anomaly - or the invention of an alternative
technology of winning energy in our case -
and the new paradigm will have to integrate
that knowledge. The new energy suppression is
thus not so much a matter of evil minded
persons, institutions or administrations, but
is more an intellectual problem of a
paradigmatic revolution. One has to grasp it,
drop out and then switch over to it. Only if
a majority does this has the new paradigm
arrived. Till that time is everything of it
joyously ridiculed. It is the way the
philosopher Schopenhauer
(1788-1860)
said it and after him also the psychoanalyst
S. freud and the SF-author Arthur C. Clarke:
firstly one is ridiculed, then one is opposed
and next is one accepted as if it concerned
the most common thing in the world (see the
quotation at the beginning). It is a known
mechanism of which many writers and artists
can testify. To be acknowledged, takes some
time, and that is thus also true for a new
technology. Nature commands us how to behave,
viz. to be adapted to time and circumstance,
and the same way command our genes us as well
as the culture does we have developed with
it. To evolve, also culturally thus, is more
an established fact, a cosmic necessity, a
need which in all her effects of refinement
and improvement of adaptations must be
retracable in all the worlds of living, and
thus also on other planets if we could visit
them. The often from the side of the
government classified investigations about
UFO's, extraterrestrial life, that is to say
extraterrestrial human, humanoid life and
human civilizations, point always in that
direction. Among scientists there is no doubt
that extraterrestrial life with a high degree
of civilization exists (see e.g. the
Drake-equation).
The problem is more in delivering the proof,
or better stated, in the repression of the
proof we have. More and more is there in the
past couple of years (2005-2007) from the
side of the (american) government, from
military organizations and the scientific
community an increasing openness. The proof
that such an intelligent, highly evolved
culture is observing us, was in the past kept
away from the public, if necessary with
disinformation, intimidation or worse
measures, in order not to disturb the common
man and to prevent that one as a government
would be faced with
unwanted civil
initiatives
and collective psychological problems. One
doesn't want to be embarrassed with the then
inevitably rising demands for control and
action one administratively and
scientifically cannot immediately answer to.
It is for everyone an uncharted territory.
But it is also true that we in the context of
our subject mustn't just look away from
extraterrestrial phenomena. In that context
are we namely faced with an alternative and
undoubtedly much more civilized, energy
policy and a better form of self control of
not just the individual, but also of a better
science and culture of living together in
relation to gravity and moving through time
and space. In that sense can the energy
question not be regarded separately from our
concepts of space, the order of time, the
forces of nature, elementary particles and
the existence of more dimensions than the
three or four we acknowledge at the moment.
Let us therefore first delve deeper into that
what we have witnessed to be true for our
extraterrestrial visitors, for we are more
conscious then of where we are standing
ourselves and what remains to be done by us.
We
learn through observation, after first, very
socratically, having accepted our ignorance,
and mustn't assume that we will learn
anything if we turn away from matters like
these. It takes courage, but it is also very
scientific, not to jump to conclusions
immediately but simply admit that there might
be something we do not know. How else may one
discover anything? About extraterrestrials
and the energy politics associated with them
has been produced a fine documentary called:
UFO:
The Greatest Story Ever
Denied
by Joe Escamilla. Therein he answers the
question how and why the american government,
or in fact a shadow government of national
and international institutes, have kept UFO's
and their free energy technology a secret for
the wider public. There is mention of a group
of people, of whistle-blowers from within the
governmental institutions in America, who
stepped up to act against the secrecy: the
UFO
Disclosure
Group
(zee also disclosure.net
and some
dutch pages).
In May 2001 they gave a press
conference
and posted they on Google video's with
testimonial accounts (zie Video's
1
&2).
The present chairman is named
dr.
Steven Greer.
He has a site named AERO.
Another well-known protagonist is
Stephen
Basset of
the exopolitics Paradigm
Research
Group.
These people state that humanity is suffering
too much damage from the for political and
economical reasons, in combination with
billions of dollars consuming so-called
z.g. black projects (see the video
Billion
Dollar
Secret),
keeping secret among other things the
knowledge already available of energy systems
of an alien origin. With this knowledge are
there, based on reverse engineering of
crashed UFO's and contacts with aliens
themselves, already by human beings
manufactured ETV's, or extraterrestrial
vehicles, like the TR-3B secret USAF
craft. Also have free energy technologies
been classified. One may be referred to the
words of the hacker
Gary
Mackinnon
(site,
wiki,
pagina,
blog,
interview),
the Google video presentation:
The
Case for
Antigravity,
an interview with the Area
51 specialist Edgar
Fouché,
the testimonies of physicist
Bob Lazar
(video
1&2),
the ex-Majestic
12
collaborator the microbiologist Dan Burisch
(video,
interviews;
page's,
site,
info)
and a lecture of Stan
Deyo
(site,
book).
But the truth can despite of all the secrecy
not be stopped in this inevitable cultural
evolution towards a greater planetary,
humanoid awareness. Countless patens have
been awarded the last hundred years
concerning UFO-technological inventions. The
researcher Luke
Fortune
bundled since 1997 in five thick volumes 3200
pages of descriptions of 260 patents of
replicable 
designs
(see e.g. the U.S. patents 3774865
en 10074934).
There are also designs from the Nazi-germany
era in which one tried to use this technology
to obtain military superiority. The Germans,
who forced free energy inventors like
Victor
Schauberger
to work for them, called their prototypes
'rundflugzeuge', or 'roundcrafts'.
Their term for space energy was
'vril-energie' and they called their
prototypes Vrils (ranking up to number 8 see
right picture) and Haunebu's (up to type
III). Vril was a term in 1870 coined by
Sir
Edward
Bulwer-Lytton
in a book called Vril,
The Power of the Coming
race,
an early science-fiction book of the
victorian writer who also wrote
The
last Days of
Pompei.
The roundcrafts were pretty crude iron discs
with a dome with windows, and the prototypes
actually worked! (German
site,
pictures).
In the next chapter we will see how the
Nazi's who resented the 'american-jewish'
science came up with a free energy device as
well. Fortune states that the absence of
applications of these inventions is mainly
caused by the fact that the usual means of
propulsion and the thereto belonging
conventional ways of winning energy are more
profitable. The initial impetus for the new
paradigm is undoubtedly present in countless
practically applicable forms, but the culture
for it is simply not achieved yet. The
internet is part of this paradigmatic
development and runs in many respects far
ahead of the other media, mainly because
everyone may contribute, whether serious or
not, and because of the fact that a
documentary on the internet sinks in properly
while on TV it by accident has to be recorded
to serve as study material. More and more
networks post their essential materials on
the internet as we can see e.g. on
their
sites.
On Google and on YouTube one can study
countless professional and amateur movies of
often vague, but sometimes also very
convincing proofs of the UFO-presence and the
matter of free energy. To begin with we would
like to refer to four sensational YouTube
movies from the UFO realm that raise doubts
by many because they appear so real. In the
next section will we further expound on the
energy question. Of the following evidence
has not been proven that is was faked.
1)
A UFO seen very nearby during a coverage of
presumably the italian
tv.
Behind the journalist giving his report
suddenly people look up to see there together
with him a UFO of a couple of meters wide, as
it slowly glides away behind a building.
2)
A UFO very ceary visible with navigation
controls above a small river in
italy.
A clearly visible disc of three to four
meters floats above a small river showing
some technology of moving parts, after which
it suddenly flashes away as fast as a
bullit.
3)
A challenging UFO viewed from a helicopter
close to the former
WTC-buidings
- see also version2.
A UFO of again a couple of meters wide shoots
away from behind a WTC building and leaves
behind, something which is very uncommon, a
condensation trail. About a kilometer away it
stops mid-air and then races for the
helicopter from which everything is recorded.
Just before it would hit the chopper the
craft makes a sharp turn right in front of it
to race away with lightning speed.
4)
A
UFO-wreck thousands of years old found on the
moon during the Apollo 20
mission
(video
2 -
see also another
discussion of other UFOs seen by
NASA).
Slowly with a scan of the lunar surface
appears a peculiar vehicle in sight of the
camera with a technical protusion like a
cockpit on top and alien signs on the hull,
as also meteor impacts on top of it.
Comments: 'this vehice is in a bad condition,
it must be here for billions of years.
Concerning the direct
encounters with these extraterrestrial
civiliations is there of the investgating
journalist, the renown UFO-expert
Jaime
Moussan,
a good
video of a conference in Mexico to the
occasion of incidents
there,
in which photographic materials of aliens,
together with their messages in the form of
the well known patterns in the fields or the
so-called crop circles was discussed (see
also our other article
about this).
Sgt. Clifford Stone (US Army) of the UFO
Disclosure Group mentions 57
different species
of
aliens, of which some
can be found
onYouTube
with photographs that escaped the control of
governmental agencies (see also
alienvideo.net).
Next to that is there a documentary about
UFOs in Russia called UFO
KGB Secrets, presented by Roger
Moore,
which delivers very convincing proofs of the
existence of UFO's and the secrecy by the
russian government of (sometimes violent)
confrontations with the interplanetary
visitors, including an autopsy on alien
bodily remains and photo materials
of
an in the region of Sverdlovsky in 1968
crashed UFO
(thus independent of the Roswell-crash4).
Also was there, believe it or not, beginning
of 2007 a
report of an intervieuw with an alien
3
to be seen on Youtube which, as a
top-secret of the the government,
because the copyrights would have been
violated, was removed from the internet.
Later on was it posted again though. The
picture at the left is from that intervieuw.
The existence of the being named J-rod
(EBE-2) is confirmed by Dan Burisch, who did
extensive biochemical research on it
(see
his
declarations).
There is thus no lack of evidence from even
the most reliable sources. Within the UFO
Disclosure Group there are witnesses from the
NSA, FBI, CIA and all departments of the
armed forces of America, who are often of the
highest security levels within these world's
most powerful and mighty societal
institutions. One of the arguments they put
forward is: ' absense of evidence is no
evidence of absense', we musn't think
that these phenomena are fabrications of
hysterical people when secret services are
keeping matters like these confidential.
These people are willing to testify even
under oath before congress of the
irrefutable reality of this for mankind such
an all-imporrant matter reaching far beyond
what the public as yet has been allowed to
have knowledge of.
The
spaceship on the moon that was photographed
by the Apollo 20 mission.
The
as a consequence of conscious and unconscious
processes blocking of the knowledge of such a
humanoid reality of civilization and
evolution, upon the reality of which we
collectively ought to employ scientific
reverse
engineering
and be of disclosure if we with a new
cultural integration want to succeed in
thinking along with it, can also be
understood as being the result of a diseased
mistrust held against mankind by a mankind
which doesn't keep itself for incapable but
for unworthy and inferior. We
already
for centuries have knowledge of UFO's
and
have an inferiority complex and a psychology
of repression about it (see also
ufoevidence.org
and crystallinks).
Faced with our shortcomings and inferiority
in a certain area of interest - and why would
that be true for spiritual matters by the way
- do we tend to backwardness, false pride and
self-destruction. Especially governments have
a hard time psychologically to admit to
anything of succeeding or failing in matters
of this concern. With experts like
Stanton
T. Friedman
(nuclear physicist,see
info-page)
who regularly testify of the authenticity of
the sightings, is in the documentary of the
secrets of the KGB on these matters the
following comment presented by mouth of the
russian ufologist Tiurin Avinsky: 'we are
simply not capable to cope with the knowledge
and technology of such a fundamentally
different paradigm or able to copy any of
these designs' (to the right a picture of the
disc that was salvaged by the military in
Sverdlovsky).
One
could just as well show a computer to someone
from the roman empire. The extraterrestrials
think in terms of traveling through
dimensions, we in terms of traveling trough a
three-dimensionally fixed reality.
There
exists, so is it appears from the disclosures
of the Disclosure Group, thus a tension
between the knowledge kept secret and that
what we publicly know at the moment.
Witnesses
testify of fully operational flying saucers
of more than thirty meters wide that by us
were copied.
This constitutes a cultural conflict which
cannot be entertained any longer if we want
to find closure on the energy
question. The
paradigmatic conflict expresses itself time
and again in the form of disbelief and even
in the form of destructive reponses like
declarations of mental insanity and
accusations of fraud. One is referred to all
the reactions of common folk on all the
peculiar movies on YouTube. Many, with among
them military people, air traffic
controllers, pilots and normal citizens, lost
their jobs because of spilling the beans
about this matter and some even lost their
loves with it. One must consider these
victims of the repression to be heroes of our
evolution. In this repression can
collectively be recognized a psychiaytric
pattern of a schizoid and paranoid bordeline,
politicized sociopathic ego; a conflict of a
false, profit-minded control from the side of
individual, fearful civilians and
multinational corporations at the other hand
who have themselves represented by
governments that, outside of the democratic
control want to pull the strings (in a
military/industrial sense) with security
levels ranking even higher than the one of
the american president. The
so-called.
free energy
supression
conspiracy theories parallel to this are not
just some unjustified suspicions based on
individual failures that are held against
governmental institutions and companies. Is
is a long standing festering historical
phenomenon in which we at all cost want to
defend and maintain our honor and control. It
concerns a struggle in which mankind gives
evidence of symptoms of what factually are
evolutionary pains, growth pains in which not
only individuals come to a fall and have to
start all over with a new life, but with
which in the past as known complete cultures
fell down and rose again. It can be compared
to an inverted mourning
process
in which step by step the new reality has to
be accepted and the old way of thinking and
repressively acting has to be given up. UFOs
are vehicles originating from
spaceborne civilizations that abandon
their planet in a search for new worlds.
There they willing or unwillingly inspire for
a continuation of humanity and the
development of a culture and offer they thus
a completly different picture of evolution
from the one we have cherished till now. They
constitute a cosmic paradox: man abandons a
planet to promote and sustain the life of man
on the planet; and thus it will also be when
we ourselves are etherborne. Their
civilization flourished together with their
planet. A flower blooms and whithers away.
Thus it also fares with planets. But itself
having sprouted from seed produces the flower
more new seeds. Our human culture and the
biological equilibrium here on earth is a
flower and the ethermachine, the vimana
as it in ancient vedic terms is called
here on earth, constitutes, including the
winning of energy from the vacuum belonging
to it, the seed which leads to the flower
meanwhile originating from it as well. Some
propose that as a theory about our origins,
one may differ in opinion on this, but as an
actual practice of a cultural lead can the
phenomenon simply no longer be ignored (see
for instance the video's The
Cosmic
Plan
and the stories of
Jim Sparks
(en
2),
Riley
Martin
(site)
and others like Jaime
Moussan
who e.g. predict a major turning point around
the year 2012).
Many
UFO 's above Nürnberg, Germany 14 april
1561.
Hans Glaser woodcut from 1566, 5 years after
it happened.
The
evolution of our science cannot exist apart
from the evolution of a culture belonging to
it and that communication process will thus
have to unfold itself. An individual nutcase
has a secret science nobody understands: he
doesn't communicate, cannot account for his
actions and submerges with it in a world of
schizophrenic delusions of selfdestruction,
of a complete bewilderment in which all sense
of reality is lost. As good as an individual
person can fall ill when he consequently in
his evolution is hindered on purpose - but
not realy aware of the dangers - with
fabricated and entertained illusions, is it
also possible that a culture runs into a
diseased state. Exactly with keeping the
masses ignorant make the masses it for
themselves impossible to defend themselves -
or compete with - foreign and also with alien
cultures. That is why we have produced this
in writing: that we may arrive at the
understanding that we also must be alowed to
develop a defense, that we may find a way of
our own with the free energy and the
anti-gravitation of a better means of
transport than the polluting car (see e.g.
the inventors Hutchison
and Searl
and a powerpoint
presentation about
anti-gravity
and the documentary Who
killed the electric
car?).
That the aliens do understand us is proven by
a message which was found in a series of
cropcircles near Chilbolton, Engeland that
have appeared since 2000 in consecutive
years. After first in 2001 having projected a
human
face in a digital point
format
was there a message which constituted an
answer to the so-called Arecibo
message
that we earthlings have sent into space
ourselves in 1974 (see
also video).
The aliens answered with a likewise pattern
and from that pattern followed that they e.g.
have a DNA structure based upon Silicium next
to the carbonchemistry of which we are built.
Furthermore indicated they also what their
sending and receiver equipment looked like -
see the graphic at the beginning of this page
- and appered later on in 2002 in Winchester,
Hapshire the face of an alien in the crops
that contained a disc with a binary code in
ASCII. The authenticity of the crop pattern
seemed to be doubtful according the
researcher Freddy
Silva,
but the source
of the doubt was partly retracable to Team
Satan,
a disinformation-organization of the british
secret service MI6, who possibly are the
successors of the infamous Doug and Dave, two
elderly Englismen who stated that they
themselves had produced many of the
crop-circles; an untenable claim. Team Satan
is commercial, but to produce as good a
pattern as shown here they cannot. The
pattern of the disc was
analyzed
by the englishman Paul Vigay and was next by
the south-american researcher
Jaime
Moussan
discussed
in his
lecture.
The message would, somewhat enigmatically,
state the following:
"Beware
of the bearers
of false gifts and
the broken promises.
There is much suffering, but still there
is time.
Believe that outside there is still the
good.
We are against fraud. The conduit closes
upon itself."
Differenty
understood, that is to say more focussed on
the subject of the paradigmatic conflict and
the repression around the energy question and
alien technologies, can this text also be
read as follows:
"Mind
those who are making money: their
misrepresentations of reality and their
broken promises. One suffers a lot from
this, but it is not a lost cause yet; keep
believing that the good will prevail in
the world. We turn away from deceit. The
manipulation will backfire upon itself."
The
doubt about the authenticity of this message
is even more opposed by the find of a message
delivered earlier in the summer of 1991 in
the form of a peculiar pattern in the crops
of Milk Hill, Engeland. It appeared there as
a response to a by tourists produced
crop-circle with the invitation
'talk
to us'
(see also Colin Andrews in the Google video
Alien
Signs).
The pattern turned out to be answering to all
the demands that are scientifically
formulated for circles to be counted as an
authentic crop pattern: electromagnetic
radiation, bent but not broken stems,
etc.
It was a message in strange letters that were
analyzed as being ancient Latin and said:
OPPONO ASTOS. Which means:
we are against fraud. Whatever it may
be concerning the authentic or inauthentic of
the phenomenon, this is what the circle
makers are after: to fight fraud.
The
physicist and philosopher of science
Thomas
Kuhn
(1922-1996) demonstrated that historically
one may speak of a conflict of paradigms the
way we know them in a scientific sense from
e.g. of the transition in our world view from
the Ptolemeic
view
(geocentric) to the Copernican
perspective
(heliocentric). And also may we expect, with
a new galactocentric
way of
thinking
from the perspective of the force field of
the universal ether and the winning of energy
belonging to it, a struggle as a consequence
of the natural evolution of our mindfulness.
Such a struggle is necessary for individual
persons as well as for entire cultures in
order to adapt ourselves mutually as also
adapt ourselves to nature and the pressure
exerted by her evolution. It concerns a form
of growth which is not just taking place in
the field of science, but a growth which also
will have its consequences in the fields of
religion, politics and the economy. With that
broad spectrum concept of growth in mind have
we now with our story arrived at the point of
the need for us to find out what in our
culture can be found of inventions that were
paradigmatically repressed. The labor of the
inventors and their inventions that are
partly destroyed and forgotten, or that are
concealed by people with different interests,
or else simply are not noticed, must be
uncovered and exposed to proper public and
specialist scrutiny. Many a inventor had to
reconstruct his own work even or had to
reconstruct the work of his predecessors that
was destroyed. We have to apply reverse
engineering on our own culture! How was
Tesla proceeding and what did Reich exactly
do? How does it all add up theoretically with
the effects they all found? Of what remains
after the battles of the paradigmatic
struggles we may guess what in the past all
has been discovered by ourselves. Are we able
to recover from the damage we suffered from
the scientific deprivation we ran into? The
internet offers us new chances to arrive at
an information-exchange and this pamphlet is
so part of that endeavor. So, what have we
found on the internet concerning developments
and reconstructions of forgotten
technologies, while the rest of the media
couldn't keep up with it because of the
uncertainty of the novelty and the
preliminary nature of early
stages?
*1:
Wikipediaabout
free energy
suppression:
concerns the conspiracy theory raised by the
trauma that one suffered in the paradigmatic
conflict. The refutation of the theory is
based upon the supposedly non-operability of
the inventions. But the inventions have today
2008 for to a certain extend been replicated
and already been patented as well in a number
of cases.
